patrick.net
An Antidote to Corporate Media
1,192,973 comments by 13,872 users - komputodo, mell, RC2006 online now
What a real leftoid fascist police state without 1st and 2nd amendment looks like
invite response
2018 May 26, 8:52pm 10,434 views 50 comments
« First « Previous Comments 41 - 50 of 50 Search these comments
41
MisdemeanorRebel
2018 May 28, 1:37pm
MisdemeanorRebel
2018 May 28, 1:37pm
Aphroman says
The media has always been great and still is. Eat your yellowcake
Trump is good i like him and it feels that he likes me
The media has always been great and still is. Eat your yellowcake
42
LeonDurham
2018 May 28, 1:44pm
TwoScoopsOfDragonEnergy says
Absolutely a strawman. You are purposely misstating the viewpoints of others in an attempt to knock down that strawman. It's all Trumpkins have.
#1-- Nobody is saying any criticism of media is extremist. That's a lie.
#2-- Nobody is saying the media is only composed of honest and correct viewpoints. That's a lie.
#3-- Some liberals have bemoaned the growing corporatism and consolidation of media outlets. Like Sinclair forcing news anchors to spout their propaganda on the air:
http://mindy-fischer-writer.com/2018/03/sinclair-forcing-news-anchors-read-propaganda-slamming-one-sided-news-stories/
The problem is with Trump and his minions that lie continuously and try to mislead people to cover their lies. Like this:
http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/389526-audio-revealed-from-source-trump-claimed-doesnt-exist
"An audio recording of a conversation between reporters and a senior White House official released Saturday disproved President Trump's claims that a source quoted by The New York Times "doesn't exist."
Not a strawman.
Haven't lefties been screaming bloody murder for years about consolidation of media and their corporatism, globalist bias? All my life, going back to the 80s.
Now all of a sudden, any criticism of the media is extremist and the media is only composed of honest and correct viewpoints.
Absolutely a strawman. You are purposely misstating the viewpoints of others in an attempt to knock down that strawman. It's all Trumpkins have.
#1-- Nobody is saying any criticism of media is extremist. That's a lie.
#2-- Nobody is saying the media is only composed of honest and correct viewpoints. That's a lie.
#3-- Some liberals have bemoaned the growing corporatism and consolidation of media outlets. Like Sinclair forcing news anchors to spout their propaganda on the air:
http://mindy-fischer-writer.com/2018/03/sinclair-forcing-news-anchors-read-propaganda-slamming-one-sided-news-stories/
The problem is with Trump and his minions that lie continuously and try to mislead people to cover their lies. Like this:
http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/389526-audio-revealed-from-source-trump-claimed-doesnt-exist
"An audio recording of a conversation between reporters and a senior White House official released Saturday disproved President Trump's claims that a source quoted by The New York Times "doesn't exist."
43
bob2356
2018 May 28, 1:45pm
Quigley says
So what are the constitutional protections that exist to protect a person willfully committing contempt of court? Last time I read the constitution that wasn't mentioned. Did I miss it somehow?
Quigley says
ROFLOL. Better check my old posts. I'm a staunch believer in constitutional rights. I'm also a staunch believer in obeying the law and not trying to dummy up some phony "rights" to make non existent fake hysteria.
Of course he has the ability to defy the first amendment. He sighs bills. Congress has been chipping away at rights for a long time. The conservative wing of the supreme court has been going along just fine and there have bee some really head scratching anti rights rulings the last 20 years. If you think you have the same rights you did 30 years ago then you have been a good kool aide drinker.
The rest of us freedom lovers are just pointing to this example and saying, “See? This is what can happen when there are no constitutional protections of speech and press! This is the tyranny that results! We must never abandon our rights in favor of some promised “security” just as Ben Franklin said!
Never! Give up! Rights!
So what are the constitutional protections that exist to protect a person willfully committing contempt of court? Last time I read the constitution that wasn't mentioned. Did I miss it somehow?
Quigley says
And no, Trump does not define my beliefs any more than Josef Stalin defines yours! We may have many points of agreement, just as you may agree with Stalin’s methods and madness, but I also disagree with much of what Trump says and does. His calls for restriction of the press seem whiny at best, and woefully ignorant of the situation at worst. He has no ability to defy the First Ammendment. There is no danger of that, and there never was.
ROFLOL. Better check my old posts. I'm a staunch believer in constitutional rights. I'm also a staunch believer in obeying the law and not trying to dummy up some phony "rights" to make non existent fake hysteria.
