« First « Previous Comments 6 - 45 of 62 Next » Last » Search these comments
This is the Big Story to emerge from all of this.
Watch the same Media that stretched to find anything on Trump, to dismiss Lynch's pressuring of Comey (and her 'serendipitous' meeting with Bill Clinton) as not even worthy of looking at.
Oops just happened - CNN roundtable just said "This Lynch thing won't get a lot of attention" - which means "We're going to do our best not to cover this."
Oops just happened - CNN roundtable just said "This Lynch thing won't get a lot of attention" - which means "We're going to do our best not to cover this."
Pretty much. CNN is so full of shit lately.
I've been reading on liberal news sites in the comments about Comey's testimony, and it's all been pretty positive for Trump. People are asking "What was all the fuss about Russia then?" This is on far left leaning websites. I think these people have been red pilled.
Comey has exposed that she was never investigated and the whole Obama administration was compromised.
Liberals are going to Rue the day they agitated lies about Russia. Dumb fucks, this is going to sink the fucking lot of them.
This date will be a Liberal day of silence to mourn the death of their party.
Sen. Richard Burr: Are you confident that no votes cast in the 2016 presidential election were altered?
Dir. James Comey: I'm confident. When I left as director, I had seen no indication of that whatsoever.
Burr: Dir. Comey, did the President at any time ask you to stop the FBI investigation into Russian involvement in the 2016 U.S. elections?
Comey: Not to my understanding, no.
Burr: Did any individual working for this administration, including the Justice Department, ask you to stop the Russian investigation?
Comey: No.
Are the Democrats kidding me? This whole Comey thing has back fired in their faces.
"The funny thing is it has completely blown up in the face of CNN and its Democrat allies. Some of the lies CNN/NYT/MSNBC have been exposed completely"
Complete BS. Nobody ever wrote that Trump was under investigation.
They didn't try to imply it?
CNN is fuckin' fake news.
Nope. And, in fact, other senior officials at the FBI disputed Comey's statement that Trump wasn't under investigation per today's testimony.
ope. And, in fact, other senior officials at the FBI disputed Comey's statement that Trump wasn't under investigation per today's testimony.
Oh, so Comey is a liar now?
Who are these unnamed, anonymous sources?
No--it's a judgment call. At what point does one become "under investigation"
They're senior officials at the FBI.
Ask Comey--probably he'll reveal them in the closed door session this afternoon. But, I wouldn't think it would be too difficult to guess--unless you are implying that Comey is lying?
Stupid fuck Republicans let G.W.Bush & Republicans kill Americans based on a LIE.
We need to investigate Lynch to find out how many Americans she killed.
Hope Republican's children in the military are captured & tortured.
ISIS response: What goes around,comes around!
Republican love crimes against humanity.
Bush & his Republican Admin. should have been tried in the Hague &
if found guilty,EXECUTED.
BOYCOTT ALL Republicans.
How many Rep/Con patnetters are Communist sympathizers buying
China exports?
Nope. And, in fact, other senior officials at the FBI disputed Comey's statement that Trump wasn't under investigation per today's testimony.
Please provide a credible link to your allegation. And, no, a CNN attributed "unamed source" is not a credible link.
Please provide a credible link to your allegation. And, no, a CNN attributed "unamed source" is not a credible link.
With Names, Dates, Time, Position and Title please! :-)
So we can confirm - so much #FakeNews out there.
Journalism 2017:
"We don't need no stinkin' supporting evidence, we can just run a story wholly based on anonymous sources. To say otherwise is Old Fart Journalism, legacy, outdated."
Journalism 1957:
"We can't run stories wholly based on anonymous sources, Bill. Otherwise our three other competitors will clean our clock for sloppy reporting and we'll lose influence, prestige, and subscribers to ALL the other newspapers."
"The funny thing is it has completely blown up in the face of CNN and its Democrat allies. Some of the lies CNN/NYT/MSNBC have been exposed completely"
Complete BS. Nobody ever wrote that Trump was under investigation.
They didn't try to imply it?
CNN is fuckin' fake news.
This is why no one should trust the media anymore.
