Comments 1 - 17 of 17 Search these comments
However it is true that 97% of scientist that believe in catastrophic man-made global warming also believe in climate change. The other 3% are idiots.
Have you ever seen a debate between climate scientists
WillPowers saysHave you ever seen a debate between climate scientists
Yes. Michael Mann got his butt kicked.
However it is true that 97% of scientist that believe in catastrophic man-made global warming also believe in climate change. The other 3% are idiots.
Who was he debating and do you mean the film director, Michael Mann?
Yes, there are notable and very interesting debates on Youtube between the major players like Patrick Moore, Judith Curry and Dr Mann. For those who don't know, Michael Mann recently lost a lawsuit he initiated because he will not share data in his defamation suits, which would prove the climategate allegations of scientific fraud.
To clarify, Michael Moore is a film director, Dr Michael Mann is the famous "hockey stick" scientist who correlated tree rings with CO2 levels and temperature. He is the subject of the "trick to hide the decline" email which referred to substituting actual temperatures at a convenient point to hide the projected temperature decline indicated by the tree rings.
Thanks Malcolm.
Can anyone name the top climate scientist that believes man made co2 will cause catastrophic climate change?
I am a firm believer in climate change
How is this a personal attack? An attack on Jesus? Or capitalism? Why would scientists make this stuff up? And why are you ignoring evidence that the climate is changing?
Stalin — who set the template for airbrushing inconvenient people out of history — would no doubt have heartily approved of this wanton act of censorship.
But what would probably have pleased him more is the magnificently twisted justification offered by the editor responsible.
“The result was delete. This is because I see a consensus here that there is no value in having a list that combines the qualities of a) being a scientist, in the general sense of that word, and b) disagreeing with the scientific consensus on global warming.”
What this Wikipedia editor is saying, in other words, is that if you’re a scientist who doesn’t believe in global warming then that automatically makes you not a scientist.
In fact many tens of thousands of scientists are sceptical of catastrophic man-made global warming theory, including some of the most eminent experts in the field, among them physicists Dr Richard Lindzen of MIT and Dr Will Happer of Princeton.
SEE: https://www.breitbart.com/europe/2020/03/08/delingpole-wikipedia-airbrushes-list-of-climate-sceptical-scientists-out-of-history/