Of course he has the ability to defy the first amendment. He sighs bills. Congress has been chipping away at rights for a long time. The conservative wing of the supreme court has been going along just fine and there have bee some really head scratching anti rights rulings the last 20 years. If you think you have the same rights you did 30 years ago then you have been a good kool aide drinker.
44
LeonDurham
2018 May 28, 1:45pm
TwoScoopsOfDragonEnergy says
And more strawman arguments. See-liberals criticize media when they deserve criticism, and defend media when they deserve defending.
The media has always been great and all is. Eat your yellowcake
And more strawman arguments. See-liberals criticize media when they deserve criticism, and defend media when they deserve defending.
45
bob2356
2018 May 28, 1:47pm
TwoScoopsOfDragonEnergy says
If you can't make a point then throw out nonsense.
The media has always been great and all is. Eat your yellowcake
If you can't make a point then throw out nonsense.
46
MisdemeanorRebel
2018 May 28, 1:50pm
MisdemeanorRebel
2018 May 28, 1:50pm
My remarks are absolutely relevant.
Just today no less than 3 verified twitter blue checks tweeted a picture from 2014 and blamed Trump before their hasty deletion.
We still don't have an answer about how 3 outlets published fake dates to a Wikileaks email last December on the same day
Maybe the establishment media shouldn't rush before checking things out.
Their bias says it's true so they don't bother.
More evidence for my theory.
Just today no less than 3 verified twitter blue checks tweeted a picture from 2014 and blamed Trump before their hasty deletion.
We still don't have an answer about how 3 outlets published fake dates to a Wikileaks email last December on the same day
Maybe the establishment media shouldn't rush before checking things out.
Their bias says it's true so they don't bother.
More evidence for my theory.
47
MisdemeanorRebel
2018 May 28, 1:51pm
MisdemeanorRebel
2018 May 28, 1:51pm
bob2356 says
Delicious yellowcake
At Jason Blairs cafe
Just across from the frat house where Jackie was raped
WhIle studying the national guard memos written in MS Word in the 1970s
TwoScoopsOfDragonEnergy saysThe media has always been great and all is. Eat your yellowcake
If you can't make a point then throw out nonsense.
Delicious yellowcake
At Jason Blairs cafe
Just across from the frat house where Jackie was raped
WhIle studying the national guard memos written in MS Word in the 1970s
48
FortWayne
2018 May 28, 1:53pm
FortWayne
2018 May 28, 1:53pm
Freedom is America’s invention. Liberals just don’t appreciate opportunities it provides. They don’t understand what second amendment defends against. Too sheltered and dumb.
Smart people use freedom to open business, stupid once use it to promote sjw stupidity.
Smart people use freedom to open business, stupid once use it to promote sjw stupidity.
49
LeonDurham
2018 May 28, 2:00pm
TwoScoopsOfDragonEnergy says
The funny thing is that this is an example of the good of media. There were many outlets that doubted the yellowcake story and printed such.
Delicious yellowcake
The funny thing is that this is an example of the good of media. There were many outlets that doubted the yellowcake story and printed such.
50
Patrick
2024 Apr 23, 3:36pm
Patrick
2024 Apr 23, 3:36pm
https://www.europereloaded.com/met-police-officer-admits-protest-ban-against-tommy-robinson-may-have-been-unlawful/
Met Police Officer Admits Protest Ban Against Tommy Robinson May Have Been Unlawful
« First « Previous Comments 41 - 50 of 50 Search these comments
The UK is long gone (RIP). God bless the US - go Trump and MAGA!
"
UK activist and English Defence Leage founder Tommy Robinson was arrested on Friday outside of Leeds Crown Court for reporting on a pedophile grooming trial. Within six hours of his arrest, Robinson was handed a 13 month prison term for violating a prior suspended sentence for a similar offense, while media outlets were banned from covering the incident by the court - with several removing reports which had already been published.
Footage shows Robinson, 35, being arrested while livestreaming to his Facebook page outside the courthouse. He can be heard shouting to a friend "Please, George, get me a solicitor, I’m on a suspended sentence, you see."
Caolan Robertson
✔
@CaolanRob
Tommy Robinson has been arrested in Leeds court for reporting on grooming gangs. More updates to follow
1:53 AM - May 25, 2018
11.6K
12K people are talking about this
Twitter Ads info and privacy
“A big police van with about seven police officers pulled up and arrested [Robinson] and told him to stop live streaming,” Robinson’s producer told RT (before their article (archived) was scrubbed from the internet). “They said it was incitement and a breach of the peace.
