patrick.net

This is for all the women of the earth I guess. Get that out of the way first. I think the Carter scam years are upon us now. You know when they suddenly found out that oil is not generated out of lava which continually makes pools of oil. Of course it's not we are running out of oil. Yea yea running out of oil. Thats the ticket. It started with a cartel of course. Ole Jimmy is faster than you knew. See if you come up with a good scam. You could even become President. Ever since then day in and day out this oil game has been run into war and everything else till we are sick of it. Now with the tax base eroded. I guess they will be skimming for oil. Yea thats the ticket skimming for oil. Profits skiming oil profits. I'll make out good there so will all concerned. Whoops a little to much off the top there.

Bill Clintons Mortgage Backed Security scam. Which was backed by nothing. Does not seem to be working out anymore. Time to order some take out. See you later

DaveM_Renter says

@Mark - you rock, if I were buying I’d hire you I do agree with almost everything you said, except that I do believe that South Pasadena will fall. Simply because the “good school premium” is starting to reach the point where it’s getting cheaper to opt for private schools.

I'm certainly hoping that's the case that prices will fall in South Pasadena, but will buy even if they stay flat for 18 months straight. That's why I'm sitting pretty and waiting for 18 months straight of RE prices staying flat or going up before I purchase.

As has been stated, the "good public school premium" is just a pass-through cost. The $300k extra that I pay compared to LAUSD territory as an example, I will get back when I sell 15+ years later to another family with school age kids that values good public schools.

It costs $500k-$800k (accounting for future inflation) to send 2 kids to a good K-12 private school. Most good private schools are in the $20k/year range....you do the math. You will never get those $500k-$800k back like you will with the good public school housing premium.

Mr.Fantastic says

Ronnie Honduras says

Woah… I screwed up the html in that last post. I meant to comment on Mr. Fantastic’s comment / quote his. Instead I managed to attribute my own comment to someone else by mistake.

These are my words in reply to Mr. F.:

DING! DING! DING! When will some people learn that much of government is nothing but organized crime with a flag on the wall?

Exactly. Appraisers are just people. You push $15,000 towards them with a wink, and they know what to do. Corruption is inherent in the housing market.

Agree. Housing sector is the most corrupt and lying/fraud/predatory stuff etc. are hardly prosecuted.

Mr.Fantastic says

run-down $1.5 million fixers because people simply don’t have the cash to fix them on $80,412 a year.

Oh no! We must be fueling another bubble since households that make $80k/year can get loans for $1.5 million fixers + $300k HELOCs to restore the grand old dames--according to you.

Mr.Fantastic says

The Irvine economy, along with being centrally located to all of OC, and LA/SD is one of the biggest perks of living here.

Haha....it's a 2 hour drive from Irvine to downtown L.A. or downtown San Diego during rush hour...definitely not centrally located by any means....and that's reflected in the low average $/sq ft. Land isn't scarce in Irvine, and won't be for many decades. As long as there's more supply than demand, the average $/sq. ft will remain low.

Stockton is centrally located to SF and Sacramento by your standards.

ArtimusMaxtor says

Bill Clintons Mortgage Backed Security scam. Which was backed by nothing. Does not seem to be working out anymore. Time to order some take out. See you later

Artimus what in the world are you talking about? Some of the stuff you post seems incredibly random.

Sorry I don't mean to bore the incredibly intelligent Knew. Your my fav too Mr. Fantastic. How could you be second to none. HaHa.

In rural areas they grow their own pot. Their own wine. Mostly don't wear clothes around the place. Party like you've never partied before. Sleep like a baby. With no traffic. That may be a bit to hedonistic for many of you. So be careful when and if you buy there. You may run into some counter culture people.

@Mark_M -
Mark_LA says

As has been stated, the “good public school premium” is just a pass-through cost. The $300k extra that I pay compared to LAUSD territory as an example, I will get back when I sell 15+ years later to another family with school age kids that values good public schools.
It costs $500k-$800k (accounting for future inflation) to send 2 kids to a good K-12 private school. Most good private schools are in the $20k/year range….you do the math. You will never get those $500k-$800k back like you will with the good public school housing premium.