They are not objective in the least. They have a completely one-sided political agenda and are squandering their credibility daily to push it.
Of course I'm waiting for Jake Tapper to now call Comey completely unreliable, a liar, and a Trump supporter.
No, first thing they do is selectively quote, call it a victory, and hope no one who they cant call racist notices.
Comey leaked info to the media-nice-he certainly was the leaker in chief. That shows his character-what a tool-what other stuff did he do to defend his empire?
I didn't watch the whole thing. But looks like one of the things Comey admitted to leaking was classified???????
I didn't watch the whole thing. But looks like one of the things Comey admitted to leaking was classified???????
He did. He admitted to leaking Memos. He also admitted that Lynch pressured him to forget the Hillary investigation and due to that he was forced to publicly announce the investigation to keep it from getting buried.
Lynch should go to prison, and probably be bunk mates with Comey.
Not all memos are classified.
Yes, but there is a lot of talking that one of the memos or docuemnt was classified. His behavior clearly justifies the firing-Director of FBI -LOL..
"Yes, but there is a lot of talking that one of the memos or docuemnt was classified. His behavior clearly justifies the firing-Director of FBI -LOL.."
Which one?
Which one?
That is what I am asking. leaking memos shows his unfitness for this type of job. But if he leaked classified stuff-he needs to go to jail-that si what I am trying to find out.
I didn't watch the whole thing. But looks like one of the things Comey admitted to leaking was classified???????
I didn't watch the entire thing either. I heard the part where Comey admitted to leaking his memo. Isnt a conversation w the president classified?
How is Loretta Lynch not in jail for Obstruction of Justice?
Back to the thread...
Is moderating public phrasing from your underlings Obstruction? It certainly seems more manipulative than anything Trump did.
I think both situations are far from evidence of obstruction. Didn't Lynch plead the 5th? We need her in a hearing
Lynch should be forced to talk to a Congressional Committee about possible collusion between Obama, Clinton's, and the Obama DOJ. Put her in front of Trey Gowdy. I'd pay money to view that.
Uh, the underlying intent was not to "change a word", that's the dishonest leftist interpretation of Comey's words. The actual reality was Lynch was telling Comey to "bury this investigation or else". Comey himself said he publicly outed the investigation into Hillary's e-mails because he felt that Lynch was pressuring him to bury the whole thing.
1. Comey admitted under oath that Loretta Lynch was attempting to get Comey to characterize the investigation as a "matter" to more closely align with the Clinton Campaign's narrative of the issue.
Comey said that when he asked Lynch if she was going to authorize him to confirm the existence of the Clinton email investigation, her answer was, “Yes, but don’t call it that. Call it a matter.†When Comey asked why, he said, Lynch wouldn’t give him an explanation. “Just call it a matter,†she said.
Comey added later that he was concerned about that direction as it was false. He was further concerned because it aligned with the Clinton campaign’s spin on the investigation.
Lynch’s order, Comey said, “concerned me because that language tracked the way the campaign was talking about the FBI’s work and that’s concerning.â€
“I don’t know whether it was intentional or not but it gave the impression that the attorney general [Lynch] was looking to align the way we talked about our work with the way the political campaign was describing the same activity, which was inaccurate,†Comey added.
2. Comey admitted under oath that Loretta Lynch used her power to try and help Clinton in a CLEAR conflict of interest.
When asked by Texas Sen. John Cornyn if it would be fair to say Lynch had a “conflict of interest†in the Clinton email investigation, Comey answered in the affirmative. “That’s fair,†he said.
3. Comey admitted under oath that the "secret meeting between" Bill Clinton and Lynch is why he decided to go public about the true nature of the investigation into Clinton's e-mail and servers because he wanted to seperate the FBI from the actions of Loretta Lynch.
Comey cited Lynch’s secret tarmac meeting with Bill Clinton as a reason he chose to hold the press conference, he said, as he was concerned about preserving the independence of the FBI.
This is about as CLEAR as it gets when it comes to an appointed official attempting to use their power to influence, not only the investigation, but also to mislead the public at large to the true nature of the investigation into Hillary Clinton's e-mails.
