by Heraclitusstudent ➕follow (8) 💰tip ignore
« First « Previous Comments 2,339 - 2,378 of 3,363 Next » Last » Search these comments
OK @Tenpoundbass how do I get involved in this?
https://www.dailyveracity.com/2021/04/16/medical-examiner-the-covid-death-number-is-a-lie
The Grand County, Colorado coroner is recently called attention to the way the state health department is classifying some deaths.
The coroner, Brenda Bock, says two of their five deaths related to COVID-19 were people who died of gunshot wounds.
“these two people had tested positive for COVID but that’s not what killed them,” she said. “The gunshot wound killed them.”
Bock said it’s simple in this case – the gunshot wound was the cause of death.
“I realize yes, you’re trying to keep count of the numbers, but you need to do it right, and these people did not die of COVID, they died of gunshot wounds and that’s how it needs to be listed,” she said.
The study also concludes that the CDC “illegally enacted new rules that violated federal law, which resulted in a 1,600% inflation of current COVID-19 fatality totals.”
“these two people had tested positive for COVID but that’s not what killed them,” she said. “The gunshot wound killed them.”
Since the beginning of the pandemic, Big Tech platforms, including Facebook, have used information from the WHO, which is often favorable to China, and fact-checkers, such as Politifact, to censor COVID-19 content on their platforms.
The WHO claimed to have conducted investigations that concluded that the virus did not escape from the Wuhan Institute of Virology. As a result, anyone who dared link the disease’s origins to Wuhan or China was silenced and punished by Big Tech platforms.
The virus allegedly broke out in the same town as the secretive lab in Wuhan. Yet, the WHO insists that the virus did not originate from the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV). Instead they said that it must have originated from a yet-to-be identified intermediary between bats and humans. Fact-checkers went with WHO’s narrative, and flagged any content on social media platforms that dared suggest a link between the origin of the virus to Wuhan or China.
One of Facebook’s fact-checkers might have had a conflict of interest with the issue, as they worked at the lab in Wuhan.
Additionally, EcoHealth Alliance, an NGO funded by US’s top epidemiologist Dr. Anthony Fauci, was working at the lab at the time. So, it was not only China who would have preferred to kill stories linking the origins of the virus to WIV.
Last September, Politifact, one of Facebook’s fact-checkers, blasted Tucker Carlson for interviewing a guest who said COVID-19 was created in a lab, in an article on their website. The headline of the article read:
“Tucker Carlson guest airs debunked conspiracy theory that COVID-19 was created in a lab.”
On May 17, the fact-checker silently walked back on their bold statement that the link between the virus and the Wuhan lab was a debunked conspiracy theory. Politifact archived the “fact-check, and wrote:
“When this fact check was first published in September 2020, PolitiFact’s sources concluded researchers who asserted the SARS-CoV-2 virus could not have been manipulated. That assertion is now more widely disputed.”
While some may argue that Politifact is being responsible and holding itself accountable, it is worth noting that while they debunked the obvious origin of the virus as a conspiracy theory, there were multiple experts who were saying otherwise.
Patrick saysOK @Tenpoundbass how do I get involved in this?
@Patrick
Start here
https://www.sfgop.org/district-maps.html
Find out who your Supervisors are in your district.
https://www.sfgop.org/uploads/5/1/8/0/51801251/2012_sf_supervisorial_lines.pdf
Here's the join to be a precinct captain link, but it's just an email link.
https://www.sfgop.org/volunteer.html
Start getting familiar with your local GOP find out if they are self interested RINOs or really trying but are out numbered by RINOs and out gunned by Democrats.
You have network of San Francisco Patnette...
Members of the Committee have a duty of loyalty to the Republican Party and to elected Republican Candidates. Committee Members will refrain from public displays of openly calling for the removal, censure, impeachment or recall of any elected Republican official.
I'm already running into things I can't agree with, like this:Members of the Committee have a duty of loyalty to the Republican Party and to elected Republican Candidates. Committee Members will refrain from public displays of openly calling for the removal, censure, impeachment or recall of any elected Republican official.
https://www.smgop.org/bylaws#Discipline%20of%20Members
What if they are whorish RINOs? Then I definitely want to call for their removal, censure, impeachment or recall immediately.
Good point.
Why aren't the deaths of people who took the "vaccine" all counted as "vaccine" deaths?
That is through becoming a Precinct committeeperson .
Tenpoundbass saysThat is through becoming a Precinct committeeperson .
How can I find out 1) what precinct I'm in and who the committee person is?
WineHorror1 saysTenpoundbass saysThat is through becoming a Precinct committeeperson .
How can I find out 1) what precinct I'm in and who the committee person is?
@WineHorror1 Google your county GOP or Republican party. Find the Join the GOP link. If you have trouble shoot me a message I'll help you out.
« First « Previous Comments 2,339 - 2,378 of 3,363 Next » Last » Search these comments
patrick.net
An Antidote to Corporate Media
1,249,207 comments by 14,896 users - askmeaboutthesaltporkcure, Ceffer, WookieMan online now