« First « Previous Comments 15 - 54 of 54 Search these comments
It is rather silly
King tide" is a colloquial term for an especially high spring tide, such as a perigean spring tide. "King tide" is not a scientific term, nor is it used in a scientific context. Wikipedia
Dropping scientiic sounding words like gravitational pull is creative. When did earth's gravity changed recently. Nothing to see here...move along.
One can literally spend 15 minutes and goog ll e widespread evidence of sea level rising, and many other man created climate change
The question is so stupid, only to reveal yourself as a medieval zealot unschooled in the scientific process. I don't waste time to unlock closed minds.
Onvacation saysSo when is Manhattan flooding?
Deniers wanna know.
Anyone?
One can literally spend 15 minutes and goog ll e widespread evidence of sea level rising,
Parting words. Let's consider risk.
Risk = severity of consequences x likelihood (probability)
1. If environmental stewards are wrong, we will end up with this:
Generating energy that produces no greenhouse gas emissions from fossil fuels and reduces some types of air pollution. Diversifying energy supply and reducing dependence on imported fuels. Creating economic development and jobs in manufacturing, installation, and more.
2. If deniers are wrong, future generations are royally screwed.
As our world becomes warmer and warmer, our seas will continue to rise.
Global average sea level rose by around 0.17 m (1.7 mm/year) during the 20th century.
Back it up. When you state an opinion, like "the rise of sea level is not alarming", back it with sources.
Are you are climate scientist,
I am sure Miami being liberal controlled, j
kt1652 saysAre you are climate scientist,
Are you are?
I have been studying climate science since the last coming ice age.
Come back and debate me some more. You might learn something.
The oceans used to alp the foothills of the Sierra mountians and receded long before men walked the earth-LOLZ Liberals, liberlas!
The oceans aren't rising
Catastrophically.
The temperature isn't rising
Catastrophically.
The ice isn't melting
Catastrophically.
What is a catastrophe is what has happened to science.
That is why I have decided it is waste of time to debate, you can have the last word.
Cite some references.
Global average sea level rose by around 0.17 m (1.7 mm/year) during the 20th century. In Europe rates of sea-level rise (SLR) ranged from - 0.3 mm/year to 2.8 mm/year. Recent results from satellites and tide gauges indicate a higher average rate of global SLR in the past 15 years of about 3.1 mm/year.
"Thei study attributed the flooding frequency increase to a decadal-scle accelerating rates of SLR. (Sea Level Rise). "
LoL
The earth survives whether man die from starvation, heat or nuke fallout.
Rate of change: (Y1-Y2)/(X1-X2) = m (slope)
Denominator of of 20,000years would be of no concern to anyone.
NOAA "fiddle[d]" with data when the agency published a report concluding that there was no global warming hiatus.[
« First « Previous Comments 15 - 54 of 54 Search these comments
https://climatism.blog/2019/02/22/japan-acknowledges-the-global-warming-pause-sanctions-35-new-coal-power-plants-added-to-the-100-currently-operational/