0
0

The metaphysical housing market


 invite response                
2006 Aug 22, 4:12pm   20,425 views  125 comments

by Peter P   ➕follow (2)   💰tip   ignore  

How much of the recent gains will become permanent and material?

What is real?

#housing

« First        Comments 87 - 125 of 125        Search these comments

87   DinOR   2006 Aug 23, 7:55am  

Uh, o.k so no one seems like they're in a real charitable mood right now AND I'M O.K WITH THAT!

If we'd rather scratch out a check for the FULL amount to the gub'ment please be my guest.

True, this is the quickest and easiest way out of ANY situation. Just CTC (cut the check). Lawsuit? CTC! Divorce? CTC! Dispute w/employee/employer? CTC! Short sale on overpriced sh@tbox? CTC! See? It all goes away. I know it's what most CPA's would say. This is why CPA's suck. Sorry.

88   Glen   2006 Aug 23, 7:57am  

This author of the article linked below has a disturbing take on household solvency (or lack thereof). The author notes that 20 million homeowner households have $0 or negative net worth. Also interesting to learn that there are 74 million households above the poverty level--and 69 million homeowner households (most of these are probably people who are barely above the poverty level--the rest are presumably perma-renters or bubble-sitters).

When the crash hits, who will win? The 20M FBs or the 5M solvent renters?

http://www.oftwominds.com/blogmay06/wealth-effect.html

89   Peter P   2006 Aug 23, 8:19am  

Put my son’s money in a 5.85 CD today at Wamu.(The money he saved for a car ..10K)He’ll get it out when he’s 15 and 1/2…just in time to start dreaming about a car…which make…color…life is good.

Make sure it is a safe car (5-star rating frontal and side) though.

90   Peter P   2006 Aug 23, 8:21am  

When the crash hits, who will win? The 20M FBs or the 5M solvent renters?

20M FBs? It is 20 vs. 5 or 4 to 1!

91   speedingpullet   2006 Aug 23, 8:25am  

alien Says:

A note on renting - I just moved in to a 1/3 of a $1.5M house in Topanga,

I'm looking to buy in Topanga, once the prices come down. Nice little house, bit of land....

Already seeing some reductions - a 1.2 million place got a 25% "haircut" this morning to 900K.

So, what's Topanga like? The good? the bad? The ugly?

92   Peter P   2006 Aug 23, 8:38am  

From Ben's blog:

Better to live next to a salvage yard than in a staged house during a slow real-estate market.

93   Peter P   2006 Aug 23, 8:48am  

I know quite a few people who still expect high single digit appreciation as a sustainable norm.

So you are implying that people you know are not out and out clueless?

94   HARM   2006 Aug 23, 8:55am  

Pretty much everyone except for the out and out clueless has now heard that the ride is over.

Unfortunately, the "out and out clueless" group constitutes approx. 99% of the U.S. population.

95   Randy H   2006 Aug 23, 8:59am  

I posted an article about the economics of what DinOR and I were discussing earlier on my blog: Housing Bubble Economics.

96   DinOR   2006 Aug 23, 9:00am  

TN,

I'm pretty sure. The only bulls left are finding themselves like the guys that show up at a party with a keg over their shoulder only to find, it's not "that kind" of a party.

Cherry picking is one thing, ignoring overwhelming data is another.

97   Randy H   2006 Aug 23, 9:03am  

FRIFY,

All you’re saying is that the supply curve rises late and steeply

I'm saying something a bit different. I'm saying there is a distinct discontinuity in the supply curve on the way down, just as there was in the demand curve on the way up. This discontinuity grows the most right before a shift in sentiment. A sloped or curved continuity would imply that the "in between price" was attainable. I contend it is not (in most cases), until the entire vertical is flushed from the system.

98   Peter P   2006 Aug 23, 9:16am  

I’m saying there is a distinct discontinuity in the supply curve on the way down, just as there was in the demand curve on the way up.

I do not believe there are "discontinuities". I tend to think that the supply and demands curves themselves are heavily dependent on price expectations.

