3
0

Should we institute temp bans?


 invite response                
2017 Nov 11, 8:05am   12,550 views  67 comments

by Goran_K   ➕follow (4)   💰tip   ignore  

#patnet

So far I think the new rules are working. The deleting of personal attacks seems to be working a lot better than “uncivil”.

However certain members are still having a hard time understanding the new rule. I’ve had to delete 5 straight personal attacks from errrc.

Should we institute a 24 hour ban for repeated offenses? Like being deleted 3-4 times and warned with no improvement?

« First        Comments 53 - 67 of 67        Search these comments

53   Goran_K   2017 Nov 12, 9:11am  

You can use the word libtard all you want as long as it’s not directed at someone personally.

Ok:
“Libtards are ruining the country.”

Not ok:
“You are a clueless fucking Libtard.”
54   anonymous   2017 Nov 12, 9:15am  

Onvacation says
anon_84d68 says
Errc was just making a point.

Errc was being vulgar, obnoxious, and rude. There are rules against uncivility around here and he broke them.


Since when?

I’ve been reading Patnet off and on since 2005. Patrick allowed a few posters to be so beyond rude and disruptive that it’s ridiculous to ask that all of a sudden, everyone else change course.

It’s akin to releasing the last few Jews from Auschwitz, and then telling them that their captors will be tasked with making sure that the Jews are civil. It’s an unrealistic expectation
55   anonymous   2017 Nov 12, 9:18am  

Goran_K says
You can use the word libtard all you want as long as it’s not directed at someone personally.

Ok:
“Libtards are ruining the country.”

Not ok:
“You are a clueless fucking Libtard.”

While ‘you libtards’ or anything along those lines is perfectly acceptable, because err, well fuck I don’t know.
56   Goran_K   2017 Nov 12, 9:19am  

anon_98513 says
Goran_K says
You can use the word libtard all you want as long as it’s not directed at someone personally.

Ok:
“Libtards are ruining the country.”

Not ok:
“You are a clueless fucking Libtard.”

While ‘you libtards’ or anything along those lines is perfectly acceptable, because err, well fuck I don’t know.


Show me the post.
57   anonymous   2017 Nov 12, 9:22am  

Goran_K says
anon_98513 says
Goran_K says
You can use the word libtard all you want as long as it’s not directed at someone personally.

Ok:
“Libtards are ruining the country.”

Not ok:
“You are a clueless fucking Libtard.”

While ‘you libtards’ or anything along those lines is perfectly acceptable, because err, well fuck I don’t know.


Show me the post.

Pretty much every post ever made by TPB for starters.
58   Goran_K   2017 Nov 12, 9:25am  

anon_98513 says
Goran_K says
anon_98513 says
Goran_K says
You can use the word libtard all you want as long as it’s not directed at someone personally.

Ok:
“Libtards are ruining the country.”

Not ok:
“You are a clueless fucking Libtard.”

While ‘you libtards’ or anything along those lines is perfectly acceptable, because err, well fuck I don’t know.


Show me the post.

Pretty much every post ever made by TPB for starters.


That’s not specific enough. We have a pretty good standard here of what gets zapped and what doesn’t. Show me a post and if it fails the standard, it gets zapped.
59   FuckTheMainstreamMedia   2017 Nov 12, 9:31am  

anon_98513 says
Goran_K says
You can use the word libtard all you want as long as it’s not directed at someone personally.

Ok:
“Libtards are ruining the country.”

Not ok:
“You are a clueless fucking Libtard.”

While ‘you libtards’ or anything along those lines is perfectly acceptable, because err, well fuck I don’t know.


So the actual problem isn’t the policy, it’s that you don’t understand the policy.

Or more accurately you’re playing at being obtuse because you think it makes a point(it doesn’t)
60   Onvacation   2017 Nov 12, 9:32am  

errc says
Patrick allowed a few posters to be so beyond rude and disruptive that it’s ridiculous to ask that all of a sudden, everyone else change course.

Maybe Patrick now wants a site where people are NOT vulgar, rude, and obnoxious.

I could be wrong about the vulgar part.

@patrick Do you consider vulgarity uncivil?

I do.
61   anonymous   2017 Nov 12, 9:41am  

Onvacation says
errc says
Patrick allowed a few posters to be so beyond rude and disruptive that it’s ridiculous to ask that all of a sudden, everyone else change course.

Maybe Patrick now wants a site where people are NOT vulgar, rude, and obnoxious.

I could be wrong about the vulgar part.

@patrick Do you consider vulgarity uncivil?

I do.

Yeah, pretty much at the time he let CiC back. Oh, hang on...
62   anonymous   2017 Nov 12, 9:43am  

Fucking White Male says
anon_98513 says
Goran_K says
You can use the word libtard all you want as long as it’s not directed at someone personally.

Ok:
“Libtards are ruining the country.”

Not ok:
“You are a clueless fucking Libtard.”

While ‘you libtards’ or anything along those lines is perfectly acceptable, because err, well fuck I don’t know.


So the actual problem isn’t the policy, it’s that you don’t understand the policy.

Or more accurately you’re plying at being obtuse because you think it makes a point(it doesn’t)

No, because the “rules” are not remotely applied even-handedly. The mere fact that you’ve popped up to chip in pretty much underscores my point given your posting history.
63   FuckTheMainstreamMedia   2017 Nov 12, 11:24am  

anon_98513 says
Fucking White Male says
anon_98513 says
Goran_K says
You can use the word libtard all you want as long as it’s not directed at someone personally.

Ok:
“Libtards are ruining the country.”

Not ok:
“You are a clueless fucking Libtard.”

While ‘you libtards’ or anything along those lines is perfectly acceptable, because err, well fuck I don’t know.


So the actual problem isn’t the policy, it’s that you don’t understand the policy.

Or more accurately you’re plying at being obtuse because you think it makes a point(it doesn’t)

No, because the “rules” are not remotely applied even-handedly. The mere fact that you’ve popped up to chip in pretty much underscores my point given your posting history.


The rules, in practice, just popped up.

Now you are being unintentionally obtuse. Not to mention disingenuous.
64   Patrick   2017 Nov 12, 3:47pm  

Onvacation says
patrick Do you consider vulgarity uncivil?


Not necessarily. Vulgarity can be good natured. Consider AF. Usually vulgar, but rarely if ever uncivil.

The essence of civility is a subtext of good will toward the other users.
65   Strategist   2017 Nov 12, 4:36pm  

Patrick says

Not necessarily. Vulgarity can be good natured. Consider AF. Usually vulgar, but rarely if ever uncivil.


He is a good barbarian. I like him.
66   FuckTheMainstreamMedia   2017 Nov 12, 6:43pm  

Strategist says
Patrick says

Not necessarily. Vulgarity can be good natured. Consider AF. Usually vulgar, but rarely if ever uncivil.


He is a good barbarian. I like him.


I agree. He's opposite of me on the political spectrum, but he is by far the funniest poster on Patrick.net.

I see quite a few have him(her?) on ignore, and I think they are missing out.
67   mell   2017 Nov 12, 7:03pm  

Fucking White Male says
Strategist says
Patrick says

Not necessarily. Vulgarity can be good natured. Consider AF. Usually vulgar, but rarely if ever uncivil.


He is a good barbarian. I like him.


I agree. He's opposite of me on the political spectrum, but he is by far the funniest poster on Patrick.net.

I see quite a few have him(her?) on ignore, and I think they are missing out.


Agreed.

« First        Comments 53 - 67 of 67        Search these comments

Please register to comment:

api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   random   suggestions