Comments 1 - 9 of 9 Search these comments
This is the tip of the iceberg that will sink the Titanic.
Anyone who actually expects REPUBLICANS OR DEMOCRATS TO ACTUALLY EVEN ATTEMPT TO SOLVE THE CRISES, INCLUDING THIS ONE, RATHER THAN SIMPLY KICK THE CAN VIA THE ISSUANCE OF MORE DEBT (thus transferring more citizens' wealth to private corporations such as Big Health Insurance, Big Pharma, etc.) IS DELUSIONAL.
Article is an advertisement for socialized medicine. We need upfront pricing, and no treatment at hospitals for the uninsured.
but yes, we should reduce doctor salary further.
Would personally agree to salary cuts if we had cradle to grave healthcare, pension and free education, but not until that point
and no treatment at hospitals for the uninsured.
All for price transparency and competition across state lines, but indigent should have access to medicaid
Even with the implementation of the Affordable Care Act, we still have 28 million people with no health insurance, and many more are under-insured due to rising co-pays and deductibles…
IOW 92-93% are insured?
APOCALYPSEFUCK_is_ADORABLE says
Rich people invest in sure-fire financial scams like "health insurance".
You're an independent contractor?
(thus transferring more citizens' wealth to private corporations such as Big Health Insurance, Big Pharma, etc
Doubt Clinton would open up insurance markets such that it becomes as easy to purchase health insurance as auto insurance. I would be equally surprised if trump did something like that.
Or make reforms to patent protection
Or ensuring that FDA decision makers don't own stocks in companies they are trying to regulate (technically forbidden, but who's looking?)
Would personally agree to salary cuts if we had cradle to grave healthcare, pension and free education, but not until that point
How about some changes to the medical education as well:
1. Start medical school right after high school, or maybe after 2 year pre-med education.
2. Significantly increase acceptance rates. Number of students can be decreased after 1-2 years, but still graduate more doctors than today.
3. Use some of the realized savings in medical costs to subsidize the medical education.
4. Pay residents higher salaries.
With the above changes pursuing a medical degree will not be such a scarifies in terms of lost years (and income) and tuition costs as it is now.
And 28 million are still underinsured, with approximately 70 million underinsured.
http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2017/01/trumpcare-obamacare-medicaid-medicare-and-the-veterans-administration.html
U.S. is on fast track to health care train wreck
In 2015 we spent $3.2 trillion on health care, which was $10,000 per person in the U.S., ($25,000 for a typical American family). This is 17.5 percent of the U.S. Gross Domestic Product (GDP). To put this in perspective, this is more than twice what most other developed nations spend on health care while insuring all of their residents. This year we are on track to exceed that amount with it being 18 percent of GDP.
Even with the implementation of the Affordable Care Act, we still have 28 million people with no health insurance, and many more are under-insured due to rising co-pays and deductibles….
Of the $3.2 trillion health spending, 70 percent goes directly to fund the cost of our healthcare. The remaining 30 percent is spent on administration and profit, which is more than twice that of any other nation. In 2014, studies published by the Institute of Medicine, Rand Corporation, and the Center for Medicare/Medicaid Services estimated that out of total health care spending, as much as $900 billion, or
about one third of our total spending, can be attributed to waste, fraud and abuse.
This current system is unsustainable, but who will tell the American public? We suggest that the solutions to the real problems of health care are hardly being talked or written about.
The ideal health insurance system is one that: provides free choice of hospitals and doctors; provides insurance coverage to all at all times (i.e., not tied to an employer); is affordable and will remove all risk of medical bankruptcy. This system should have an administrative cost of less than 5 percent and have everyone in the risk pool, thus making premiums affordable. We have such a system now: Medicare covers all persons over 65, those on total disability, and all renal dialysis patients.
Medicare, with all the fraud and other issues, still operates with about 3 percent to 4 percent overhead. That is much less than the profit and overhead added by U.S. health insurers, which is instead 15 percent to 20 percent. In addition, Obamacare, Veterans Affairs and Medicaid each add another entire layer of expensive bureaucracies. All these, along with the government being unable to bid for drugs purchased under Medicare, add up to unnecessary cost and waste in our system.
Similarly, there would be tremendous cost savings if under Medicare as a single payer, it is authorized to negotiate for hospital care on a more cost-efficient and more comparable basis across the nation.