patrick.net

SoftShell says

He just wants to know if you will enjoy it, or just be performing a necessary evil...

I can assure you that it is impossible that anyone would enjoy sex with indigenous.

indigenous says

Dan8267 says

The thought that was the case; they were wrong. That doesn't mean they were conspiring to cover anything up.

Sure they are...

See that part where you used ellipses? That's where you're suppose to put the evidence.

indigenous says

Oh ok so then it is ok, for sure tell that to the families involved it wasn't as bad as the mistakes Bush made.

Gladly. Not knowing the cause of the Benghazi attack five hours after the attack isn't as bad as causing the deaths of a million innocent people including young children. Had they never made the mistake of thinking that the anti-Mohammad film was the instigating factor, it would not have changed anything at all. It certainly would not have brought the dead back to life.

However, had Bush not lied about Iraq to start a war this child would not be dead.

Nor would many others

Line up the bodies of the children, the thousands of children — the infants, the toddlers, the schoolkids — whose bodies were torn to pieces, burned alive or riddled with bullets during the American invasion and occupation of Iraq. Line them up in the desert sand, walk past them, mile after mile, all those twisted corpses, those scraps of torn flesh and seeping viscera, those blank faces, those staring eyes fixed forever on nothingness.

This is the reality of what happened in Iraq; there is no other reality…

You are a fucking asshole for even attempting to equate the two.

Dan8267 says

That's a pretty lame and juvenile passive-aggressive attack.

It was in response to you trying to assert yourself as the alpha.
IOW don't flatter yourself.

Dan8267 says

Evidence plus sarcasm may make a point, but sarcasm without any evidence or reasoning does not.

Catch me up, I'm not going to try and piece together what you are talking about

Dan8267 says

Just answer the question.

What was the question

Dan8267 says

Bull-fucking-shit. If Obama gave weapons to Islamic terrorists, you and the entire Republican Party would be calling for his immediate execution as a traitor.

He did through fast and furious. Regarding which Eric Holder became the first member of a cabinet to be held in contempt of congress.

But it is irrelevant in that both were wrong, although North was convicted and punished for the crime.

Dan8267 says

Honey, it's not projecting when it's based on empirical evidence. You use the term "projecting" as "I can't think of any reason why you're wrong, so I'll make shit up."

Example: The math teacher said that the square root of two is irrational, but he's just projecting.

Nope it is just a fact, that much of what is said is not a fact rather name calling. E.G. you calling me honey.

"Psychological projection is the act or technique of defending oneself against unpleasant impulses by denying their existence in oneself, while attributing them to others"

Math is just an a priori fact it is not projecting.

Call it Crazy says

Here Dan, this might help you with the definition of "listening":

1lis·ten

verb \ˈli-sən\

: to pay attention to someone or something in order to hear what is being said, sung, played, etc.

—used to tell a person to listen to what you are saying

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/listen

figure of speech
noun, plural figures of speech. Rhetoric .
any expressive use of language, as a metaphor, simile, personification, or antithesis, in which words are used in other than their literal sense, or in other than their ordinary locutions, in order to suggest a picture or image or for other special effect.
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/figure+of+speech

I also suggest a new word, Benghaziphilia, meaning
Deliberate misinterpretation for the purpose of avoiding the truth.

Example usage: Indigenous's Benghaziphillia caused him to think that Patrick.net had a built-in screen reader after Dan mentioned people listening to a thread.

Dan8267 says

See that part where you used ellipses? That's where you're suppose to put the evidence.

A lot of people have been trying. Somehow that incendiary video story just doesn't seem plausible.

indigenous says

Dan8267 says

Bull-fucking-shit. If Obama gave weapons to Islamic terrorists, you and the entire Republican Party would be calling for his immediate execution as a traitor.

He did through fast and furious.

Boy are you grasping for Straws to suggest that Obama was responsible for Fast and Furious but Reagan was not for Iran Contra. Does the level of ridiculousness have no bearing on which lies you pick to say? You really should start factoring in ridiculousness into those decisions.

Dan8267 says

However, had Bush not lied about Iraq to start a war this child would not be dead.

By comparison Obama seems like a choir boy

Dan8267 says

I can assure you that it is impossible that anyone would enjoy sex with indigenous.

Are you propositioning me?