“No peace has been breached – there were two other people there and he’s been perfectly quiet talking into his phone. [The police] said nothing about the court proceedings. It’s very strange.”
Disturbingly, the judge who sentenced Robinson, Geoffrey Marson QC, ordered an Orwellian media blackout - which resulted in several publications deleting their articles from the web covering Robinson's arrest.
Mike Cernovich ??
✔
@Cernovich
The most terrifying video you’ll see today. https://www.pscp.tv/w/bdhDrzE0MDc0NTN8MUJSSmpyUE5NdlpKd0KUYZEbjMyFwspypS-CTjorp7W8vP0wXoGrBL3VqQwy …
10:47 AM - May 25, 2018
Mike Cernovich @Cernovich
The most terrifying video you’ll see today.
pscp.tv
3,355
3,032 people are talking about this
Twitter Ads info and privacy
George Llewelyn-John
@georgellewelyn
17h
Replying to @georgellewelyn
It has been made clear to us if we put any more information out than we have that we ourselves face a very real risk of arrest. So thank you to everyone standing up for the truth and for freedom of the press at this moment. Thank you, thank you.
Carp hey denim
@Carpheydenim
I won't stop. Here's the gag order & here's the judge smiling as Tommy is about toget arrested with one of the officers involved #freeTommy pic.twitter.com/iKjtT6Amwe
3:53 AM - May 26, 2018
View image on TwitterView image on Twitter
213
187 people are talking about this
Twitter Ads info and privacy
WikiLeaks
✔
@wikileaks
Media delete articles on Tommy Robinson arrest in the UK after judge orders reporting ban. https://twitter.com/nickmon1112/status/1000062767687241729 …
9:11 AM - May 26, 2018
3,743
3,446 people are talking about this
Twitter Ads info and privacy
Robinson was admonished last year by Judge Heather Norton for filming outside a gang rape case in Canterbury, who slapped him with a three month suspended sentence on the condition that he cease his coverage of the trials.
you should be under no illusions that if you commit any further offence of any kind, and that would include, I would have thought a further contempt of court by similar actions, then that sentence of three months would be activated -Judge Heather Norton
“This is not about free speech, not about the freedom of the press, nor about legitimate journalism, and not about political correctness,” the judge told Robinson at the time.
#FreeTommy
In response to Robinson's arrest, a large group of protesters gathered outside Downing Street - while the hashtag #FreeTommy has been used to coordinate a response, express outrage and share information about the situation.
Nick Monroe
@nickmon1112
15h
Replying to @nickmon1112
I have been handed this update on the Tommy Robinson situation. It includes a point of contact if you wish to send your support. pic.twitter.com/2mbVy6IjMt
Nick Monroe
@nickmon1112
A crowd of #FreeTommy protesters have gathered in support of Tommy Robinson.
This video comes via @VervimaMedia pic.twitter.com/P7a6fmBRTd
8:07 AM - May 26, 2018
786
530 people are talking about this
Twitter Ads info and privacy
Vervima Media
@VervimaMedia
Live at #FreeTommy
7:36 AM - May 26, 2018
1,122
898 people are talking about this
Twitter Ads info and privacy
Robinson's arrest has also sparked a free speech debate over social media, with supporters and detractors alike standing up for the controversial activist's right (or lack thereof) to express his opinion.
Lauren Southern
✔
@Lauren_Southern
Tommy Robinson has just been sentenced to jail for 13 months. There is a UK reporting ban. No one there is allowed to talk about it. #FreeTommy
7:51 AM - May 25, 2018
18.2K
13.2K people are talking about this
Twitter Ads info and privacy
Kelham Hurst
@KelhamHurst
I don’t agree with everything he says, but being arrested for filming a news story outside a courthouse, and imprisoned within 6 hours sounds dystopian #FreeTommy
8:14 AM - May 25, 2018
623
250 people are talking about this
Twitter Ads info and privacy
Stefan Molyneux
✔
@StefanMolyneux
Tommy Robinson was [REDACTED] for reporting on [REDACTED] and [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] months in [REDACTED]. Reporting on [REDACTED] in the United Kingdom is illegal until [REDACTED].
