« First « Previous Comments 39 - 78 of 98 Next » Last » Search these comments
Yet, Thailand was never a colony of either ancient India,.
election2020 saysAzad was patriotic Bharti and nothing to do with Persian reject cult of Hindooo sent to destroy Bharat.
Just read the history of Hindoooo cult RSS to find how much respect they have for national flag for which Azad sacrificed his life.
Dont be a McSikhi. RSS saved many sikhs in Delhi riots and really respect the Gurus. They do not respect Indian flag but what about the khalisthani bastards did on Jan 26th.
Also economy in India is bad everyone knows about it. But stop leftist propaganda of only few are able to eat and others aren't. I have family too and they are saying businesses were booming before covid.
election2020 saysHere is what Mughal emperors did to sikhs for conversion.
https://www.sikhnet.com/news/islamic-india-biggest-holocaust-world-history
The most important butcher in your article is Timur.
He was a Turkic/Mongolian barbarian, who adopted the 'Sword of Islam' but then, tried to adopt Persian court customs to make his barbarian kingdom look like some civilized nation-state when it was a piece of garbage which wiped out Zoroastrianism, Buddhism, and Hinduism all over the place. If anything, the reason why we don't see any remaining Buddhist or Zo shrines in Central Asia outside of archaeological ruins is because of Timur.
Why do you keep harping about "Colony". Where did I say SE Asia was a colony of India? That is a white man's narrative it has to be colony to be culturally same. I was saying they have similar or same culture.
http://sikhsangat.org/2015/brutality-of-isis-is-the-copy-of-what-mughals-did-with-sikhs-of-punjab/
I don't know history or interest in Mughal background.. But Aurangzeb was worst butcher for Sikhs.
election2020 sayshttp://sikhsangat.org/2015/brutality-of-isis-is-the-copy-of-what-mughals-did-with-sikhs-of-punjab/
I don't know history or interest in Mughal background.. But Aurangzeb was worst butcher for Sikhs.
Well ... considering that it's the same scumbag lineage, the apple doesn't fall too far from the tree.
So the idea that some Indian influences arrived in and around the Straits of Malacca, isn't a big surprise given the fact that that's the nexus between the Indian Ocean and the greater Pacific basin. But do the Thai ppl see India as the progenitor of their culture or even the 'Aegis' of it? I think not and many Thais would agree with me despite having some respect for Asoke and using names like Rama from the Ramayana..
Rin sayselection2020 sayshttp://sikhsangat.org/2015/brutality-of-isis-is-the-copy-of-what-mughals-did-with-sikhs-of-punjab/
I don't know history or interest in Mughal background.. But Aurangzeb was worst butcher for Sikhs.
Well ... considering that it's the same scumbag lineage, the apple doesn't fall too far from the tree.
It will burst his myth that Sikhs were the sole saviors of Indian sub-continent. That is the reason he thinks aurangzeb is the only evil person.
Politically USA and Canada are separate but Culturally they are same difference.
Now the truth.
very similar to DNC propaganda, calling all republicans domestic terrorists.
very similar to DNC propaganda, calling all republicans domestic terrorists.
@indc
https://www.amren.com/features/2021/01/are-we-all-domestic-terrorists/
People are waking up to "Dirty Hindoo cult" of discrimination and oppression.
election2020 saysPeople are waking up to "Dirty Hindoo cult" of discrimination and oppression.
Not from any clumsy stupid efforts you are making.
richwicks sayselection2020 saysPeople are waking up to "Dirty Hindoo cult" of discrimination and oppression.
Not from any clumsy stupid efforts you are making.
You think people have no brains
Punjab is only "Riot" free in India due to Sikhs, Otherwise this Riot cult hasn't spared any state.
election2020 saysPunjab is only "Riot" free in India due to Sikhs, Otherwise this Riot cult hasn't spared any state.
This fits the observations of my Assamese friends who'd said that since Indira Gandhi, their former home state was a warzone under Martial Law.
And thus, it aligns with the narrative that during the Mohgul Empire, Assam was an independent nation-state doing well on its own with no clerics banging on its doors.
And finally, under the British Raj, they also managed as 'semi-independent' as the Empire provided protection but when the British left, all hell broke loose and their former nation-state was never the same.
Rin sayselection2020 saysPunjab is only "Riot" free in India due to Sikhs, Otherwise this Riot cult hasn't spared any state.
This fits the observations of my Assamese friends who'd said that since Indira Gandhi, their former home state was a warzone under Martial Law.
And thus, it aligns with the narrative that during the Mohgul Empire, Assam was an independent nation-state doing well on its own with no clerics banging on its doors.
And finally, under the British Raj, they also managed as 'semi-independent' as the Empire provided protection but when the British left, all hell broke loose and their former nation-state was never the same.
It is a pity that even British colonists were better than self described natives called "Hindooo tyrants".
Bharat should free itself again and erase 1000 years of slavery!
election2020 saysRin sayselection2020 saysPunjab is only "Riot" free in India due to Sikhs, Otherwise this Riot cult hasn't spared any state.
This fits the observations of my Assamese friends who'd said that since Indira Gandhi, their former home state was a warzone under Martial Law.
And thus, it aligns with the narrative that during the Mohgul Empire, Assam was an independent nation-state doing well on its own with no clerics banging on its doors.
And finally, under the British Raj, they also managed as 'semi-independent' as the Empire provided protection but when the British left, all hell broke loose and their former nation-state was never the same.
It is a pity that even British colonists were better than self desc...
So do Sikhs.
They won hard battles to establish Sikh empire. Hindooo just got things on platter without any sacrifice from British for serving WW2 needs.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sikh_Empire
Ideally i don't want Sikhs to leave Bharat but reform it in colors of Khalsa and provide equality and opportunity to all.
Without Sikhs the Hindooo will totally decimate the Bharat poor people as nobody to resist.
So should Assam, along with Burma (plus Malaysia, since it's an addendum to the British Asian dominions), be independent nations, away from mainland India?
I mean Assam has a case. It was never under the rule of Babur, Akbar, etc. There's no reason for it to be a part of India today.
« First « Previous Comments 39 - 78 of 98 Next » Last » Search these comments
Muslim misfits and other voilent anti-freedom invaders enslaved Bhartis and termed them Hindoo, Which means slave/thief in persian/arabic.
They were forced to call themselves Hindoo to take away their dignity.
Top traitor Hindoo made Bhartis vegetarian and superstitious at behest of pesian overloads and forced to take humiliation/cowardice of worshiping cow instead of tiger as they did before.
Khalsa was born to fight against oppression and eventually won against the Hindooo and western oppression.
In current situation hindooo are trying to also suppress Khalsa so that they can sell Bharat to globalists and CCP.
Khalsa is resisting peacefully and as needed with force, they are trying to use military against Khalsa by creating violence is their name to tag them terrorists.
Hindooo=Curse of Bharat. A discriminating cult of cowards serving their masters outside of country.