patrick.net

Peter P, regarding the blog party, we might be having fish, any chance of having you eat with you hands tied behind your back using only a pair of chop sticks in you mouth?

Huh?

Wow! This thread really got going today after coming to a stall in the middle yesterday. I thought it was done when we were talking about the yen, $, cents, pounds, etc..

I thought it was done when we were talking about the yen, $, cents, pounds, etc..

Please feel free to start new threads whenever the old one is going nowhere.

This blog has lengthy threads on "huh?" and knives. So just about anything is possible

I do want to bring the recent discussions about Pluto and Xena into the mix. Will Pluto's demotion from planet status rescue (or doom) the housing bubble?

I do want to bring the recent discussions about Pluto and Xena into the mix. Will Pluto’s demotion from planet status rescue (or doom) the housing bubble?

Pluto is very important. It gives a lot of insight regarding generational movements. I do not care what astronomers say about it.

Sun and moon can be considered planets of Earth as well. It is a matter of perspective.

Sun and moon can be considered planets of Earth as well. It is a matter of perspective.

I thought they hung that Italian dude, what's his name, Cornholius for suggest just that.

Minimum wage in California got raised. Brace for inflation!

Any form of rent control or condo conversion regulation will only make future bubbles worse. A renter's union is not the answer.

There needs to be a formidable force against NIMBYists and anti-growth activists though. I think national builders can be that force in the future and they ought to be our friends.

Inflation - "Can you imagine, when a six pack of Budweiser costs 1,200 dollars?" - Vince Ricardo a/k/a Peter Falk in the IN-LAWS 1979. "Jees, that would be terrible" - Sheldon S. Kornpett, D.D.S. a/k/a Alan Arkin.

Sun and moon can be considered planets of Earth as well. It is a matter of perspective.

By what definition is the sun a "planet"? At best one might claim the Sun is a sibling of an incomplete binary system with Jupiter; but even that's a stretch.

By what definition is the sun a “planet”?

Sun revolves around Earth in relative terms. Since we are here on Earth, it is not unreasonable to see this as the center of the universe.

"Sun revolves around Earth in relative terms. Since we are here on Earth, it is not unreasonable to see this as the center of the universe."

But so does every other star. What makes the sun a planet and not a star?

Also, anyone here think the Earth is flat and all this talk of roundness is a conspiracy amongst cartographers and airline pilots?

And then there's all this gravity and electromagnetic fields non-sense. All our "electronic" devices are obvious run by magical invisible elves and powered by tiny hamsters on hamster wheels.

Sun revolves around Earth in relative terms. Since we are here on Earth, it is not unreasonable to see this as the center of the universe.

How does that change the gravitational interaction of the system? The fact still exists that the Earth and the 8-11 others, along with a whole lot of debris, are satellites subject to the sun, not vice versa.

And then there’s all this gravity and electromagnetic fields non-sense. All our “electronic” devices are obvious run by magical invisible elves and powered by tiny hamsters on hamster wheels.

I was arguing with my sister-in-law last week at dinner. She insists that humans "already have all diseases", and it is only a depressed constitution that allows them to get the best of you. I asked her if she had Ebola and Bird Flu, to which she just got annoyed at my lack of ability to "understand the obvious".

How does that change the gravitational interaction of the system? The fact still exists that the Earth and the 8-11 others, along with a whole lot of debris, are satellites subject to the sun, not vice versa.

You are thinking too much. :)

Don't you think it is better to see thing as they are presented to us? If Pluto are demoted, I suggest that we demote Uranus and Neptune as well because they are not visible to the naked eye.

Why don't we just go back to the "classic" system of personal and transpersonal planets: Mercury, Venus, Mars, Jupiter, and Saturn.

And then there’s all this gravity and electromagnetic fields non-sense. All our “electronic” devices are obvious run by magical invisible elves and powered by tiny hamsters on hamster wheels.

There are energy fields out there that Science is not capable of explaining. Science and technology are good, practical branches of knowledge. However, we should not be unnecessarily restricted by so-called scientific methods.

I'm not sure we can see the "classic" system anymore, since there's so much light pollution everywhere.

I’m not sure we can see the “classic” system anymore, since there’s so much light pollution everywhere.

True. :(

However, we should not be unnecessarily restricted by so-called scientific methods.

What other methods do you propose and how may I verify their accuracy or falsify their merit?

Don’t you think it is better to see thing as they are presented to us?

People dying of Bubonic Plague stunk, so I guess that filling their pockets with posies was a better approach than modern antibiotics, eh?

how may I verify their accuracy or falsify their merit?

That would be too scientific. :)

People dying of Bubonic Plague stunk, so I guess that filling their pockets with posies was a better approach than modern antibiotics, eh?

Well, at least that would not breed multi-drug resistant Bubonic Plague. ;)

One thing: humanity is doomed to have tragedies. Science will not help that. The universe will see to it that suffering will occur somewhere.

You do know that we do not already have all diseases yet, right? ;)

the planets actually exert a gravitational effect on the sun, in proportion to their mass -- so they are pulling the sun around a little bit... hence the incomplete binary system idea -- altho in arthur c. clarke's 2010, they arced up jupiter to make a second sun for intelligent life to form on its moons...

it's all about size, really -- like the person with the biggest stick wins...

here's something on the magic of dark matter from the paper:

Dark matter proved to be more than a theory

a brief moment of levity, if i may -- ricky gervais from the real UK The Office doing something for microsoft... 2 long videos and some shorter ones...

Ricky Gervais - Microsoft 1 - Google Video

Dark matter proved to be more than a theory

Why is this significant? Does dark matter taste good? :-P

dark matter is very ghostly... it passes thru real matter without affecting it... what's that about? altho it's posited to provide the 'missing gravity' holding galaxies together, so surely it must have an effect on light matter...

"The composition of dark matter is unknown, but may include new elementary particles such as WIMPs and axions, ordinary and heavy neutrinos, dwarf stars and planets collectively called MACHOs, and clouds of nonluminous gas. Current evidence favors models in which the primary component of dark matter is new elementary particles, collectively called nonbaryonic dark matter." :!:

might be hard to work into something edible...

dark matter is very ghostly… it passes thru real matter without affecting it…

So if food is made into dark matter I can keep eating without getting fat?

well, yes, that would be a very low-cal diet, probably worse than the aforementioned pablum tho... and i thought pritikin food tasted watery and bland...

I see that it’s a new paradigm ... This asset bubble is different than all of the others - it will never slow down, or pop. The gains are permanent.

Your crystal ball has bubbles in it. Can I sell you some salt for cleansing?

New thread: The metaphysical housing market