99   Randy H   2006 Aug 23, 9:20am  

newsfreak,

I'm not saying it's an anomaly. I'm saying it is an erratic price, not likely to be reproduced with regularity. There is not enough supply at that level to support the assertion that 540K is the new equilibrium price, as a marginal price analysis would assert.

In technical terms, this is a price either on or below a discontinuity in the supply curve.

100   Peter P   2006 Aug 23, 9:23am  

Moreover, price expectations themselves are based on price actions. As a result, any analysis of supply and demand would be completely useless.

However, although sellers may not accept the reality of lower comps, each anecdote of price reduction will only add to their fear.

Everybody breaks after a certain point.

101   Randy H   2006 Aug 23, 9:24am  

I do not believe there are “discontinuities”. I tend to think that the supply and demands curves themselves are heavily dependent on price expectations.

Imagine there are only two sellers in an unique neighborhood. Say one is you and the other is me. You want to sell your condo $hitbox for 1.1mil, and won't take a penny under 1.0mil because you think you'll just rent it out otherwise.

I, on the other hand have to get the hell out, and will take whatever the market will bear. I therefore will consider an offer of $450K.

This is a discontinuity, by definition.

In fact, granularly, all housing is a series of discontinuities because each individual seller is a step function to the next. It is only in aggregate that we can integrate and assume continuity; but it is in reality an abstraction.

102   Randy H   2006 Aug 23, 9:27am  

any analysis of supply and demand would be completely useless.

It is far from useless.

Everybody breaks after a certain point.

No, some people leave the market; just like we did on the way up. You're implying that everyone would sell for a penny if pushed far enough. That itself ignores behavioral factors.

103   Peter P   2006 Aug 23, 9:28am  

In fact, granularly, all housing is a series of discontinuities because each individual seller is a step function to the next. It is only in aggregate that we can integrate and assume continuity; but it is in reality an abstraction.

I agree. However, if one is willing to look at a wide variety of housing units, the curve will appear to be less discontinuous.

104   Peter P   2006 Aug 23, 9:33am  

You’re implying that everyone would sell for a penny if pushed far enough. That itself ignores behavioral factors.

They will. I did not say how far though. :)

No, some people leave the market; just like we did on the way up.

We all have breaking points.

105   speedingpullet   2006 Aug 23, 9:35am  

Wha!

Wolf Blizter on CNN is going to have a story on the HB sometime this hour.

106   Peter P   2006 Aug 23, 9:37am  

It is far from useless.

It is not only useless, it is counter-productive. Why was demand booming when prices were skyrocketing? Why is demand plummeting when prices begin to drift downwards?

107   Peter P   2006 Aug 23, 9:42am  

Again, one should not trust me on economics. Randy is the expert.

108   astrid   2006 Aug 23, 9:51am  

"It is not only useless, it is counter-productive. Why was demand booming when prices were skyrocketing? Why is demand plummeting when prices begin to drift downwards?"

We've either found the elusive Giffen Good or its another case of people with unrealistic expectations about future price growth.

Most likely the latter. We also see similar behavior amongst people during periods of hyper-inflation.

109   astrid   2006 Aug 23, 9:57am  

Randy,

If push comes to shove, people will abandon property they own, if the net present value of the property is at zero or negative. This will happen if the cost of maintenance is greater than the value derived from the property. We see it all the time with old computers and abandoned mines all the time. We may soon see it amongst condos with high HOA fees and high desert houses with 3 hour commutes and $600 cooling bills.

110   Peter P   2006 Aug 23, 9:59am  

Well that characterization is rather subjective but what I meant to say is that particular mentality isn’t as scarce as you might think.

That mentality is WIDEspread. Actually, I want to become clueless as well. It should give me better sleep at night.

111   astrid   2006 Aug 23, 10:03am  

In the case of that 50% off house, the seller must have had totally unrealistic original expectations about the value of the property. NoVA houses have not dropped anywhere near 50%. I'm seeing 5 to 10% reductions on SFHs and THs, maybe up to 20% on condos, but the asking prices are still pretty high and decently priced houses (around April-May 2005 levels) are still moving okay.

