0
0

^


 invite response                
2010 Sep 6, 5:10am   18,774 views  70 comments

by 0   ➕follow (0)   💰tip   ignore  

-

« First        Comments 64 - 70 of 70        Search these comments

64   PolishKnight   2010 Sep 14, 11:43pm  

"the CRA thing has been very thoroughly discredited many times over by many people with impeccable credentials"

I feel like I've stepped into the twilight zone. Patrick.net has tons of links and comments about how Freddie and Fannie helped cause the bubble in the first place due to the CRA and also the subsequent crash and how government is CONTINUING to prop up bad debt. You know, the one where Democrats control both houses and the presidency?

Yeah, sure. Keep on believing that. "The power of leftism (and the Koran) compels you! The power of leftism (and the Koran) compels you!" :-)

65   PolishKnight   2010 Sep 14, 11:49pm  

I hear that the climate is changing. It's changed in the last month and it's causing the leaves to change color. They may even fall in the next month...

66   Philistine   2010 Sep 15, 12:32am  

I could be way off, but aren't sales down YoY, MoM, and foreclosures and supply way up? Generally speaking, of course. I know SF and NYC are Different and Special. I've read too many articles and glossed too many charts, so maybe my hold on the facts is shakey here.

CNBC (for whatever they are worth) is right now on my boob tube telling me that the volume of housing sales were most definitely in a decline YoY.

Rents are more directly tied to wages. That's a fundamental. With unemployment at 12%, plus another 10-15% of UNDERemployment, I'm not convinced. However, given that a former homeowner was paying easily 50% more per month in a Big Fancy City than a renter would have paid for a similarly-appraised property, perhaps that 50% margin between renters and former homeowners is pulling rentals up in these Big Fancy Cities. It's the great downward squeeze.

67   PolishKnight   2010 Sep 15, 12:38am  

"The CRA has never forced a single institution to make a loan since its inception. Furthermore CRA banks actually wrote fewer toxic loans than non-CRA banks did.
If you were honest, you’d confirm these facts."

Perhaps the source of your frustration is that your claimed facts don't, by themselves, make them facts.

For example, let's define your "facts": How many banks are "CRA"? How many are not? What percentage of bad loans are CRA and not? How many CRA banks exist compared to nonCRA banks? What IS a CRA bank?

Why is it a failure of my "honesty" for you to make unsupported claims? You sure don't seem in a rush to confirm where my "facts" are right.

Amazing.

68   PolishKnight   2010 Sep 15, 1:19am  

"You’re not going to believe a word I say on the subject which is why I want YOU to research it for yourself and discover how silly your beliefs are."

Think through what you just said. Let's pick it apart piece by piece:

You start out by saying I'm not going to believe a word you say. So by definition, arguing with me is pointless according to you (and also a great copout.) Smart people usually end it here.

But then you say that you expect me to go out and prove your argument for you. If only people were that helpful. Yet you just claimed that I'm anything but helpful.

Then you have the nerve to say I'm the one with silly beliefs.

Yeah, good luck with that method of argument.

You then turn around and engage in an argument of equivalence and redirection:

"So I guess my question is why you demand all kinds of evidence from me when you’re totally 100% incapable of providing any evidence for anything you’ve said in this entire thread? "

For starters, that's a loaded question. I disagree with you that I'm "100% incapable of providing any evidence for anything I've said in this entire thread." I just provided URL's. In any case, YOU are the one demanding I do YOUR research for you even as you just said I'm "100%" incapable of doing so.

Again, amazing.

69   tatupu70   2010 Sep 15, 2:22am  

PolishKnight says

For starters, that’s a loaded question. I disagree with you that I’m “100% incapable of providing any evidence for anything I’ve said in this entire thread.” I just provided URL’s

You did?

70   tatupu70   2010 Sep 15, 3:38am  

No offense, but doesn't a case of Obama suing because minorities weren't getting loans prove exactly the opposite of what you are arguing? If the banks were writing these loans, there would be no lawsuits, right?

And your wiki quote says things "could" have happened. We're not interested in what "could" have happened. The bubble is over--what we need to find is what DID happen.

« First        Comments 64 - 70 of 70        Search these comments

Please register to comment:

api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   random   suggestions