by _ ➕follow (8) 💰tip ignore
« First « Previous Comments 185 - 224 of 258 Next » Last » Search these comments
This theory that Americans are too poor to buy food and gasoline the middle class doesn't have any data to support it
Of course it does--I already posted it. The data is inequality. The pie grows at 2%/year roughly. If more and more goes to the top 0.01%, then it means that the other 99.9% are getting less and less. This can't continue forever.
They won't refuse to buy food and gas-they just won't be able to afford it.
I have heard of this theory that debt servicing for food and gasoline will go away
I just to buy it due to the distribution of income to consumption for both and not to mention we have SNAP today too
I've not read all the comments. Has anyone caught on to Logan.
He's so invested in his economic theology that he is doing everything to convince himself that the status quo can continue.
Living in fear is not the best choice of lifestyle.
Damned old data.
http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2014/10/09/for-most-workers-real-wages-have-barely-budged-for-decades/
Damned old data.
Like I said you can't read data properly hence why you think everyone is poor outside the 1%
I understand why you do what you do.. but you're completely voided 7 decades of data
also your baseline assumption is that majority of Americans are poor living in high cost areas
I understand why you do what you do.. but you're completely voided 7 decades of data
How does a median household income of $58K void anything I do? Half of all US households earn less than $58K/year. You don't see a problem there?
also your baseline assumption is that majority of Americans are poor living in high cost areas
How is that one of my assumptions?
Does the bright future outlook take into consideration the potential impact of climate change, or that would be anti-American?
How does a median household income of $58K void anything I do? Half of all US households earn less than $58K/year. You don't see a problem there?
No it's not a problem. You have the opportunity to earn more.
They won't refuse to buy food and gas-they just won't be able to afford it.
Have you seen how fat Americans have become? It's due to eating too much food. Less food would definitely be a plus.
Have you seen how fat Americans have become? It's due to eating too much food. Less food would definitely be a plus.
Actually healthy foods are more expensive which is part of the problem.
Have you seen how fat Americans have become? It's due to eating too much food. Less food would definitely be a plus.
Actually healthy foods are more expensive which is part of the problem.
Eat more fruits and salads. They are much cheaper than McDonald's.
You have the opportunity to earn more.
Yeah, everybody should get a PhD, MD, JD, or become a financial blogger/writer and make > $100K. Educate people, educate!
You have the opportunity to earn more.
Yeah, everybody should get a PhD, MD, JD, or become a financial blogger/writer and make > $100K. Educate people, educate!
Don't drop out of school. Get same training on a skill. The opportunities are endless, but some people would rather not take it.
How is that one of my assumptions?
By implying that debt service cost of food and gasoline can't continue in high population areas
As a whole Americans don't make enough money to feed themselves or take transportation outside the 1%
climate change
That is my biggest X factor in the world, my discussion of resource wars is something that happens in the next century but peaking out of population hopefully helps this issue.
Outside of aging population climate change is my biggest concern
Eat more fruits and salads.
That's right! 2000 calories/day of apples and lettuce. Takes no time to prepare either - perfect for busy parents (esp. single) parents! Added benefit - children will grow slowly so less $ for new clothes.
climate change
That is my biggest X factor in the world, my discussion of resource wars is something that happens in the next century but peaking out of population hopefully helps this issue.
Outside of aging population climate change is my biggest concern
I somehow feel that entertaining the thought of climate change is anti-American.
anti-American.
It's Anti Science ... I always put Heat Temp map charting on my facebook page to make a point.. it's getting ugly heat wise
I can't believe California is on the low end.
Hey, liberal states are less obese.
It's Anti Science
Acknowledging climate change is Anti Science? That's what you are saying?
children will grow slowly so less $ for new clothes.
They will stop growing sideways for a change.
Anti Science?
Not acknowledging it is Anti Science
My fellow Republicans have a token answer that history has had cold and hot spells ... but that kind of defeat the current data
Not acknowledging it is Anti Science
Tough choice then - Anti-Science or Anti-American... Which one are you?
If I am Anti American for believing in science then I would question the thesis of the original contention
They will stop growing sideways for a change.
Yeah, poor people should have non-growing children. I agree. That will be a step forward.
"All of today's optimism brought to you by Derivatives! Derivatives...The big D...Creating Wealth, Demand and an Unwarranted Sense of Security for two Unholy Decades."
Then follows a Deutchbank Collapse, EU Collapse, China Shadow Banking Collapse, China Real Estate Demand Collapse, US Real Estate Demand by Foreign Investor Collapse.
Go Derivatives! Let's wager more money than has ever existed on the premise than no one understands them!
I think you are missing something...trolls do not read the data at all.
See you guys are doing me a favor because my thing is about Trolls not being able to read data properly
Our data is getting better with the rain recently
and snow. you should consider how much of a political screw job "climate change" is.
the climate is ALWAYS changing / always has, always will. NO ONE can with a straight face contend that humans have ANY control over the fucking weather.
I find the term Anti American troubles educated people who know they're spewing B.S. for their own agenda.
What is our agenda Logan? How do WE financially benefit from our outlook?
And you haven't answered my question Logan. Could it be because you haven't thought that far and shit just got real? Apparently something else you haven't learned. When sourcing truth, always follow the money.
How about you just answer the question I posted, and re-iterated that you have ignored. What is our financial benefit from being bears? You said we have one, put some fact behind your opinion.
A realtor has a financial incentive to be bullish always
A data miner doesn't... just reads the numbers
You are trying to side track saying you are some kind of analyst professionally, yet your top/current job on LinkedIn is:
Senior Loan Manager
AMC Lending Group
January 1996 – Present (21 years 1 month)Irvine CA
What is our financial benefit from being bears?
You're not short the market and I actually don't believe you guys believe the stuff you say
I won't answer the other part of the question as I'd like you to rephrase our reason. Your english made the response confusing, so I don't want to assume.
After 300+ comments Logan still hasn't answered my question. Posting these together so his BS and lack of thought on this subject aren't drowned out by chart spam.
« First « Previous Comments 185 - 224 of 258 Next » Last » Search these comments
https://loganmohtashami.com/2017/01/06/wage-growth-hits-cycle-high/
All your worthless crying ...... you're not men you're trolls
#Economics