0
0

Thread for orphaned comments


 invite response                
2005 Apr 11, 5:00pm   188,622 views  117,730 comments

by Patrick   ➕follow (60)   💰tip   ignore  

Thread for comments whose parent thread has been deleted

« First        Comments 79,349 - 79,388 of 117,730       Last »     Search these comments

79349   _   2017 Jan 13, 12:26pm  

All we could talk about with economist here is about demographics with professionals ... people with degrees that study demographics and the Pat.net all that matters is price ... don't care about the single most powerful economic force ever

Demographics!!!

79350   _   2017 Jan 13, 12:26pm  

Can't read data

79351   _   2017 Jan 13, 12:28pm  

No housing bubble what so ever in America

and No the builders were never going to move to their 50 year average of 1.5 Million starts not with the demographics in this cycle

They were smarter than all of you!

Guess what, they own that business you guys don't

Deal with!

79352   joeyjojojunior   2017 Jan 13, 12:35pm  

"I just provided all my data... which I do with real people ... not boy band trolls who hide behind false narrative theories. 20 years of data on my side and I got a rag tag yapping away without data. This is exactly my point..You guys can't read data properly"

Your problem is you don't understand the topic. All of your data is irrelevant. You think someone was arguing that low inventory was causing low sales numbers. Nobody here was theorizing that.

What Herc originally said was that we need more housing stock to drive prices down. And he is 100% correct. You have not and cannot present any data to dispute that.

79353   _   2017 Jan 13, 12:36pm  

joeyjojojunior says

ou have not and cannot present any data to dispute that.

Again, you can't even read what I said let alone actually read the charts that I put up

At least you have the common sense to hide behind a fake name, I give you that at least

79354   _   2017 Jan 13, 12:38pm  

Come on... bring it... bring me this logic... I can't wait

79355   joeyjojojunior   2017 Jan 13, 12:38pm  

"Again, you can't even read what I said let alone actually read the charts that I put up At least you have the common sense to hide behind a fake name, I give you that at least"

OK--so explain in your own words how those charts are relevant to the topic of low housing inventory is causing home prices to rise.

79356   missing   2017 Jan 13, 12:38pm  

Logan Mohtashami says

This is why none of you speak at conferences

Hey, hey, easy there.

79357   _   2017 Jan 13, 12:40pm  

joeyjojojunior says

low housing inventory is causing home prices to rise.

I am going to to say this in English because we all speak it

Excuse the capital letters

POST 1996 WHEN HOME PRICES DEVIATED FROM HISTORICAL NORMS, THE ABILITY TO MOVE UP FOR A HOME BUYERS WAS CONSTRAINED, THUS CREATING A NATURAL SUPPLY CURVE FOR HOME SUPPLY TO BE UNDER 6 MONTHS

AS THE CHAIN OF HOMES BEING BUILT SINCE 1975...

Were bigger and bigger homes, ... hence the housing inflation metric is based more on size of new construction

79358   _   2017 Jan 13, 12:42pm  

Remember, I went to all these conference in 2012-2013, everyone was way too bullish on home sales and housing starts because they didn't adjust to the over investment thesis of the last cycle running right into the demographic patch of this

Perfect openings for a demographic guy like me

79359   joeyjojojunior   2017 Jan 13, 12:49pm  

"POST 1996 WHEN HOME PRICES DEVIATED FROM HISTORICAL NORMS, THE ABILITY TO MOVE UP FOR A HOME BUYERS WAS CONSTRAINED, THUS CREATING A NATURAL SUPPLY CURVE FOR HOME SUPPLY TO BE UNDER 6 MONTHS

AS THE CHAIN OF HOMES BEING BUILT SINCE 1975..."

Except I'm not arguing about what the months supply should or shouldn't be. I'm saying that if prices are rising--it, by definition, means demand is higher than supply. If the issue was that people couldn't afford the higher prices, then prices would fall until sales could be made. That's what always happens in a free market. The fact that prices are rising means that isn't the case.

79360   fdhfoiehfeoi   2017 Jan 13, 12:50pm  

Hazard of the occupation. If only cops still saw things that way...

79361   joeyjojojunior   2017 Jan 13, 12:51pm  

"You keep saying the policies pushed by the Democrats, which also include globalization in its current form, are the solution"

Clinton does not equal Democrats.

79362   _   2017 Jan 13, 12:52pm  

Hilarious PAT.NET people are saying they're smarter that public traded builders

Just open a home building company and build homes like crazy

More to the reasons why the builders can't build

79363   marcus   2017 Jan 13, 12:58pm  

Heraclitusstudent says

This is the heart of the policies that caused the stagnation for western workers. And it is something you seem to favor in every political comment you are making.

I find it interesting that the big clamor about changing or reversing the offshoring of our jobs is happening now, when the globalization of manufacturing is practically over.

That's probably becasue the owners want policies that will bring production back here since soon robots will be doing the labor. Of course that won't particularly help the unskilled workers out there.

79364   _   2017 Jan 13, 1:04pm  

79365   joeyjojojunior   2017 Jan 13, 1:05pm  

"Hilarious PAT.NET people are saying they're smarter that public traded builders Just open a home building company and build homes like crazy More to the reasons why the builders can't build"

Are you having discussions with the voices in your head or something? Who says they are smarter than builders?

