1
0

Another glimmer of self-realization by liberals: the horror of Title IX kangaroo courts actually discussed by feminists


 invite response                
2019 Sep 25, 12:32am   618 views  1 comment

by Patrick   ➕follow (59)   💰tip   ignore  

https://www.tabletmag.com/jewish-arts-and-culture/291105/americas-new-sex-bureaucracy

Four feminist law professors at Harvard Law School have been telling some alarming truths about the tribunals that have been adjudicating collegiate sex for the past five years. Campus Title IX tribunals are “so unfair as to be truly shocking,” Janet Halley, Jeannie Suk Gersen, Elizabeth Bartholet, and Nancy Gertner proclaimed in a jointly authored document titled “Fairness for All Students.” That document followed up on a previous open letter signed by 28 members of the Harvard Law School faculty in 2014 arguing that the updated sexual assault policy recently installed at Harvard was “inconsistent with some of the most basic principles we teach” and “would do more harm than good.” ...

Title IX activists, including those operating within the Office of Civil Rights in the Department of Education—from whence they issued a letter in 2011 threatening to cut off federal funds from universities who did not get tough on sexual assault—have put in place a system in which it is “commonplace to deny accused students access to the complaint, the evidence, the identities of the witnesses, or the investigative report, and to forbid them from questioning complainants or witnesses,” ...


Maybe there is a hope of return to the rule of law rather than rule by feminist lynch mobs.

Probably not though. Feminists necessarily lack the ability to distinguish right from wrong because their ideology demands that they suppress critical thought and always believe women no matter how inconsistent or implausible their stories.

Comments 1 - 1 of 1        Search these comments

1   georgeliberte   2019 Sep 25, 10:05am  

The summation, "The story, I will argue in this and subsequent columns, is about the rise and bid for hegemony of a new ideology. This ideology is a successor to liberalism. It brandishes terms that superficially resemble normative liberalism—terms like diversity and inclusion—but in fact seeks to supplant it. This new regime, in which administrative power has been fashioned into a blunt instrument of deterrence, marks off a crucial distinction—between the liberal rule of law, and the punitive system of surveillance rooted in identity politics known as “social justice.”" pretty much describes the horror that “social justice.” actually is.

Please register to comment:

api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   random   suggestions   gaiste