Dan8267 says

Boy are you grasping for Straws to suggest that Obama was responsible for Fast and Furious but Reagan was not for Iran Contra. Does the level of ridiculousness have no bearing on which lies you pick to say? You really should start factoring in ridiculousness into those decisions.

Your indignant ad hominem aside how so?

indigenous says

By comparison Obama seems like a choir boy

Oh Obama is certainly evil, perhaps accomplishing more evil acts than even Bush, but for reasons that are real not because of your childish lies.

indigenous says

Dan8267 says

I can assure you that it is impossible that anyone would enjoy sex with indigenous.

Are you propositioning me?

If you take that as a proposition, you must not have ever received real interest.

indigenous says

Your indignant ad hominem aside how so?

Indignant means feeling or showing anger or annoyance at what is perceived as unfair treatment. I'm showing annoyance at stupidity and deception. It has nothing to do with me and everything to do with you.

And as for how so, Obama has less connection to the execution of Fast and Furious than Chris Christie had to the execution of Bridgeghazi!

Dan8267 says

And as for how so, Obama has less connection to the execution of Fast and Furious than Chris Christie had to the execution of Bridgeghazi!

And yet his AG is found in contempt of congress (1st in history), he must take plausible deniability to a new level.

This made me laugh:

indigenous says

Dan8267 says

And as for how so, Obama has less connection to the execution of Fast and Furious than Chris Christie had to the execution of Bridgeghazi!

And yet his AG is found in contempt of congress (1st in history), he must take plausible deniability to a new level.

Keep grasping at those straws.

Eric Holder should be in prison having been found guilty of Contempt of Congress for withholding evidence in a criminal investigation. But that has nothing to do with Obama.

It has a lot to do with Bush and you damn republicans though. Because of Bush and other republicans there is no chance that Eric Holder or any other executive officer will ever be punished for crimes because of the real Bush doctrine, the one that goes, executive privilege trumps the law.

You're upset that Holder walked away scott-free after thumbing his noise at Congress? Blame republicans. I would have thrown his ass in prison the moment he refuse to comply with the subpoena for evidence.

We liberals believe in rule of law. You conservatives believe in suspending laws when they don't suit your agenda.

indigenous says

I'd personally blow the president if we could have the awesome economy we had during the Clinton years, and all of business would thank me for it.

If blow jobs for the president keep the economy going smoothly, there should a strategic reserve of fat chicks who like to suck cock.

Whatever I'm not going to defend Bush either.

But wouldn't you rather eat Bush than Hillbilly?

The deal is that the laws/rules have to be clear and enforced otherwise no one gives a shit about following them and those that do give a shit are cowed by not knowing what to do.

Dan8267 says

However, had Bush not lied about Iraq to start a war this child would not be dead

That is very heartwrenching imagery there Dan.

FortWayne says

That is very heartwrenching imagery there

And mine wasn't?

FortWayne says

Dan8267 says

However, had Bush not lied about Iraq to start a war this child would not be dead

That is very heartwrenching imagery there Dan.

Sometimes the truth is harsh. But to let a tragedy go to waste by not learning a lesson from it and allowing it to be repeated is a moral travesty.

Dan8267 says

I'd personally blow the president

QFP

PS. Dan marked this as ad hominem. How the fuck quoting someone qualifies as ad hominem? It's your own fucking words!

Dan, more civility.

Straw Man says

Dan, more civility.

Straw Man, less hypocrisy.

Straw Man says

I'd personally blow young children

QFP

Dan8267 says

Straw Man says

Dan, more civility.

Straw Man, less hypocrisy.

Les than 0? Would be hard to implement.

Dan8267 says

Straw Man says

[here used to be some fake quote manufactured by dan ]

QFP

Yeah, I did get under your skin this time real good, didn't I?

PS. Doesn't qualify for ad hominem.

Straw Man says

Les than 0? Would be hard to implement.

Now that piggy has left, you are the biggest hypocrite on PatNet. Congratulations on assuming his throne. I suspect your presence here will continue to drive newcomers away from PatNet, impoverishing the entire community. And that is the most success you will achieve in life.

Straw Man says

Yeah, I did get under your skin this time real good, didn't I?

You wish. I simply demonstrated why your posts are nothing but thinly veiled ad hominem attacks and lies.

Iraq has WMD.

Dan8267 says

thinly veiled ad hominem attacks and lies.

The cornerstone for Patnet.