« prev   random   next »
1   FNWGMOBDVZXDNW   ignore (2)   2017 Oct 2, 7:16am   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (2)   quote        

If Mann were able to not fling a few epithets at an ignoramus like Rohrabacher who has contempt for scientific method, he would not be a man. As for the article, which is an exercise in rhetoric, the closing sentence sums it up: "If Mann’s behavior is representative of the seriousness of “mainstream” climate scientists, we should all reconsider the credibility of his message."

Rather than assessing the message itself, just attack the messenger and state that we should not believe the message based on the behavior of the person. Now that is contempt for science and logical thought.
2   Onvacation   ignore (2)   2017 Oct 2, 11:23am   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote        

YesYNot says

Rather than assessing the message itself, just attack the messenger and state that we should not believe the message based on the behavior of the person.

The message is apocalypse. The messenger lies and manipulates data to eliminate the little ice age, the MWP, and any natural climate variation so that he can scare kids into believing they will either drown or bake (or freeze) because of global warming climate change .
3   Quigley   ignore (0)   2017 Oct 2, 11:32am   ↑ like (2)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote        

I hear there's a new global warming apocalypse movie coming out! Figures that they are still trying to sell that fiction with ... more fiction!
4   Onvacation   ignore (2)   2017 Oct 3, 10:38am   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote        

The premise of climate change is that humanity has been going on for eons at more or less the same temperature and the recent rise in temperature is "unprecedented in human history and caused by industrial co2".

The alarmists deny the natural climate variability over the last 1000 years. They deny that the world was warmer than today during the Roman warm period and the medieval warm period. They deny the overwhelming effect of the sun and orbit on climate. They deny science and try to rewrite history.

The high priest of this religion, Mann, who created the hockey stick temperature graph, is being more discredited over time.

For one, the hockey stick predicted exponential warming which has not happened; a warming trend but nothing out of control.

More studies are showing that the warming is exaggerated. Mann has other problems that will come out in the lawsuits.

The propaganda continues.

Science requires civil debate and sensible solutions to factual problems.

The alarmists uncivil screeching about the melting ice and threatening you with physical violence for not believing is getting old.
5   MrMagic   ignore (9)   2017 Oct 3, 11:29am   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (1)   quote        

Onvacation says
For one, the hockey stick predicted exponential warming which has not happened; a warming trend but nothing out of control.


Well, it did warm like one degree over 120 years. That's exponential, right?




The Housing Trap
You're being set up to spend your life paying off a debt you don't need to take on, for a house that costs far more than it should. The conspirators are all around you, smiling to lure you in, carefully choosing their words and watching your reactions as they push your buttons, anxiously waiting for the moment when you sign the papers that will trap you and guarantee their payoff. Don't be just another victim of the housing market. Use this book to defend your freedom and defeat their schemes. You can win the game, but first you have to learn how to play it.
115 pages, $12.50

Kindle version available


about   best comments   contact   one year ago   suggestions