« First « Previous Comments 84 - 101 of 101 Search these comments
Unfortunately, CA is looking at it as a privacy issue. One can cry and scream all they want but that doesn't change how this will be fought in court.
Biggest load of bullshit, my argument is me and I say 'you' not 'your argument'. The original is down and I deleted my comment so done and done.
whose laws and policies restrict local police and jailers from taking part in federal immigration enforcement.
Logical question is, why Sessions/Trump does not make E-verify mandatory if they are so against illegal immigration? Perhaps what they do is just a smoke screen or illusion of taking action?
Logical question is, why Sessions/Trump does not make E-verify mandatory if they are so against illegal immigration? Perhaps what they do is just a smoke screen or illusion of taking action?
So the possibility remains that the Trump administration is not actually serious about ending illegal immigrantion. Please forward this comment to members of the Trump administration. Hey, you never know, there's a slim chance it will help.
for more remote areas drones in air 24x7 for a fraction of price of a wall would be more efficient. Say, TX Big Bend area or AZ desert
« First « Previous Comments 84 - 101 of 101 Search these comments
https://www.sfgate.com/nation/article/Sessions-to-make-major-sanctuary-jurisdiction-12731976.php