« First « Previous Comments 53 - 64 of 64 Search these comments
I only pointed out that the report stated 15% decline over the past year, and I found it suspect that a 2.5% decline for a two week period did not seem to jive with that, because if you annualized that rate of decline it would be 90% in one year. Where is the support for the 2.5% decline in the past two weeks? There isn’t any, the adjustment was arbitrary.
Where do you come up with the idea that 15% is completely inaccurate because the 2 week trend doesnt EXACTLY match the rate of depreciation stated annually? If that were a requirement, then me saying, "Home prices are up 40% in the last 10 years, but are down 20% in the last 2 years." Would be a completely fallacious and ridiculous statement. Surely a man of your intellectual stature can see the foolishness of that conclusion. Just because the "proof" was not provided directly in the report (it's not required to be furnished, yet she probably still has it) doesn't mean "there isn't any."
Look, three things are painfully obvious here:
1) Your opinion of yourself borders on megalomaniacal
2) You have absolutely no idea what methods are used to complete and appraisal, and just like the "idiot appraiser" you hate so much....are pulling numbers and calculations out of your ass just to make your case.
3) Your opinion on this matter will not change. You are pissed, you want everyone else to join the pity-party, and have no intention of actually educating youself on the matter.
Schizlor,
I never said 15% was inaccurate, only mentioned that C-S doesn't support that - and the two week trend isn't even close. Thats the question. I would think if a two week trend really was SIX times the annual trend it may be worth mentioning.
Come on, you know as well as I that there is no 2 week trend if only five comps have sold in the past three months. With such a small sample size there is barely a 3 month trend. Tell you what, I'll bet you a nickel she doesn't have "proof" of a 2 week trend of 2.5% decline.
On second thought, you're right. I am making it all up. Appraisers are infallible professionals and this report is worth its weight in diamonds.
See you guys later. I'm going to go have my pity-party all by myself.
And BTW...for all of you out there who are dumbfounded that the appraiser is not eager to "take the full tour" from you when they arrive...let me explain why this is the case.
They are not previewing the home to see how "desireable" it is. They don't give a shit about your cabinets, or granite countertops, or what shade of white you've painted the baby's room. They aren't interested in how you rewired the den so you have 7.1 in there...they don't care about all the little nuances that you feel makes the home so special. So don't get offended, nor think they are being negligent, when they ask you to leave them alone and let them check the home out.
What they are looking for is simple stuff:
-Room count (does it say 3 BR but you only have 2, or have turned one into 2 so you now have 4?)
-Does the liveable square footage jive with what's been reported before? To that point, anything even partially below grade (ground) level is NOT considered in the square footage or room count. So if you have a basement apartment, it won't be included on the report. (People who finish basements often accuse appraisers of "not counting" the new space. They are not allowed to if it's below ground)
-Are there any glaring deficiencies in the home which, if not fixed, would cause me to downgrade the value of this house because were they not fixed the liveability of the home would be affected. Things like open holes in exterior walls that can let the elements in. Rotting window sills. Extensive mold. Noticeable cracks in the foundation. -These things need to be reported and noted on the report as needing to be fixed prior to that appraised value being certified, or they'll have to adjust the value downward.
This is why they can do an 8 minute appraisal. 98% of the work they do is done with county records, and a caculator. Research and math is the majority of the actual appraisal. Granted the quality of this research and math varies wildly across the industry.
But this isn't Antiques Roadshow. It's not like, If only the appraiser had just spent more time analyzing my window treatments, he'd have picked up on that minor detail that clued him in on that hidden "value" we have here!! But he left after 10 min. We got shafted!"
You're house is not telling him what it's worth. The other houses that just sold are. He is just making sure that yours are up to par with the one's that sold, which, having already been appraised, are certified "not shitboxes" by the reviewing appraiser. When they walk through your home, they are looking for deficiencies. They are looking for things that would LOWER the value of your home. Those of you who got the 5 minute breeze-through should be happy....it means your home was perfectly up to snuff and he had seen enough. It's a good thing. Now he's off to figure out the market value of the home.
..."was one of the funniest things I have seen on patrick.net."
Happy to amuse you, that's why we’re here, right? No skin in the game. Now, go take your principles class. Real estate and commodities are two separate entities. Also, you didn’t wish me luck fishing, that was rude !
Come on, you know as well as I that there is no 2 week trend if only five comps have sold in the past three months.
I agree that this data probably is flimsy at best, seeing as how most numbers on "current" trends are at least a month behind. I'd guess the only place they'd be able to pull numbers like that is the MLS.
Tell you what, I’ll bet you a nickel she doesn’t have “proof†of a 2 week trend of 2.5% decline.
I'll concede that is a likelihood
On second thought, you’re right. I am making it all up. Appraisers are infallible professionals and this report is worth its weight in diamonds.
