0
0

Why Ron Paul is doomed


 invite response                
2011 Aug 15, 4:51am   9,444 views  85 comments

by Vicente   ➕follow (1)   💰tip   ignore  

1. Corporate "people" do not support him, in fact they work to undercut his campaign
2. Because posts like this are far too common from his rabid supporters:

by Hive Raid
on Sun, 08/14/2011 - 16:19
#1559477

"Ron Paul will cause the next holocaust."

- actual quote from a Jew on an article yesterday

Why is Ron Paul unelectable, while Bachmann is a frontrunner? Simple. Bachmann is a traitor, loyal to Israel, the Jewish banking oligarchy, and the Jewish mainstream media oligarchy. Ron Paul is a patriotic American, who would prioritize the needs of Americans over the Jews.

Jews will use their control of the West to prevent him from winning, legally or illegally. And if by some miracle he wins... they'll do him like they did JFK--the last president to threaten the Jewish federal reserve bank.

Ugly truth, but the elephant in the room has been getting fatter and shitting on all the furniture. Can't sit comfortably any more.

From here:

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/media-admits-ignoring-ron-paul?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+zerohedge%2Ffeed+%28zero+hedge+-+on+a+long+enough+timeline%2C+the+survival+rate+for+everyone+drops+to+zero%29

« First        Comments 85 - 85 of 85        Search these comments

85   MisdemeanorRebel   2011 Aug 18, 6:14am  

corntrollio says

But Democrats ARE center-right. See Political Compass. We don't have a true left party here besides maybe the Greens who don't poll well, as I pointed out earlier. I don't think Ron Paul is the right candidate for that, but that's a valid point that I made too.

I also don't see this happening from the top down. What would be better is if a third party started getting Congressional seats in states with open primaries. You are not going to create a viable third way with a presidential election.

I agree, the Democrats are now a center-right party.

I also agree about Congressional seats, but that won't happen for two reasons: First, the antiquated assignment of Representatives to Districts (no longer necessary thanks to the telegraph, much less the telephone and digitalization) makes them prone to co-option by powerful constituencies in their district - and not necessarily their own voters. Feinstein (CA - major intel/defense state), Frank (Upper Class Boston suburbs like Brookline - FIRE back offices), and Dodd (CT, same situation as Frank) are great examples. Second, if just getting one officer on the ballot for president is a manpower and financial hardship for third parties, getting multiple candidates in several districts is even harder - the rules are often just as stringent for House and Senate seats as they are for non-major party Presidential candidates.

corntrollio says

I also don't see this happening from the top down. What would be better is if a third party started getting Congressional seats in states with open primaries. You are not going to create a viable third way with a presidential election.

It sounds good to me. I actually would love the SCOTUS to rule that all ballot access laws should be the same for any candidate, regardless of Party - or lack of party - affiliation.

Given the way the US is structured today, politicians and corporations must re-learn to fear the public, or the public must lose their apathy on a grand scale.

« First        Comments 85 - 85 of 85        Search these comments

Please register to comment:

api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   random   suggestions   gaiste