patrick.net

Headset, go rent "Tropic Thunder" and laugh for a couple of hours. Here's a good article on seller psychology (or should we just call it price stickiness?)
Dan Ariely, a behavioral economics professor at Duke University's Fuqua School of Business and author of "Predictably Irrational," said the "better-than-average" effect is at play. And knowing your next-door neighbors sold their house for $500,000 makes it even more imperative for a homeowner to top that price.
"We feel that we're better than other people. We're unique. We're special," he said. "It stands to reason that our houses are also special."
The attachment to a house only intensifies the more a homeowner personalizes it, creating an extension of themselves.
"The moment we invest in something, we fall in love with it," Ariely said, which applies to something as sentimental as children or as trivial as origami.
That puts real estate agents in a precarious position of pricing a house to sell, but not insulting the homeowner by recommending a lower asking price. To a homeowner, a low but realistic listing price is "like someone calling your kids ugly," Ariely said with a laugh.

Headset, go rent “Tropic Thunder” and laugh for a couple of hours.

Will do. Only I must show Party loyalty. Therefore I will buy instead of rent, while paying with a credit card. Then I will use the Obama stimulus check to make a down payment on a new Sony 60in flat panel so I can watch it in fitting style.

run up the debt so far that there is no danger that the democracts can bring it down again before the game is over.

It does appear that W (with LOTS of Democrat help) is running up the debt just before he leaves office.

Headset,

you seem to think that they will get away with this for some reason. I tend to think they will fail in their efforts.

The only thing that is holding up the seller psychology (aka denial or delusional psychology) is his job.

There is only one kind of seller psychology left when the cash flow runs out, desperation. We will get there.

There is only one kind of seller psychology left when the cash flow runs out, desperation.
Here are some random notes from the frontlines:
I know someone with an IT consulting business, and he's had to move some of his employees from full time to part time due to declining business.
Someone else, who does legal aid type work, noted that one of their clients has a landlord who is trying to "renegotiate" her lease, even though this person is on a Section 8 voucher (rents are fixed). Evidently, the landlord owns several buildings and is having "cash flow" issues. Section 8 is guaranteed payments, so you know this landlord is in real trouble.
Some rumors and innuendo from Socketsite:
A regular rents a $1million+ home in Lamorinda (some of the top schools in the state) for less than $4k a month. The landlord owns several more recently acquired, leveraged properties that aren't selling.
Another woman owns a couple of marginal rentals and has bought houses for her two kids (way in the future -- wouldn't want them priced out after college). Anyway, they bleed as much as $500 a month on some of their places, but it is no big deal as they are two high income wage earners. Not a problem -- until is becomes one.
Still seems like a lot a deleveraging to come in the real estate arena.

Jing Hua Wu Bing Bing Broke

EBGuy,

I just got back from a Taxi convention is Tampa, which was attended by mostly large fleet operators from all over the USA and Canada. What I heard from other attendees is the same as what I am experiencing - the number of people applying to drive taxis is increasing, while the amount of passengers is decreasing. Here in VA, driver applicants have tripled since last year, but ridership has decreased about 10%. This would indicate people need jobs, and that disposable income for households and agencies has decreased. The regional city bus folks have said bus ridership has increased.

Regarding FDR’s Record:

FDR did many things in a well intended effort to resolve the Great Depression. But the state of the art in economics was not so great at the time. Accordingly, some mistakes were made, and the recovery was delayed/impaired because of it. FDR did what he/they thought was best. Many of his policies were helpful, but some turned out to be detrimental.

However, the worst mistakes were made well before FDR was even elected. Severely tight monetary policy combined with protectionist trade policies and higher taxes turned what should have been only a significant recession (1928+) into a severe collapse (1929-1933).

FDR came into office after all of this had already occurred. He inherited one hell of a mess. And he wasted no time in taking action. If economic knowledge had been better he would have made fewer mistakes and the depression would have ended well before WWII. However, it is not fair to judge him based on what we know now. He had to take action with what was known at the time.

BTW, Leave it to the NY Times to exaggerate or fabricate facts (SOP for them). During the 40 or so years that I have seen, heard and read reports about the Great Depression, the accepted and respected estimate of unemployment has always been a likely peak of somewhere around 15%, with a possible worst case of perhaps 25%. The NY Times claims 33%. This is the first time that I have ever heard any estimate above 25%.

Zephyr says: If economic knowledge had been better he would have made fewer mistakes and the depression would have ended well before WWII. However, it is not fair to judge him based on what we know now. He had to take action with what was known at the time.

Zephyr, you've got to be joking, right?

If we're so damned good at economic knowledge now, then how did we arrive at our present vast debacle in the first place? People can look back and criticize FDR, but they only offer alternative theories on how things might have played out. That implies the academics could know the unintended effects of implementing their own theories, which is almost definitely not the case. Such events play out infrequently on the world stage, and are of such scale that culture, government policy, global situation, natural resources and a host of other factors can distort the final results.

