Comments 1 - 13 of 13 Search these comments
all unverified hotair bullshit in vain attempt to sway electoral college....
"It wasn't a leak, it was a hack, and Seth Rich was murdered for it."
Putin has killed many people in the past, so I wouldn't put it past him. Was Thallium found in Mr. Rich's system?
Putin has killed many people in the past, so I wouldn't put it past him. Was Thallium found in Mr. Rich's system?
Corrected:
The Clintons have had many people killed in the past, so I wouldn't put it past them. Was Thallium found in Mr. Rich's system?
Maybe it was Putin that killed Seth Rich
i'm impressed that you're still getting paid by the DNC. must have killed it on the interview...
US intelligence officials now believe with a "High Level of Confidence" that Iraqi President Saddam Hussein became personally involved in the covert Anthrax Development campaign that is still underway in 2002 to interfere in the Middle East with Chemical Weapons, senior intelligence officials told NBC News.
Two senior officals with direct access to the information saw new intelligence shows that Saddam Hussein personally directed meetings with Al Qaeda. The intelligence came from diplomatic sources and spies working for US Allies.
This isn't evidence, of course.
"Guys, guys, hey guys, anonymous officials working in an unnamed intelligence capacity say they saw a document we can't that said..."
you really are a special type of stupid
You were speculating about Seth Rich a few days ago. For your obvious nonsensical and double standards, you are as stupid as you claim others to be.
"i'm impressed that you're still getting paid by the DNC. must have killed it on the interview..."
Yep, I interview well.
The Establishment really needs a new playbook. They keep putting forward the same basic structure of lies and don't understand that people eventually wise up to it.
Like Housewives and Shady Telemarketers in the 50s, it works at first but then most learn to hang up the phone.
"The Establishment really needs a new playbook. They keep putting forward the same basic structure of lies and don't understand that people eventually wise up to it. Like Housewives and Shady Telemarketers in the 50s, it works at first but then most learn to hang up the phone."
So, what exactly are you arguing? That Russia didn't hack the emails? That they did hack them but it wasn't to affect the election? That they did hack them to affect the election, but Putin wasn't involved?
So, what exactly are you arguing? That Russia didn't hack the emails? That they did hack them but it wasn't to affect the election? That they did hack them to affect the election, but Putin wasn't involved?
That the Establishment is bullshitting again like they did in Iraq. And Syria.
Is my argument that complicated?
Yellowcake and WMD - we have evidence - foreign intel memos and interviews with Iraqi Defectors! Chemical Warheads in less than 45 minutes!!!
BTW, Russia certainly hacked around government networks in 2016, just like we did in Russia (and China, and France, and Germany, etc. etc. etc.)
"That the Establishment is bullshitting again like they did in Iraq. And Syria. Is my argument that complicated?"
I wouldn't say complicated, just vague. My question was do you think Russians hacked the DNC?
Maybe it was Putin that killed Seth Rich