The actual reality was Lynch was telling Comey to "bury this investigation or else".
The dichotomy of perspective is all in the subtext.
I don't think there can be a resolution of the different perspectives. Can we get Lynch into a hearing? Or do we have to indict her for that to happen, considering she pled the 5th?
3. Comey admitted under oath that the "secret meeting between" Bill Clinton and Lynch is why he decided to go public about the true nature of the investigation into Clinton's e-mail and servers because he wanted to seperate the FBI from the actions of Loretta Lynch.
Can we bring Bill into a fucking hearing? This tarmac meeting is at the center of a lot narratives
The actual reality was Lynch was telling Comey to "bury this investigation or else".
The dichotomy of perspective is all in the subtext.
I don't think there can be a resolution of the different perspectives. Can we get Lynch into a hearing? Or do we have to indict her for that to happen, considering she pled the 5th?
At this point it really doesn't matter in all honesty. The Comey testimony has pretty much confirmed everything most honest people in the public already believed.
1) Trump and Russia was a big nothing. Completely invented fairytale by the democrats who are still stunned and reeling from the horrible campaign run by Hillary Clinton that cost them the Presidency and then the SCOTUS.
2) Comey made himself far too disruptive in an attempt to satisfy his corrupt bosses, and also to maintain the integrity of the FBI. He should have picked one side or the other, but his behavior showed that he deserved to get fired (as the Democrats wanted in November 2016, then all of sudden "didn't want" in May 2017 ).
3) The straw that broke the camels back is that Comey admitted 3 times to Trump that he was not under investigation, and all Trump wanted was for Comey to publicly say this and he would have kept his job, Comey did not do this. I believe this ultimately sealed Comey's fate since it infuriated Trump.
4) Trump wanted Comey to "wrap up" the Flynn investigation for better or worse, but not let it linger for 1-2 years as it seemed it might do. It was becoming a distraction since the media was using it to beat Trump over the head with, and the evidence of wrong doing was paper, translucently thin. Certainly LESS than the evidence that Hillary Clinton transferred classified data through the use of a private server, yet Comey let this shit nugget hang around for months instead of saying what everyone knows (and what will eventually be publicly concluded), Flynn is not guilty of any wrong doing.
Can we bring Bill into a fucking hearing? This tarmac meeting is at the center of a lot narratives
Rapist Bill and Loretta Lynch literally have no single non-criminal reason for having a private meeting during the investigation of his wife by the FBI. None. Most Democrats won't even defend the action, instead they choose to ignore it.
Cant you just accept that it was pure coincidence that Bill and Loretta were there at the same time?
Fuck no.
Bill and AG Lynch somehow being in the "same area" at the same time while the public fervor around his wife, who is under investigation by the FBI for mishandling classified information, has grown to an earth shattering roar. yeah that just randomly happened.
That's about as "random" as Obama handing the Iranians hundreds of millions of dollars and the Iranians releasing U.S prisoners literally weeks apart, but "no Obama didn't give money for prisoners". Random.
nbsp;None of that is alleged by Comey. Instead, the fired FBI Director recounts how President Trump expressed compassion for the man he dismissed as his National Security Adviser, calling Michael Flynn a good guy who has been through a lot.
Bill and AG Lynch somehow being in the "same area" at the same time while the public fervor around his wife, who is under investigation by the FBI for mishandling classified information,
So if HRC would have won, then people would be ranting LRE (Lynch Rigged Election), rather than PRE (Putin Rigged Election).
In reality - could have either rigged the election? If so please explain.
« First « Previous Comments 6 - 45 of 62 Next » Last » Search these comments
Are you fucking kidding me? Private tarmac meeting with the husband of a women who is under active FBI investigation, and the AG is pressuring the FBI director to not call it an investigation?
This is one of the most slam dunk cases of obstruction of justice I have ever seen in my life time. Lynch, and BOTH Clinton's should be facing a federal trial.
I'm not some hardcore right winger, I'm actually slightly left leaning on most topics. But this incredible corruption during the Obama administration needs some consequences.