by GNL ➕follow (1) 💰tip ignore
« First « Previous Comments 33 - 53 of 53 Search these comments
Again, whites are not allowed to have pride and must assimilate into a mixed race. There are differences in the races. Sorry if you cannot believe your lyin eyes. Or you lyin history.
My history says that nearly all of us are mixed race. I have some Asian ancestry from about 8 generations ago.
I also tend to believe that people who think that mixing race is bad are as stupid as ones who think that screaming about black pride is any different than screaming about white pride. I do not understand how can anyone be proud of someones' else achievements just because they tend to share skin or eye color, gender, or sexual orientation. The fact that Einstein was Jewish and white has no bearing on the white idiot who drove into crowd yesterday. The fact that Avicenna was Persian has no bearing on Ahmadinejad.
Again, whites are not allowed to have pride and must assimilate into a mixed race.
Do you want to live in a whites only country? Do you want the US to be white only?
If so, from a practical matter, how do you think that goal should be accomplished?
There is no movement to kill off white people. Further, as a member of the majority, you probably rarely if ever get judged by the color of your skin.
There is no movement at this point to kill of black people as well. White people are constantly being discriminated against in hiring. I have seen minority persons getting tenure with 1-2 publications, while whites and Asians need upwards of 10.
The only rational solution is to ignore race and judge people as humans ONLY.
This is a human trait. Gonna change? Don't think so.
It won't change because identity politics is easy, aka lazy.
But if people want to stop being lazy about their interactions with people, they should drop it entirely.
I have seen minority persons getting tenure with 1-2 publications, while whites and Asians need upwards of 10.
In what field is anybody getting tenure with 1-2 publications?
There is no movement at this point to kill of black people as well.
True. I was responding directly to WorkInProgress's post where he claimed WorkInProgress says
White guilt = genocide in the long run
That seems pretty paranoid to me.
In what field is anybody getting tenure with 1-2 publications?
Biology, physics, chemistry. More than one example, so this is an endemic problem. Asian/white males need 10 or more at those schools.
Again, whites are not allowed to have pride and must assimilate into a mixed race. There are differences in the races. Sorry if you cannot believe your lyin eyes. Or you lyin history.
My history says that nearly all of us are mixed race. I have some Asian ancestry from about 8 generations ago.
I also tend to believe that people who think that mixing race is bad are as stupid as ones who think that screaming about black pride is any different than screaming about white pride. I do not understand how can anyone be proud of someones' else achievements just because they tend to share skin or eye color, gender, or sexual orientation. The fact that Einstein was Jewish and white has no bearing on the white idiot who drove into crowd yesterday. The fact that Avicenna was Persian has no bearing on Ahmadinejad.
Who said race mixing was bad? I merely said it is not bad to not race mix.
This is a human trait. Gonna change? Don't think so.
It won't change because identity politics is easy, aka lazy.
But if people want to stop being lazy about their interactions with people, they should drop it entirely.
Ain't gonna happen. It's human nature. As natural as looking out for your own self interest.
White guilt = genocide in the long run
That seems pretty paranoid to me.
Agreed. White guilt=stupidity - that is how I can think about this.
I have seen minority persons getting tenure with 1-2 publications, while whites and Asians need upwards of 10.
In what field is anybody getting tenure with 1-2 publications?
There is no movement at this point to kill of black people as well.
True. I was responding directly to WorkInProgress's post where he claimed WorkInProgress says
White guilt = genocide in the long run
That seems pretty paranoid to me.
Taken to it's logical end, trying to erase history of a people CAN lead to genocide. See them as less than human and you can do anything to them.
Biology, physics, chemistry. More than one example, so this is an endemic problem. Asian/white males need 10 or more at those schools.
I'd agree. 1 to 2 publications is not enough, regardless of HR goals.
Taken to it's logical end, trying to erase history of a people CAN lead to genocide.
Are you referring to taking down monuments when you say 'erasing history?' You think that will logically lead to genocide? Is anybody at all convinced by that argument?
The only thing I've seen lead to gennoacide are beliefs which push an unjustified narrative of blaming another race/group for broad societal problems and especially beliefs which believe one type of people is superior to another. The greatest amount of human death by violence has occurred because of this. This is as tribal, primitive, and ugly as a human can be.
Taken to it's logical end, trying to erase history of a people CAN lead to genocide.
Are you referring to taking down monuments when you say 'erasing history?' You think that will logically lead to genocide? Is anybody at all convinced by that argument?
It gets tiring answering people who do not listen/read for comprehension. I said...CAN lead....
Also, it most certainly HAS lead to it.
It gets tiring answering people who do not listen/read for comprehension. I said...CAN lead....
Does that mean that you are walking back from this?
WorkInProgress says
White guilt = genocide in the long run.
My comprehension of your ideas reflects both comments. If you find that multiple people are not interpreting your posts the way you intended, you might try writing more clearly.
It gets tiring answering people who do not listen/read for comprehension. I said...CAN lead....
Does that mean that you are walking back from this?
WorkInProgress saysWhite guilt = genocide in the long run.
My comprehension of your ideas reflects both comments. If you find that multiple people are not interpreting your posts the way you intended, you might try writing more clearly.
Ok, I see, I said that in one comment and then said it differently in another. Good catch.
BTW...
Since Egyptians are not Europeans, then our civilization can not be based on influence of European genes.
I'm not sure the term "European genes" is scientifically meaningful. Europe is an arbitrary political boundary that has nothing to do with geography or biology. But yes, genetic lineage can be traced to paths of migrations, and the cultural influences do cross genetically different groups because of trade and social interactions. This was true even in antiquity.
« First « Previous Comments 33 - 53 of 53 Search these comments
patrick.net
An Antidote to Corporate Media
1,199,703 comments by 14,173 users - Patrick online now