8:25 PM - May 25, 2018
6,067
2,641 people are talking about this
Twitter Ads info and privacy
Trending Articles
Jim Jatras: Forget Kim. It's Time For A Trump-Putin…
In the aftermath of US President Donald Trump’s cancellation of his scheduled June 12 summit with North Korea’s Kim…
Powered By
View image on Twitter
View image on Twitter
Peter Allen
@SgtPeterAllen
Today Judge Geoffrey Marson QC sentenced a man who may not be named to death in a secret trial that may not be reported on for an offence that may not be mentioned although it is suspected to be for exposing the extent of child abuse and grooming gangs in Britain. #tommyrobinson
9:42 AM - May 25, 2018
2,778
2,924 people are talking about this
Twitter Ads info and privacy
Pedophile grooming gangs
A group of 29 defendants are being tried for historical sex offences against children, split into three trials. Robinson was arrested at the second trial, while the first is ongoing.
For more on the grooming gangs which have abused over 700 women and girls, click here.
Meanwhile, enraged Britons have been harassing the defendants as they make their way to court in the ongoing trials.
Here is the full list of defendants via The Sun.
First Trial
Amere Singh Dhaliwal, 34, from Huddersfield, West Yorks., is accused of 54 charges, including 21 charges of rape and 14 charges of trafficking with a view of sexual exploitation. Dhaliwal is accused of charges against eleven different girls from 2004 to 2011.
Irfan Ahmed, 32, from Huddersfield, West Yorks., was charged with nine offences including making an indecent image of a child.
Zahid Hassan, 28, from Huddersfield, West Yorks., was charged with 20 offences including six charges of raping a girl aged 13 or under.
Mohammed Kammer, 32, from Huddersfield, West Yorks., was charged with two offences including rape of a girl under 15.
Mohammed Aslam, 29, from Huddersfield, West Yorks., was charged with two offences including rape of a girl under 15.
Abdul Rehman, 30, from Sheffield, South Yorks., was charged with seven offences including raping a girl under 15.
Raj Singh Barsran, 32, from Huddersfield, West Yorks., was charged with three offences including sexual touching of a girl over 13.
Nahman Mohammed, 31 from Huddersfield, West Yorks., was charged with three counts including trafficking a person for sexual exploitation.
Zubair Ahmed, 30, from Huddersfield, West Yorks., was charged with two offences including raping a girl under the age 15.
Hamzha Saleem, 37, from Old traddford, Gtr Mancs., was charged with three counts including human trafficking.
Second Trial (Robinson's arrest)
Mansoor Akhtar, 25, from Huddersfield, West Yorks., was charged with three offences including attempted rape of a girl under the age of 13.
Mohammed Asaf Akram, 31, from Huddersfield, West Yorks., was charged with 14 offences including four charges of raping a girl of thirteen or under and one charge of threatening to kill.
Wiqas Mahmud, 36 from Huddersfield, West Yorks.., was charged with three offences of rape of a girl under 15.
Nasarat Hussain, 28, from Huddersfield, West Yorks., was charged with five offences including rape of a girl under 15.
Sajid Hussain, 32, from Huddersfield, West Yorks., was charged with five offences including rape of a girl under 15.
Mohammed Irfraz, 28, from Huddersfield, West Yorks.., was charged with eight offences including false imprisonment.
Faisal Nadeem, 30 from Huddersfield, West Yorks., was charged with three counts including raping a woman 16 or over.
Mohammed Azeem, 31, from Bradford, West Yorks., was charged with three offences including rape of a girl under 15.
Zulquarnian Dogar, 29, from Huddersfield, West Yorks., was charged with two offences including sexual touching of a female aged 13 or over.
Manzoor Hassan, 37, from Huddersfield, West Yorks., was charged with four offences including inciting the sexual exploitation of a child aged between 13-17.
Third trial set to last for six weeks.
Niaz Ahmed, 53, from Huddersfield, West Yorks., was charged with three offences including sexual assault on a female.
Mohammed Imran Ibrar, 32, from Huddersfield, West Yorks., was charged with four offences including arranging the commission of a child sex offence.
Asif Bashir, 32, from Huddersfield, West Yorks., was charged with five offences, including three counts of raping a woman 16 or over.
Everton la Bastide, 50, from Huddersfield, West Yorks., was charged with two offences including sexual touching a girl of 13 or over.
Saqib Raheel, 30, from Dudley was charged with two offences including trafficking for sexual exploitation.
Usman Khalid, 29, from Huddersfield, West Yorks., was charged with three offences including assaulting a girl under 13.
Aleem Javaid, 27, from Huddersfield, West Yorks., was charged with two offences including supply of a class B drug.
Mrs Naveeda Habib, 38, from Huddersfield, West Yorks., was charged on one count of neglect of a child.
Mrs Shahnaz Malik, 55 from Huddersfield, West Yorks., was charged with one count of neglecting a child.
"