patrick.net

For service members whose careers survived the now-rescinded COVID-19 military “vaccine” mandate, many are becoming increasingly concerned about all vaccines, which include the flu vaccine.

Objections, including those based on religious grounds, about the safety, efficacy, testing, and research of the injections they once agreed to receive are on the rise.

Federal Court Strikes Down Colorado University’s ‘Unconstitutional’ COVID Vaccine Mandate

A federal court this month struck down the University of Colorado Anschutz School of Medicine’s COVID-19 vaccine mandate as unconstitutional. The ruling could affect similar cases, including a Children’s Health Defense lawsuit against Rutgers University over its vaccine mandate. ...

In a 55-page ruling issued May 7, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit found that Anschutz’s vaccine mandate demonstrated “religious animus” — in violation of the First Amendment’s Establishment and Free Exercise clauses.

Anschutz enacted the mandate on Sept. 1, 2021, and amended it later that month. The 10th Circuit ruled that both versions were unconstitutional.

The mandate recognized religious exceptions but required applicants to overcome a series of hurdles, which the plaintiffs argued were unevenly applied.

In September 2021, the Thomas More Society sued Anschutz on behalf of 17 students and employees whose requests for religious exemptions were denied and who faced personal, academic and professional repercussions as a result. They argued the exemption policy was discriminatory.

Children’s Health Defense late Wednesday asked the U.S. Supreme Court to hear its case against Rutgers University challenging the university’s COVID-19 vaccine mandate.

Can you believe that in 2024 hospitals are still stopping people getting transplants due to their vaccination status?

In the latest example, it appears that the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota, turned down an individual because “at this current time, you indicated that you have not received a COVID-19 vaccination”.

Whilst I cannot verify that the letter is real, all of the information in the letter appears to be accurate.

Furthermore, the reason for the lung transplant being turned down is “based on guidance from the American Society of Transplantation and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention”.

However, looking at all the advice I can see from both those organisations and the NIH, COVID-19 vaccination is only every recommended. So, according to this letter, the Mayo clinic have taken the recommendation and used wording to make it look as if they have been forced to reject the transplant patient. In reality, they have based their policy on a recommendation whilst implying that it is a necessity.

Covid hysteria still isn’t over.