Case in point---if Bernanke is such a student of the Great Depression and other economic catastophes, why aren't the warning signs abating already? Give it another 50 years, and economists will have all sorts of great theories on how we could have fixed this problem much better, except that our knowledge of economics was primitive and unsophisticated at the beginning of the 21st century.

:o

Tivo layoff:

Nov 18 (Reuters) - TiVo Inc:

ANNOUNCES PLAN TO REDUCE OPERATIONAL EXPENSES PRIMARILY THROUGH REDUCTION IN
headcount - filing

EXPECTS PRE-TAX CHARGES OF APPROX $1 MILLION PRIMARILY FOR EMPLOYEE-RELATED
severance benefits and out-placement costs

EXPECTS TO RECORD THESE CHARGES IN Q4 OF FISCAL YEAR 2009 ENDING JANUARY 31,
2009 - filing

“If we’re so damned good at economic knowledge now, then how did we arrive at our present vast debacle in the first place?”

We are in this mess because people still get caught up in manias - and always will. People do stupid things, and take excessive risks. It is nearly impossible to prevent bubble manias.

Further, even with better economic knowledge people still make mistakes, and Greenspan’s super easy monetary policy was a huge mistake. It was gasoline on the fire, and was the primary cause of the real estate bubble and mortgage crisis that started this financial panic.

And yes we will gain knowledge from studying this crisis. Just as we have learned from the many other panics and financial meltdowns that have occurred since the Great Depression in various places and times.

But that does not mean we will be able to prevent the next one. We know more than ever about medicine, and people still get very sick. We understand how earthquakes work. Why can’t we prevent them? This inability does not disprove our increased knowledge.

SNL on the big 3 automaker congressional hearings:

http://videocafe.crooksandliars.com/media/play/wmv/6836/24222

Case Shiller is out.

SFO now at 145.53
Down 3.89% MOM
Down 29.51% YOY
Down 33.36% from Peak

Accelerating my model to 2% MOM depreciation we can reach equilibrium by April 2009. This means reverting to norm using the BA price appreciation of 4.25% a year.

It is clear that we will overshoot equilibrium. Up to now I have been quoting corrections to return us FROM the bubble. We simply now must begin to factor in the credit crunch and the recession. Guessing that the recession lasts at least 2 more years and that prices seem likely to fall at their current rate through that period, we could see 1998 pricing in early 2011. This means most RE is simply unthinkable until late 2010 as we are seeing YOY declines in excess of 20%. Um, unless you do not mind your 20% down payment being immediately vaporized.

Headset,
Not sure what else you folks discuss at conventions... What is the word on the street regarding maintenance costs for hybrid fleets?

mickrussom,

I think your tinfoil hat is on too tight.

http://www.coinlink.com/Articles/top-ten/the-top-ten-largest-gold-reserves-in-bullion/

I guess its possibly Fort Knox is full of gold-painted bricks; but when you think about it anything is possible, really.

If the SHF in a major way we can just roll the military into NYC and seize the Federal Reserve building and confiscate all the other countries gold as well. What would stop us?b

What is the word on the street regarding maintenance costs for hybrid fleets?

That was a major topic. The New York City fleets owners had nothing good to say about hybrids. They strongly discouraged anyone from using them. On the other hand, the owner of a large Phoenix/Scottsdale company recently put 200 Prius hybrids in one of his fleets. He was very happy with them. The difference may be that the New Yorkers are looking at Ford Escapes, while the Phoenix folks are using Toyotas.

Duke, I have a similar view of the cycle timing. I think price declines will continue into 2010, but I expect that 2010 will be nearly flat overall. I see no reason to buy before then. In fact, I will wait until I see a beginning of price increases.

As an investor there is no reason to rush in - RE prices recover very slowly at first. If you aare buying for personal use you will have other needs that could accelerate your move.

30 year Mortgage rates below 5%

I bow to out mint masters.

typo: I bow to our mint masters.

sa,

that mortgage rate monitor table is showing 5.98%.

It's always interesting to check in and see what the CME has to say about the market. Next stop for Ess Eff (and environs) is 122.0 in May 2009 (an approximately 16% drop from where we currently stand). Looks like the market likes you prediction, Duke.

OO,

I suspect, It might show up tomorrow.

PermaRenter Says:
Tivo layoff:
EXPECTS PRE-TAX CHARGES OF APPROX $1 MILLION PRIMARILY FOR EMPLOYEE-RELATED severance benefits and out-placement costs

If the charge is only 1 million, it probably is a small layoff. (Temps and contractors are not counted, of course)

I just called a loan agent, 5.5%, already reflected in this rate, for $417K conforming or below, 75% LTV max, that is the best they can do.

No drop for non-conforming jumbo.

The funding for the above quote is from Chase and Wells Fargo and reflects the latest drop.

