« First « Previous Comments 145 - 148 of 148 Search these comments
Retarded strawman.
Btw, I never suggested that there shouldn't be substantial vetting.
Btw, I never suggested that there shouldn't be substantial vetting.
How do you vet in a refugee camp, with real but bribed (ie indistinguishable from the real thing, on the right paper with the right stamps after slipping a Syrian Bureaucrat $50) documents? FBI Agents are going to go into Aleppo dodging bullets and artillery fire to interview neighbors and ex-employers cowering in basements - if they're still there are all?
How much will it cost?
Vetting refugee claimants in a civil war is totally impractical.
Daddy Tsarnev's brothers and relatives laughed at his claim they were oppressed. They said Tsarnev watched a lot of Baywatch and thought by moving to the US, he'd get a red sportscar and be famous. The Immigration Service believed his bullshit.
Finally, if they are "Moderate Muslims", wouldn't the worst thing to do would be to send all the non-crazies out to Europe, Canada, and the USA? Then the only people left in Syria would be the Fundamentalists.
Until the whole world recognizes that Islam is a horrible religion that is not to be tolerated, but quarantined like a deadly infectious disease, we will have no peace.
Well said. Thanks.
How do you vet in a refugee camp,
If they believe in the sharia laws, they are terrorists.
« First « Previous Comments 145 - 148 of 148 Search these comments
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/09/11/world/middleeast/obama-directs-administration-to-accept-10000-syrian-refugees.html
sorry, but this is unacceptable. islam is utterly incompatible with democracy, freedom of speech, and freedom of religion.
sure, only 10% of them really really want to kill us, but that's still 1,000 people.
aid them somewhere else, just don't bring them here!