Builders want rising prices. Of course they aren't going to overbuild. But, it's better for the economy to have pretty much stable prices and for housing costs to take up much less of one's income.

79366   Heraclitusstudent   2017 Jan 13, 1:07pm  

joeyjojojunior says

Clinton does not equal Democrats.

No? Who else is there? Donna Brazile?

79367   joeyjojojunior   2017 Jan 13, 1:08pm  

"No? Who else is there? Donna Brazile?"

Well, you can start by looking at the voting record of Senators and Reps.

79368   _   2017 Jan 13, 1:08pm  

joeyjojojunior says

Builders want rising prices. Of course they aren't going to overbuild

Since you can't read a data ... let me give you an article with words

Why Building More Homes Won’t Help Housing Affordability

https://loganmohtashami.com/2016/07/25/why-building-more-homes-wont-help-housing-affordability/

79369   joeyjojojunior   2017 Jan 13, 1:11pm  

"Since you can't read a data ... let me give you an article with words Why Building More Homes Won’t Help Housing Affordability"

I'm laughing at your idiotic article. I certainly didn't say we had a shortage of mansions. Regardless, building more homes ABSOLUTELY will help housing affordability. Even if you only built new 3000 sq foot homes, the effect would trickle down to every segment, with lower prices everywhere. This should be easy to see.

79370   _   2017 Jan 13, 1:12pm  

PLEASE... keep this act up!!!

You're all making my points ... about the internet .. which is my 15 year project :-)

79371   joeyjojojunior   2017 Jan 13, 1:13pm  

Typical Logan.

79373   _   2017 Jan 13, 1:21pm  

No Housing Bubble in America today because there is no speculation demand what so ever, most real demand curve ever and the safest buyers ever!

That is what the thread was is about..

79374   joeyjojojunior   2017 Jan 13, 1:23pm  

"Just read it and you will know what I am talking about"

I read it and commented on why it is wrong in my last post.

79375   _   2017 Jan 13, 1:25pm  

joeyjojojunior says

Regardless, building more homes ABSOLUTELY will help housing affordability.

This is where I trap people in the debate... I will give you guys a course on how to do this

1 . Did the building from 1994-2007 create cheaper housing or was that the most expensive housing market ever

79376   joeyjojojunior   2017 Jan 13, 1:28pm  

"This is where I trap people in the debate... I will give you guys a course on how to do this 1 . Did the building from 1994-2007 create cheaper housing or was that the most expensive housing market ever"

Logan--please don't continue this. I promise you are going to look like a fool.

http://www.env-econ.net/supply_demand.html

79377   _   2017 Jan 13, 1:28pm  

joeyjojojunior says

Logan--please don't continue this. I promise you are going to look like a fool.

Answer the question?

79378   _   2017 Jan 13, 1:33pm  

Logan Mohtashami says

So answer the question

If you don't want to answer the question that is fine, a lot people realize what they got them selves into once they take 2 minutes to think about it

;-)

This is why none of you own a home building company

79379   joeyjojojunior   2017 Jan 13, 1:33pm  

I ask you honestly Logan--do you understand the theory of supply and demand and how it relates to prices?

79380   _   2017 Jan 13, 1:34pm  

joeyjojojunior says

I ask you honestly Logan--do you understand the theory of supply and demand and how it relates to prices?

Logan Mohtashami says

So answer the question, did all that building, one of the highest building rates in decades create cheaper housing

79381   _   2017 Jan 13, 1:35pm  

Logan Mohtashami says

So answer the question,

Again, if you feel trapped, don't feel bad... remember it's a trap question

79382   joeyjojojunior   2017 Jan 13, 1:35pm  

"So answer the question, did all that building, one of the highest building rates in decades create cheaper housing"

Yes, it created cheaper housing than would have existed absent the building boom. The higher prices were driven by the excess demand caused by the underwriting standards being abandoned.

So now answer mine. Do you understand supply and demand?

79383   _   2017 Jan 13, 1:35pm  

joeyjojojunior says

Yes, it created cheaper housing

79384   _   2017 Jan 13, 1:36pm  

This is why none of you own a professional home building company

79385   joeyjojojunior   2017 Jan 13, 1:36pm  

Wow--using CIC's trick of cutting off my answer? Well done.

Purposely disingenuous. Popular trolling trick.

79386   AdamCarollaFan   2017 Jan 13, 1:36pm  

joeyjojojunior says

If you couldn't muster up the courage to buy in 2011-2013, I'm not really sure what you are waiting for?

you're right! i'm a nervous nelly! too much of a think!

79387   _   2017 Jan 13, 1:37pm  

Logan Mohtashami says

Yes, it created cheaper housing

Adjusting to inflation home prices where the highest ever in 2003-2006 right when the peak of construction boom happened

79388   _   2017 Jan 13, 1:38pm  

So did all that building create cheaper housing? or was that period the highest real home price inflation rates ever?

« First        Comments 79,349 - 79,388 of 117,730       Last »     Search these comments

Please register to comment:

api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   random   suggestions   gaiste