1
0

If you can't bear to hear opposing opinions, don't moderate a post.


 invite response                
2013 Jan 18, 1:48am   16,527 views  44 comments

by edvard2   ➕follow (1)   💰tip   ignore  

Simple enough. If you post a political post, then you should expect there to be a debate between people who disagree with each other. If that's the case and you then in turn decide to delete any comments that are contrary to your own ideas then you shouldn't post one to start with.

That is all.

« First        Comments 41 - 44 of 44        Search these comments

41   edvard2   2013 Jan 22, 6:33am  

CaptainShuddup says

Come on he just swore in office on TWO bibles, one was tied to Lincoln and the other one was Kings bible. His ministry of propaganda called him this generation's Kennedy the day he was sworn in the first term.

Those Bibles are a part of US history. Its an historic ceremony and every single inauguration uses historical artifacts, tradition, and places. I believe you're reading wayyyyy too much into this.

42   Thedaytoday   2013 Jan 22, 6:37am  

edvard2 says

Those Bibles are a part of US history. Its an historic ceremony and every single inauguration uses historical artifacts, tradition, and places. I believe you're reading wayyyyy too much into this.

No, he is simply a racist bigoted fool. He think his family values are the only important ones. He is brain dead.

43   Thedaytoday   2013 Jan 22, 6:38am  

CaptainShuddup says

Come on he just swore in office on TWO bibles, one was tied to Lincoln and the other one was Kings bible. His ministry of propaganda called him this generation's Kennedy the day he was sworn in the first term.

Hows your ministry of racism and bigotry, fool!

44   elliemae   2013 Jan 23, 1:13am  

CaptainShuddup says

...Oh and use some of that unemployment money to buy an apostrophe, will ya?

Thanks, TPB! Fucking Hilarious! (I'm a little bit in love with you right now...)

I haven't been watching this thread, mostly because I have a life and therefore have been kinda busy. But from what I can tell, the gist of the thread is the following:

IDDQD says

Name calling is legit target for deletion, no question about that.

CaptainShuddup says

Oh yeah back to the thread, xxy something or another, you're an asshole.

Just keeping the thread on track with civil discussion.

Homeboy says

The typical Patnet post IS demented right wing diatribe.

CaptainShuddup says

OH bullshit, you don't have to hate someone to recognize they are full of shit.

Thedaytoday says

A bigot says what?

Thedaytoday says

Your a bigot.

(maybe he is - maybe he isn't - but he does have a point about using apostrophes...)

Thedaytoday says

Racist bigot

Better - although no "period" at the end, signifying you had completed that thought process.

Thedaytoday says

No, he is simply a racist bigoted fool. He think his family values are the only important ones. He is brain dead.

Thedaytoday says

Hows your ministry of racism and bigotry, fool!

The best explanation is the one below:

turtledove says

Threads should run their course without manipulation, IMHO. It's more interesting that way. You learn more from people with opposing views. Either they convince you of something new... Or their arguments help to solidify the opinion you already held. And... name callers hurt their own credibility. No deletion required.... Which should be obvious to anyone who isn't a stupid moron.

See... Now did that last line make YOU feel bad or ME look ridiculous?

Messages get lost in the hyperbole and name calling. Eventually, it all comes back to "Libs bad, Conservatives good," only with childish personal attacks. The only thing that would make it more entertaining would be the "your mom" slams of the 80's...

« First        Comments 41 - 44 of 44        Search these comments

Please register to comment:

api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   random   suggestions