patrick.net

bob2356 says

What basic constitutional protection is that? Oh right the one the supreme court says doesn't exist.

You guys are really struggling with the double jeopardy and sovereignty concept. A little study would be in order that this point to have an informed discussion.

Then why is the fat assed NY AG / Democrat Muppet trying to circumvent this supposed non-existent constitutional protection?

Oh my... was doing research on this issue and found something archived that could be a major network story. Anyone have an idea on where I could sell it? Daddy needs cash!

Quigley says

Which state law of NY did D’Souza break?

NY has a law preventing anybody convicted of a crime (anywhere, period) from being prosecuted twice.

Then there's ex post facto as well.

bob2356 says

I don't need wiki for basic civics and government. I learned those things 40 years ago. Stuff every citizen should know. The double jeopardy loophole is in NY state law, not federal law or the constitution. She can only go after him once under NY sovereignty if the law is changed to allow it. Since you still don't know this I'm thinking you still didn't do your homework and read up on how double jeopard actually works. No gold star on the forehead for you.

Heath v. Alabama was in 1985, and was a narrow 5-4 ruling, so how did you learn about it 40 years ago?

Another horrible Sandra Day O'Connor ruling.

But then again Bob, Libbies think California has any authority over National Immigration, and can compel non-cooperation with the Federal Government to boot.