Comments 1 - 40 of 53 Next » Last » Search these comments
Not an expert... but the boobs look a little droopy to me. Too much overhang. Potentially matronly.
It's OK to show boobs here (even nipples).
Like I'd said earlier, I don't want to contribute to PatNet, getting the adult label, which is bad for his business.
I'm sure you can fill in the gaps.
Not an expert... but the boobs look a little droopy to me. Too much overhang. Potentially matronly.
I am an expert and those are nice! That's how real ones are supposed to look.
Not an expert... but the boobs look a little droopy to me. Too much overhang. Potentially matronly.
I could live with it. It is just a sign they are real and not silicone. Don't you want us to like natural women? If that particular one was offering to be a surrogate, I think we might have a deal. Might even do it the natural way.
Like I'd said earlier, I don't want to contribute to PatNet, getting the adult label, which is bad for his business.
boobs are ok with me. i'm not even opposed to pornographic pictures in principle, but haven't really considered all the ramifications.
anyhow, it's not much of a business since it has zero revenue these days. partly by choice.
Photo looks a bit odd. There seems to be undue space between the top of her boobs and her skinny shoulders. Kind of like anorexia meets voluptia. Not to mention her nipples are big, black squares.
I think it's a photoshopped "false flag" nudie composite pic. Where's bgamall4 when you need him?
Size of boobs wouldn't be an issue with a doll, since presumably they would remain perky, bouncy and somewhat upright.
However, you would need a "Tit Fuck Mileage" guarantee from the manufacturer i.e. maybe a thousand tit fucks before noticeable degradation of color, texture, and shape, or crazing/cracking/peeling of the plastic due to sperm inundation and emaciation.
One wonders if you can return them to the manufacturer for tit re-upholstering.
I am an expert and those are nice! That's how real ones are supposed to look.
I would love to develop my expertise further.
Potentially matronly
And some of us don't mind that, especially when the next day we can get something else.
Not an expert... but the boobs look a little droopy to me.
Anymore than a mouthful is a waste.
The face looks like they got her out of trailer park and they made her pretty for the job at hand.
I would be perfectly content with a sex robot which looks like
I prefer the real thing. Hot, wet, horny, moaning, groaning, tasty, slithery, orgasmic, skillful, luscious, grateful, energetic, wild, and desperate.
What did I forget?
I would be perfectly content with a sex robot which looks like
Unfortunately current technology only is this advanced.
www.youtube.com/embed/dD_NdnYrDzY
And CIC says the bot keeps getting stuck in the clamped position.
Looks like you might be able to get a "dental training" version of the bot now.
I encourage women to code.
What trade show was that? It appears I never go to the right ones.
And CIC says the bot keeps getting stuck in the clamped position.
I could imagine Ironman/CIC sounding roughly like that. The voicebot also looks like a Ten Pound Bass, kinda. Sorry guys, I could not resist.
But seriously, that video depicts quite a fun science experiment. Instead of building a numerical/electronic simulation of the physical generation of the human voice, they built a mechanical model. Pretty cool.
boobs are ok with me. i'm not even opposed to pornographic pictures in principle, but haven't really considered all the ramifications
If you're going to do it then we should have a section of the site for it. Like an over-18 section that doesn't get mixed in with the other PG-13 posts. Coming across nude photos shouldn't be unexpected. For me, it's not about being offended... It's more because I have 11-year-old kids who tend to be home when I'm home. I don't want to have to slam my computer shut anytime they walk into the room for fear that I might accidentally stumble across photos they have no business looking at. If posts containing nudity are in a special location on Patnet then I wouldn't find myself innocently going through a post and accidentally scrolling down to the above photo from mc-nudes.com. For those of you who have kids, you know that the minute you have something like that up on your screen, accidentally, is the exact moment the kid comes right up behind you. For those of you who don't have kids... it's the precise moment your boss sidles up behind you. As for kids... They've got eyes like hawks... I don't want to have to explain this kind of thing. And it's not appropriate for my son to be introduced to this stuff by his mother.
Don't you want us to like natural women?
Okay, I tried to find a photo that would depict what I'm describing, but when I googled it, all kinds of stuff regarding "titty fucking" came up, so I decided to use my words, instead.
I agree with you. Natural does look way better. I just like them a little smaller, so there is less "overhang" onto the rib cage. I think that c-cup (b-cup on a really petite woman) gives the impression of some size, yet isn't so big that the nipples are pointing downward.
Now this is the part where I might get to see the depths of immaturity on this site... So looking forward to it.
That is one feature that I actually really like about myself. And no, I'm not going to put up a picture. I've never had implants. I'm a 32-c. So, I'm not flat...They qualify as a handful. But as a thin woman, any bigger wouldn't look right. Because they aren't big, my nipples point slightly upward. If you tried to put a pencil between the underside of the breast and the rib cage, the pencil wouldn't stay for very long. The advantage of this kind of sizing (for you young men out there) is that those types of breasts are more likely to stand the test of time. If the nipples are pointing downward and the breast appears almost pendulous when a woman is 20, what do you think they are going to look like when she's 40? Though some of you are inclined to trade-in when the woman reaches 40, I imagine that there are some who might feel differently. That said, if I were a guy, I'd go for a woman whose figure looks like it will stand the test of time and respond well to the inevitable effects of gravity. The really big ones never do without medical intervention. Unless, of course, you like a woman who can actually throw her breasts over her shoulders.