112   astrid   2006 Aug 23, 10:12am  

pbass,

Hehe. First they get designated as money laundering operations for the North Koreans and now this. Not to mention all the under-secured debts to SOEs that they're never getting back. I almost feel sorry for these bloated (cuz half their job is getting boozed and dinned by borrowers) Chinese bankers.

113   FormerAptBroker   2006 Aug 23, 10:52am  

astrid Says:

> I predict 2008 to 2012 will be good years to buy exotic
> vacations and slightly used European handbags/cars
> with cash.

I wonder if any of the Junior League SF gals that bought $9K Hermes Birkin Bags (many JLSF gals have more than one) with cash from HELOCs will try and sell to save their homes from foreclosure?

http://tinyurl.com/f2qx8

114   Randy H   2006 Aug 23, 11:02am  

Again, one should not trust me on economics. Randy is the expert.

**Disclaimer: Randy is not an expert, just well researched and opinionated. Always consult a licensed expert before you make a financial decision.

115   astrid   2006 Aug 23, 11:05am  

"**Disclaimer: Randy is not an expert, just well researched and opinionated. Always consult a licensed expert before you make a financial decision."

Egad! Licensed economists? Next thing I know, we're going to have a philosophers' strike on our hands.

116   astrid   2006 Aug 23, 11:16am  

In the spirit of really OTness, I bring you a link to eBay's guide to buying Hermes bags.

http://tinyurl.com/enleb

I like Hermes perfumes. But paying more than $1,000 for a bag seems pretty insane. I guess the secret is to get a sugardaddy to buy that stuff for you a la Carrie Bradshaw.

117   astrid   2006 Aug 23, 11:27am  

Not that I'd pay more than $250 for a bag. For my purposes, a man-purse is much more practical.

http://www.fatiguesarmynavy.com/store/item/FA1955

Apologies to all for going really really OT.

118   Paul189   2006 Aug 23, 12:14pm  

My crystal ball says property taxes will no longer be deductable off your federal income tax. They will be tax credits! You will get dollar for dollar off your federal tax bill for property taxes paid. This will effectively transfer the cost of local government to the federal budget which is perfect since they have the printing press. The result will be a reduction in the cost of owning; thereby putting a floor under housing prices.

119   DinOR   2006 Aug 23, 1:05pm  

"They will be tax credits!"

I sure hope you're kidding. This is ALL we need right now. Plunge Protection Team Damage Control to the rescue!

If anything the pendelum is swinging the other way. You mean to tell me we don't subsidize home ownership enough already? If this is what we're counting on to prop up the RE market we're all screwed.

120   DinOR   2006 Aug 23, 1:08pm  

Conor,

Please count yourself (along with the only guy studying for CFA) among this "esteemed" crowd! I actually value ALL of the posters here opinions. Or I wouldn't be here.

When you work at home this is the closest thing you have to a "water cooler".

121   Peter P   2006 Aug 23, 1:22pm  

along with the only guy studying for CFA

Who is that?

122   Michael Holliday   2006 Aug 23, 1:24pm  

speedingpullet Says:

"Wolf Blizter on CNN is going to have a story on the HB sometime this hour."
____

Ahh, sorry to burst YOUR bubble; however, his name is Wolf Cheese-Blintz, not Wolf Blitzer. That's Wolf CHEESE BLINTZ!

Thank you kind sir!

123   DinOR   2006 Aug 23, 2:15pm  

Peter P,

Giving the books a rest are we?

124   Randy H   2006 Aug 23, 2:27pm  

New Thread: Collateral Damage

125   Peter P   2006 Aug 23, 6:28pm  

you never know when a driver or crazed motorcyclist might come round a blind bend on your side of the road

OMG 8-O

This is why I will avoid undivided highways if at all possible.

« First        Comments 87 - 125 of 125        Search these comments

Please register to comment:

api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   random   suggestions