3
0

Boomers most likely to buy a new car


 invite response                
2013 Aug 5, 8:27am   14,812 views  54 comments

by Heraclitusstudent   ➕follow (8)   💰tip   ignore  

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-08-05/automania-strikes-boomers-supplanting-kids-as-buyers.html

The 55-to-64-year-old age group, the oldest of the boomers, has become the cohort most likely to buy a new car...

The whole economy is build around the savingless boomers continuing their self-indulgent ways now like they were 10 years ago.

« First        Comments 41 - 54 of 54        Search these comments

41   marcus   2013 Aug 6, 3:42am  

CaptainShuddup says

Like with EVERYTHING with Liberals they don't want Fairness, they want SPECIAL.

In other words you have no perspective on how much the media and politics have changed in the last thirty years. When people talk about how Reagan or Bob Dole would be considered RINOs in todays political environment, you just change the subject.

42   zzyzzx   2013 Aug 6, 4:42am  

Article title should really be:

People with most money most likely to buy a new car.

43   marcus   2013 Aug 6, 4:43am  

CaptainShuddup says

Marcus, why do you even participate in Politics, discussion or voting for that matter. The only People hold accountable aren't even in office anymore.

So is it that you don't want to understand my point ? Or that you are unable ?

The point isn't that Reagan or Dole are relevant today. IT's that their ideological position would be far too liberal for todays republicans in congress. And I pose the question: Can you acknowledge this as true ?

Note: I didn't go way back to some of the truly liberal republicans such as Charles Percy that were in congress in the 1960s and early 70s. IF you go back that far, a conservative was someone who didn't want to cut taxes because of the dangers of deficits.

These days we have warped ideology based on lies, distractions and outright propaganda war between the two parties. But the more liberal of the two parties (the democratic party) is to the right of where republicans were 30 years ago.

These are just observations. It's fascinating really. Especially the way that you don't deny it, and seem to believe that somehow it's justified.

44   zzyzzx   2013 Aug 6, 4:55am  

marcus says

The point isn't that Reagan or Dole are relevant today. IT's that their ideological position would be far too liberal for todays republicans in congress. And I pose the question: Can you acknowledge this as true ?

No, Dole was always considered to be a more moderate Republican, even in his day.

45   Tenpoundbass   2013 Aug 6, 5:00am  

OK Let's discuss Bob Doyle if you think kicking him in the balls will solve anything with this administration.
Hey why not?

46   Heraclitusstudent   2013 Aug 6, 5:13am  

sbh says

The opportunity to become something different than you had planned.

You mean the opportunity to default, dumpster dive and squat unsold foreclosures?

The economy is fucked ( less than 2%), the stock market is fucked (less than peak 13yrs ago in real terms), employment is fucked (millions below peak), wages are fucked (median is down). The only thing that is not low is what millennials have to pay for: over priced housing, over priced education, and over priced healthcare. These grew nicely.

47   marcus   2013 Aug 6, 5:15am  

zzyzzx says

Dole was always considered to be a more moderate Republican, even in his day

Today moderation in the republican party is forbidden. If you don't sign the Norquist tax pledge, and if you don't go along with the other extreme right wing policies, and obstruction plans, they'll fund a tea party candidate to run against you.

March in step with the right wing, or be replaced.

48   Heraclitusstudent   2013 Aug 6, 5:21am  

sbh says

If any individual uses this argument to justify personal paralysis then he has no grasp of his individual problems:

Paralysis? We are not talking about me (I'm gen Y) or any specific individual, we are talking of a generation as a whole.

And as a generation they are screwed.

The question is: what happens when boomers head to oblivion and no one replaces them? How will they maintain the veil of illusory wealth then?

49   Heraclitusstudent   2013 Aug 6, 6:05am  

sbh says

For an entire generation to to put their future on "hibernate" is an act of cowardice as well as a failure to grasp the better lesson, namely, that we live as we choose.

You are right. And when they come out of hibernation they will do what they must: throw down the rotten financial system, reject past debts, defund unsustainable entitlements, vote down laws designed to inflate their costs, etc...

As a result, the remaining boomers will kiss their 401Ks and over-priced housing goodbye, and they'll be the ones singing in the subway and dumpster diving. But hey... they can always decide to "live as they choose".

50   Shaman   2013 Aug 6, 6:34am  

That's actually what I did. Graduated with 50k debt, got a job in a hell hole in Alaska, and worked like an angry bastard for two years to pay it off. Then I worked one more year to get some FU money, quit, and moved to California debt free.

51   anonymous   2013 Aug 6, 7:29am  

In the 90's, everyone and anyone was giving out loans, and it didn't take much if any documented income to get tens of thousands of dollars worth of credit. Seeing as how you can't purge school loans in bankruptcy court, the move was to pay off student loans with credit cards and personal loans, then pay a bk attorney with some of that borrowed money, to press the reset button for you.

52   Heraclitusstudent   2013 Aug 6, 7:31am  

Quigley says

That's actually what I did. Graduated with 50k debt, got a job in a hell hole in Alaska, and worked like an angry bastard for two years to pay it off. Then I worked one more year to get some FU money, quit, and moved to California debt free.

Congratz! Now you can go $500K in debt to buy a house from a boomer at inflated prices or you can crawl back to the "hole" in Alaska (probably less of a hole than California).
Wouldn't you say that's more or less painless?

53   drew_eckhardt   2013 Aug 6, 7:59am  

I'm pleasantly surprised that the world is starting to make sense.

In a sane world I'd expect people aged 55-64 to be buying the most new cars (average price: $30,748) since they're at the peak of their earning potential, have paid off their home loans, and gotten their spawn through college and out of the nest.

I expect children under 30 to be buying the fewest new cars since they've yet to max out their salaries, should be building an emergency fund of 12 months cash, are buying their first homes (median price $214,200), and if they've spawned or plan to should be saving for their childrens' odyssey years.

It used to irritate me when I saw younger people making less money buying bigger homes and newer cars than I did. Now I just smile knowing that I'll probably be working a few hundred hours a year as a hobby on the most interesting consulting projects like my father does until I get too tired and continue my middle class life style while they'll be forced to work full-time until later in life after which they'll have to scrape by on a fraction (Social Security can pay just 30%) of what they're used to.

54   dublin hillz   2013 Aug 6, 8:10am  

Heraclitusstudent says

Quigley says



That's actually what I did. Graduated with 50k debt, got a job in a hell hole in Alaska, and worked like an angry bastard for two years to pay it off. Then I worked one more year to get some FU money, quit, and moved to California debt free.


Congratz! Now you can go $500K in debt to buy a house from a boomer at inflated prices or you can crawl back to the "hole" in Alaska (probably less of a hole than California).
Wouldn't you say that's more or less painless?

It is always better to buy brand new from a builder than buy resale from a boomer. Always with no exceptions!

« First        Comments 41 - 54 of 54        Search these comments

Please register to comment:

api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   random   suggestions