If we really just dropped the 30 year rate to 4.875 by direct governeent intervention - wow. Just wow.
That will: help clear inventory, prop up prices, re-emply people into finance (to handle the re-fi load), help stabailize property tax incomes to states. It is an amazing, if expensive, method to buy time until the public works programs can ramp up. In fact, that lower rate in interest paid savings may compare directly over a 30 year period to current lost equity.

Normally I would hate this kind of massive housing intervention, but in terms of staving-off our spiral into Depression, at first blush this looks really smart.

Yeah, and as a result of this intervention, Euro is again above 1.3

So, its boosting exports and hindering imports. . .

(lets just ignore the destruction of value of the dollar and savings)

Hmm. Gentleman, I give you the Bigger Bubble. The Government.

OK, just called up Chase, my home loan servicer and bag holder, here is what they are offering, all fixed

5.25% for 30 years, fee $2,500
5.25% for 15 years, fee $4,100
5.25% for 10 years, fee $3,600

Now can you tell me which loan do the banks and the government want to herd everybody into?

If it really drops below 5%, I will refinance to the 10yr fixed, but so far I will still wait for our government to pull an even bigger wonder :-)

@OO

I thought you sold your house and were renting. Are you planning to buy again soon?

I don't understand one thing, if they are encouraging good behavior, why don't they intervene while letting the market reflect the risk of time lag.

Shouldn't 10-yr loan be always priced lower than 30-yr? The loan is paid off faster, it is subject to shorter time lag in which any black swan can happen, why would the government herd everyone to a 30yr loan?

No, I didn't sell, when I was planning to sell came the deleveraging in which everything was whacked down very violently and it looked like things were coming off the wheel very fast. I didn't want to be caught in the middle of that.

I am not actively looking for refi, but if the terms are good, why not?

@Danville,

If they really manage to manipulate rates to below 5% for 30-yr fixed loan, and if you have a load of cash which can qualify for conforming, it may not be a bad time to buy.

While price can still come down, you won't see such a good rate for a long time to come, because our government cannot get away with rates being so low and USD being so high. This will be a brief window of deflation coupled with low interest rate that you can take advantage of. What you should look at is not just the housing price, but the total housing payment. You may buy at a higher price but a lower interest payment, or at a lower price but a higher interest payment, you need to look at what the TOTAL payment is, not just the housing price.

We have enjoyed a very low interest rate for a long time, this will have to change. And if our government is raw printing to keep the Treasury yield down, at some point USD will simply collapse and you'd better off to hold some land than cash.

That will: help clear inventory, prop up prices, re-emply people into finance (to handle the re-fi load), help stabailize property tax incomes to states

I do see some people would try to refinance and few people might be hired for it. Propping up prices would be more difficult. I have a 15 year fixed at 5.125%. I wouldn’t be excited till I see a 3 handle on rates. We are entering a phase of steepest job losses and I can’t think of any sector of economy that is holding up strong. More inventory would be dumped onto market due to job losses. No interest rate could help people without a paychek.

My loan agent sounded pissed that I didn't want to go through with refinance (I unfortunately have a 10-yr fixed @5.5%, and only 8.5 years left). So I need the rate to get down to at least below 4.5% for me to be motivated to contribute pts and closing fees to my loan agent.

But I do think that if the rate can get down to 4.x% or even below 4%, the economy will get a big boost, we will have added a few music chairs to keep it going. It is not like half of the country is unemployed, there are still people with jobs, and nobody doesn't like refinancing to a lower rate if they already have a job and a home, which will be more than 50% of the American household. That is a lot of refinancing. But of course, after this is done, then what?

It is of course given that USD will be worthless by then, but don't you love to lock in a long-term low rate to pay back worthless dollars?

Mick,

Whelp, the ole' chestnut about the Fort Knox being full of nothing but hot air is a favorite amongst the conspiracy theory buffs.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Bullion_Depository#Conspiracy_theory

So I calls 'em like eye sees' em'.

Peter Schiff has tinfoil headgear in the family; ever hear of Irwin Schiff?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irwin_Schiff

So no surprise he has a chip on his shoulder against a US government. A very costly chip I might add, as his funds got *murdered* this year.

The mistake he made was to think the bubble was in the U.S. and all the real growth was in emerging markets, oil and foreign currency. He bet the farm on a dollar collapse against these asset classes. Unfortunately for him, it turns out the bubbles overseas were just as bad (if not worse) than the ones here and everything fell the other way.

I freely admit that we are in deep doo-doo as a debtor nation; as we are either going to end up being indentured servants to our Asian overseers or sell off our assets (including that gold bullion) at fire sale prices to pay off our creditors.

Re:Ron Paul. He is Magneto at the end of the last Xmen movie. Cranky, crazy old fart sitting alone in the park feeding pigeons, trying to move chess pieces with his mind.

OO, I wouldn't get a new loan either. 5.5% fixed is still nothing to sneeze at.