« First « Previous Comments 52 - 53 of 53 Search these comments
bob2356
>Yes but lots more corn gets grown by republican voters in the red states than sugar cane.
I really hate the hypocrisy here with these beneficiaries of federal money.
edvard2 says
>That said, if subsidies go away for starters a LOT of farmers would go bust pretty quick.
I am skeptical about this claim. Data?
I don't know who gave you the "dislike" Thunderlips, but you are right.
« First « Previous Comments 52 - 53 of 53 Search these comments
The US spends $10-$30B/ year subsidizing corn, wheat, soybeans, cotton, sugar, and other crops (even tobacco). Many of the farm are corporate mega farms these days. What do you all think?
Wikipedia gives figures:
Agricultural subsidy
and
Agricultural Subsidies (Cato.org)
I hesitate to use Huffingtonpost as a source anymore, but here goes:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/11/14/farm-subsidies-politicians-who-get-them-_n_783322.html
Though a few years old, no less relevant today:
How to Spend an Extra $15 Billion (Washington Post interactive)
Newest bad idea:
Farmers Facing Loss of Subsidy May Get New One (NY Times)