Oh, and let us not forget, really large breasts tend to have some distortion to the nipples themselves. They appear stretched and sometimes even a little misshapen. Getting back to our 32.-c example, the nipples look like nice neat quarters.
I don't want to have to explain this kind of thing. And it's not appropriate for my son to be introduced to this stuff by his mother.
BOOM. You walked into one, again. You're starting to walk into a lot of stuff, recently.
I know, it was a very clever setup to see if boobs make men's brains not function. Mine is still working.
Now this is the part where I get to see the depths of immaturity on this site... So looking forward to it.
Being serious for a moment, and (this is) not about Turtledove: I'm against the concept of "immaturity" as a designation for people that do things that one does not approve of. People who do questionable things should not be able to hide behind "immaturity". In particular, people should not be able to explain away their past sins or misdeeds as "immaturity". They knew damn well what they were doing.
Now back to the titties: I'm not all that obsessed with size. I'm more into nice nipples. Pokey ones.
Now this is the part where I get to see the depths of immaturity on this site... So looking forward to it.
Actually I agree with you entirely. You sound like a connoisseur, much as I always considered myself. The larger breasts are, the less likely they are to have a nice shape to them (as you say nipples possibly pointing downwards), although it is possible, and that's awesome, but as you say, in that case it can't be retained for more than a decade or two.
I agree with you, and I think a lot of men do.
Women that get their boobs enhanced might be achieving a better look for when they are dressed, but rarely for when they are naked. My opinion.
If the nipples are pointing downward and the breast appears almost pendulous when a woman is 20, what do you think they are going to look like when she's 40? Though some of you are inclined to trade-in when the woman reaches 40, I imagine that there are some who might feel differently.
No need to trade in. Just get some aftermarket enhancements at 40 or whenever is needed. I'm a committed kind of guy. If she looks like the babe in the plot at 20, and she is giving that to me, I'm quite ok with a few wrinkles and sags at 40. The problem only is if the wrinkled40 could not be bothered at 20, but now thinks I should be a good little provider-object. Hell no.
We need experts on the physics of sag and nipple flotation vector math.
Latex dolls can be programmed with jiggle, bounce, lift and nipple morphology to suit.
However, the OP pic is several mouthfuls larger than what I would like. A real woman like that would have a few years max before soccer balling.
Like I'd said earlier, I don't want to contribute to PatNet, getting the adult label, which is bad for his business.
boobs are ok with me. i'm not even opposed to pornographic pictures in principle, but haven't really considered all the ramifications.
Pat, I'm known as a proper, but quietly improper, New Englander.
And thus, while I like to bang Canadian hoes and all that, I don't like to make my posts, look like the posts of a crude teenager and/or white trash adult.
My presentation style involves a mix of academia, cultural commentaries, and the occasional dabblings into T & A, without making it look like Al Bundy.
This is why TurtleDove is even responding to any of my posts. On some level, she knows that I'm some sort of *cultured* gentleman (Yankee of British descent typecast) but can't fathom why I'd fully rejected women for relationships and would rather bang hoes, for the rest of my natural life.
I think it's the romantic theory that every horny mutt falls in love eventually and falls hard. Then, the divining rod points in only one direction.
I'm against the concept of "immaturity" as a designation for people that do things that one does not approve of.
I added the word "might." Is that better?
Immaturity is a pretty nice word for grotesquely age inappropriate ASSHOLE!
I am guilty as charged!
I think it's the romantic theory that every horny mutt falls in love eventually and falls hard
Yes, up to the age of 29.
If one can't snap out of it, after that, let's say circa 33-34, they're hopeless.
Immaturity is a pretty nice word for grotesquely age inappropriate ASSHOLE!
I am guilty as charged!
and let's face it... when a woman posts her bra size to a group of men, she's kind of asking for it. I realize that. But I really am just trying to offer a perspective on wear and tear that only equipment owners may have. And my knowledge just doesn't come from seeing other women's naked breasts!
This is why TurtleDove is even responding to any of my posts. On some level, she knows that I'm some sort of *cultured* gentleman (Yankee of British descent typecast) but can't fathom why I'd fully rejected women for relationships and would rather bang hoes, for the rest of my natural life.
;-)
It's the difference between pragmatism and slavering, yipping obsession. Who wants to be pragmatic about tits?
I'll be more than happy to teach COBOL coding to young willing women. ;-)
Just to cross link the Star Wars thread with this one, here's a photoshopped jpeg of Natalie Portman with breast implants ...
We need some more t*tty f*cking (w/ a bit of c*ck sucking) in SW land, since the story itself sucks.
Comments 1 - 40 of 53 Next » Last » Search these comments
the following ...
That should do the trick for me.