by lostand confused ➕follow (3) 💰tip ignore
« First « Previous Comments 41 - 57 of 57 Search these comments
Sniper says
Please list what those 4 indictments are and how they are directly related to Trump's 2016 campaign.
If it's a broken record, then I'm sure you already know. One typically doesn't lie to an investigator unless he/she has something to hide...
... fucking Trump is proven to be insulting your intelligence 5 or 6 times a day by lying to your face AND STILL YOU TALK ABOUTjazz_music says
Hillary Hillary Hillary, Obama, Obama, Obama,
... fucking Trump is proven to be insulting your intelligence 5 or 6 times a day by lying to your face AND STILL YOU TALK ABOUT
Hillary Hillary Hillary, Obama, Obama, Obama,
WHAT A BUNCH OF PUSSIES!!!!!
Consider George Papadopoulos. The special counsel secured his guilty plea not for improper contact with the Russians but for lying about that contact to the FBI. Consider Michael Flynn. He too pled guilty not to unlawful contact with Russians but to lying to the FBI about that contact. ”
Is there any way to have a conversation about Trump without mentioning Hillary? Just wondering.
No, because in our election system, it was basically Hillary the Wonderful Progressive Totally Not A Hint of Corruption vs. Trump. There were two choices, and contrasting with the losing candidate who was the only viable alternative is perfectly reasonable.
Can you please explain how you know this inside information from Mueller,. I'm curious where the details of these investigations leaked out. I haven't read the details
Please list what those 4 indictments are and how they are directly related to Trump's 2016 campaign.
Sorry, I don't know how these indictments show Russian collusion, that's why I asked for those details.
Sniper saysCan you please explain how you know this inside information from Mueller,. I'm curious where the details of these investigations leaked out. I haven't read the details
Again-let's not make the post about me.
Sniper saysPlease list what those 4 indictments are and how they are directly related to Trump's 2016 campaign.
No actually you asked:
Sniper says
Sorry, I don't know how these indictments show Russian collusion, that's why I asked for those details.
You're claiming some inside knowledge about details of the investigation, that's why I asked you to clarify them. Who else should I ask? Stop being so sensitive or don't make claims that people ask you to verify
Isn't Mueller's investigation about looking for Russian collusion in the past elections? Didn't Trump run in the elections? Hasn't the overwhelming narrative been Russia helped Trump win.
Why do I always need to connect these dots?
The indictment is public.
Hint: it had NOTHING to do with Russian interference with the election, and was for events YEARS before.
what was Flynn's position with the Trump campaign? What was he indicted for?
why was Flynn's sentencing date pushed back just the other day?
Yep--and those indictments are expected to be amended with additional charges.
There you go.
anon_ce856 saysIs it possible to get links from neutral sources that DON'T have severe TDS?
No because TDS isn't a real thing and there will never be a definition of what it is supposed to be.
No because TDS isn't a real thing and there will never be a definition of what it is supposed to be.
« First « Previous Comments 41 - 57 of 57 Search these comments
patrick.net
An Antidote to Corporate Media
1,194,783 comments by 13,938 users - GeorgePBurdell, jmc1248, mell online now