I'm not saying that. I'm just saying, you picking on the appraiser seems a bit odd. I think it's because you're obviously in a "numbers" field and feel insulted that someone with 1/15th the training as you gets paid $450 to service you. That's all well and good. It just seems odd that of all people on your list, the appraiser made #1, above say:
Real Estate Agent
Appraiser
Seller's Agent
Seller themselves
Usually the one who bitches about an appraiser is someone trying to refinance and doesn't "get the value" they wanted (ie, sorry dude..you're underwater) OR it is someone who is trying to sell, but again gets "shafted" by the appraiser who ruins the deal with a low appraisal. I've never heard of someone getting a great deal on the home, the appraisal supporting the deal perfectly, and then bitching about the malfeasance of the appraiser. Usually it's alls-well-that-ends-well. If you showed me the HUD-1, I guarantee you I could point out half a dozen fees you paid that were far more outlandish and unjustified than the appraisal.
But if you want to run with it being a travesty of justice, have at it.
It is not very important, but I just wanted to correct your math david1. A 2.5% decrease in 2 weeks does not correspond to a 90% decrease over a year. Similarly a 4% decrease in 6 weeks does not correspond to a 40% decrease over a year. Your math:
1.025 ^ (52/2) = 1.90
1.04 ^ (52/6) = 1.40
shows yearly increases. For the yearly decrease you should do:
(1-0.025)^(52/2) ~= 0.51775 (a YOY decrease of 48.225%)
(1-0.04)^(52/6) ~= 0.70203 (a YOY decrease of 29.797%)
Your math shows how much they appreciate YOY given appreciations in 2 and 6 weeks, respectively. The first appreciates 90%, the second appreciates 40%. That can be used to approximate the depreciation (won't be exactly same) as:
(1.90-1.0)/1.90 = 47.368%
(1.40-1.0)/1.40 = 28.571%
And appreciation of 90% won't be reverted by a depreciation of 90%. Simplest case, an appreciation of 100% will revert with a depreciation of 50%.
Actually, why stop at appraisers, realtors, etc.? As an appraiser, I can tell you what the main problem is. Our wise and generous government has reduced the appraisal industry to a few newbies who are willing to tell their client anything for $200. I use to take pride when I saved the bank or the buyer a lot of money because they were too inexperienced to recognize they were getting screwed by the seller and their realtor. Now with mandatory appraiser rotation, why should the experienced and ethical appraiser try any harder than Skippy who last week was flipping burgers but now has his appraisal license?
So, now where do you go for an honest deal? I can't buy a car, hire a plumber, electrician, lawyer, etc. I can't buy anything because everything made is cheap and expensive. Can't get insurance because I don't work for the government and not on welfare (yet). I can go on, but since you are obviously the only honest (and possibly smartest) guy left, I would only bore you.
David: This is now the funniest thing I've read on Patrick.net and I'm laughing w/ya.
I'll buy the pie for both of us. Where do you want to eat it?
ps. Hope you all are doing okay back in NC. Those were some hard punches !
This is exactly the "catch a falling knife" feeling.
Don't blame the "Appraiser" because you overpaid.
If you want to feel good, buy a house when the price is raising.
Currently, the house price is still falling.
« First « Previous Comments 53 - 64 of 64 Search these comments
So I just bought a house, close at the end of the month. Price is fine, mortgage payment will be less than equivalent rent by at least 20% and the PITI is less than 18% of my income (Not counting wife's at all)
Now that all of that is out of the way, I noticed something interesting on the appraisal. Granted, I consider myself to be a local market "expert" (its why I bought this particular house afterall) I was thinking we probably paid about 35K under comp value. I On the appraisal we bought it for 7k under appraised value. No big deal to me, it appraised and that was all I was looking for I guess.
But in looking at the appraisal more closely, a few things jumped out at me:
1. The report identifies 5 total comparable sold homes in the last three months with a median price of, lets say 250K. It specifically uses three comparable homes in the determination of the price; the lowest of these three is 275K. It is not possible to have a median 250K of a group of 5 numbers in which 3 of the five all exceed 250K by definition.
2. The report quotes prices declining 15% YOY in this marketplace. I would say that is ambitious because Case-Shiller pegs it at about half that, and I have been studying this market for the past six months and I would say it is flat, but again, whatever. Then she adjusts the sale prices of each comp based upon this 15% YOY decline. The only caveat is, on all of the comps, this is done incorrectly. For example, she reduced in price a comp that sold two weeks ago 2.5%, and another than sold 6 weeks ago 4%. Those are 90% and 40% annualized declines by my math.
3. All of the comps are in a similar, within one mile, neighborhood. But there is a difference and anyone who drove through these neighborhoods would see that. One neighborhood is all brick homes on wooded lots with lake or golf course views, where the comp neighborhoods are stucco/siding in new developments, where all of the trees have been cleared and one backyard backs up to another, without any lakeview. My neighborhood has homes that are on average 1000+ sq ft. larger, and sell for and are listed for 100K more or so. Again on the average.
Basically, I think with all of the garbage that happened with appraisals a few years ago, the appraiser now just goes to the house, looks around, looks at the contract purchase price, eyeballs that that is a fair price, and adds 5-10K for the appraised value. Then she massages comp numbers to back up that price.
All of that would be fine except I paid $450 for it. That is is complete ripoff, especially for an absolute forgery like it is. I really resent paying such a sum for something that really has no value at all, nor basis in fact. The bank wants it to loan me the money, and it appraised so I guess thats all good...but I just hate the fact that $450 of my hard earned money went into the pocket of this moron just because she took a night school class on real estate appraisal. I am quite certain the highest IQ in the class including the instructor didn't top 90.
#housing