by Patrick ➕follow (60) 💰tip ignore
Comments 1 - 40 of 97 Next » Last » Search these comments
Can anyone explain why they measure co2 from an active volcano?
Not sure this would be the case in most places.
So plants intake carbon dioxide. You really care about the environment, plant a tree, grow a vegetable garden. Move out of the city.
Can anyone explain why they measure co2 from an active volcano?
Patrick saysLonger growing seasons,
Not sure this would be the case in most places.
Why not? According to the alarmists, CO2 raises the temperature, and everyone knows plants love CO2.
Aren't both of those situations (warmer and more CO2) beneficial to plants?
Can anyone explain why they measure co2 from an active volcano?
Onvacation saysCan anyone explain why they measure co2 from an active volcano?
Isotopic signature demonstrates added carbon in atmosphere comes predominantly from fossil fuels.
Not to mention simple accounting show humans emit twice as much carbon as the increase in the atmosphere.
That's easy to explain and easy for any honest person to understand if they bother to look it up.
In any case, now is the time for a complete embargo of Africa and to start developing and spraying birth control there.
Interesting? Makes me wonder about the methodology. Do you have a source for the "isotopic signature" study?
anon_01798 saysWhy not? According to the alarmists, CO2 raises the temperature, and everyone knows plants love CO2.
Aren't both of those situations (warmer and more CO2) beneficial to plants?
Depends on what it does to relative humidity. Last I checked, plants don't love the Sahara. Nor do they love getting 8" of rain in a day.
We literally have to have an increase of 1C in the next decade to match the average of 102 historical IPCC forecasts.
IPCC Climate Models are wayyyyyy off from observed reality. Until their predictions fall closer to observed reality, they should be discounted.
Sprawl is very energy intensive.
Onvacation saysInteresting? Makes me wonder about the methodology. Do you have a source for the "isotopic signature" study?
Do you have Google on your computer?
TwoScoopsPlissken saysIPCC Climate Models are wayyyyyy off from observed reality. Until their predictions fall closer to observed reality, they should be discounted.
There is even a gif debunking your image:
Why a gif, if only to disallow any serious dissection of the displayed information...
A manually controlled slideshow would have given more validity to the subject matter.
because of the nature of organic plant decay that emits CO2, such a mass spectrometry analysis is bogus.
So, it's just another line of evidence, strengthening the case for what should be obvious.
So, it's just another line of evidence, strengthening the case for what should be obvious.
BlueSardine saysWhy a gif, if only to disallow any serious dissection of the displayed information...
A manually controlled slideshow would have given more validity to the subject matter.
What next? Are you going to say that the creator of the gif drives a red car, and only people with blue cars are trustworthy?
So charts displayed for 2 seconds constitutes irrefutable evidence. I see...
Why do you think the Earth is cooling now?
The earth is cooling because of the suns diminishing output.
I see. So how much is the sun's output falling?
Google solar cycles. It will be educational!
Comments 1 - 40 of 97 Next » Last » Search these comments
patrick.net
An Antidote to Corporate Media
1,235,198 comments by 14,772 users - stereotomy online now