About that math - you're comparing that $300k upfront to $40k/year over 12 years, they're awefully close, in fact you end up paying close to $600k if you pay your loan over 30 years. And if the school happens to go downhill (not all good schools remain good forever) then you're locked in and your "pass though premium" also is at risk.

But the point I was making is that if house prices drop in the surrounding areas then either your $300k premium turns into a $400k or $500k premium - or Pasadena prices will have to fall too. It's as simple as that.

See everyones screwed that goes into those newer building type rentals. The older buildings for the most part ok. Because they price fix. They fix them near mortgage payment levels. They may be even higher than that now. Where you make out is you keep your down payment. The first 10 years on any loan. Is nothing but interest payments. To go and refinance your house. Just isn't all that swift. Hardly nothing goes to principle.

What needs to happen is people only rent from those that own older buildings. However even in those sometimes the lenders call the shots or the landlords are too greedy to make their prices at the proper level. So you rent a house or you go into and rent something else. I wouldn't give someone that gouged me a dime.

A liter of coke costs 1.59 by coincidence so does a liter of pepsi. Ok so is there price fixing. Of course there is. Look at the price of cars. All prices are fixed for the most part. You can't negotiate the price of a coke. By way of that a liter of coke costs 1c to make including the bottle. THATS ALMOST A 1500% MARKUP. See if you want to eat your going to have to accept price fixing with ridiculously high mark ups. The one place I found I can get away with negotiations. Is as an investor. I take a big chunk out of them there. For every time they've screwed me with their price fixing. A VW used to cost 3k most cars were around 4k now they are almost uniformly 13 to 20k. The productions lines have gotten better and automated. Yet they cost more.

A whole lot of people try to discover what it costs to make that car. I can tell you not that much. You have on an average of a 700 to 10,000 percent markup on anything you buy. I try to get them back for screwing me. I'm not working for these gougers. I used to I was very unhappy. They get you trapped living in their dwellings. Working for them. Buying their greedy marked up goods.

MMM. Nice shot Dave. You mean pretenders. That owe more than they look it?

FalconMaster says

Take your liberal, socialist-loving ideals elsewhere.

That's a technique called "Label the message, shoot the messenger." It's very common on AM radio as a way to avoid actually discussing any ideas that might result in fair taxes on the ultra-rich.

Discussing ideas is hard and dangerous, because you might have to admit the other side has some merit.

Simply labelling and dismissing the individual is easy and safe, because then you never have to consider the possibility of mistakes in your own position.

I learned this from a book called "Answering Back" by David Coates. Chapter 2 is brilliant.

Pardon me if this is redundant. I didn't read all the previous comments. I have to agree with Patrick on his assessment of the pricing on this property. I live in LA and know this area well. One important factor to consider is the income to price ratio in the area. According to Wikipedia, South Pas has a median household income of around $80,000 as of 2009. The median selling price in the area should hover around three times that. So the median home price in South Pas should be around $240,000. According to Redfin the median house value in the city is currently over $800,000! The actual median selling price in Nov 2010 was $590,000, which includes condos as well as houses. The lower figure is most likely due to the fact that most sales activity is happening at the low end - even in supposedly wealthy areas. Some desirable areas will run a little higher, but even if we allow for prices to run five times the median household income (which is way outside of the formula for sound affordability) we are looking at a projected median of $400,000 for the city, max. Homes are still hugely overpriced in South Pasadena. We should see a fall of at least thirty or even fifty percent in that area before we hit sustainable fundamentals.

Mr.Fantastic says

ArtimusMaxtor says

MMM. Nice shot Dave. You mean pretenders. That owe more than they look it?

Pretty much. The current pricing in South Pasadena isn’t sustainable (at least not until 2035). You think these pretenders are going to hold on that long bleeding money?

It will probably come down in the next 5 to 10 years. It will be a slow fall due to government slowing it down, but it's still a gradual going down. Free market won't let it stay there, people don't have the income for that.

Mr.Fantastic says

Of course, I’m sure there will be plenty of suckers willing to drop 600 large on a 100 year old house with 1 bathroom.

Yep, one sucker will hand it over to next sucker and so on, all the way to the bottom!

HaHa bubble sitter hahahaha thats a neat nick