patrick.net

zzyzzx says

No problem. Fauci has a handful of HIV drug patents as well.

Patrick says

A single state has recorded 18 cases of myocarditis in people who received a COVID-19 vaccine. All of the cases in Connecticut required hospitalization.

Just be aware that a state the size of Connecticut will see around a case of myocarditis every day.

WILLIAM SHAKESPEARE, THE FIRST MAN IN THE WORLD TO GET THE COVID-19 VACCINE, DIES

Alas, poor Bill, he was going to die anyway.

EBGuy says

Patrick says

A single state has recorded 18 cases of myocarditis in people who received a COVID-19 vaccine. All of the cases in Connecticut required hospitalization.

Just be aware that a state the size of Connecticut will see around a case of myocarditis every day.

.... but zero flu cases for entire year.

With this unusually dangerous vax they push so hard, plus the twisted logic they use for masks and distancing despite all the real world evidence showing that those aren't working, I'm going to start referring to what they're following as:

Syience and phacts.

Because it sure as hell isn't science and facts.

https://news.yahoo.com/south-sudan-return-72-000-164251960.html

South Sudan to return 72,000 Covid vaccines because nobody wants it

zzyzzx says

Wait, wasn't the gubmint supposed to step in and compensate the victims for their vaxx-related misfortunes?

zzyzzx says

https://news.yahoo.com/south-sudan-return-72-000-164251960.html

South Sudan to return 72,000 Covid vaccines because nobody wants it

Nobody "wants" it either way. Some are brainwashed they should get the vaccine for something that mathematically won't kill them unless they're morbidly obese or close to death.

I also think the numbers of vaccinated are grossly over inflated. Same as the deaths from covid. The idea that we "identified" patient 0 here in Washington is laughable. But people eat this shit up. Hollywood has taken control of media seemingly. We can somehow identify 1 person out of 7B worldwide that brought the spread here. It's a fucking joke. That's a near impossibility.

zzyzzx says

Where's the source for this? The US data looks correct - is it so for the other countries?

DISCUSSION OF THE COVID SHOTS AS BIOWEAPONS

VAERS has reported over 4,000 deaths directly related to the jab. It is estimated that only 1 to 10% of actual deaths caused by the experimental biologic agent are reported. Heart attack, stroke, embolism, and other maladies caused by the jab are being attributed to natural causes. "They would have died anyway".

COVID-19 Report: Breastfeeding Baby Dies After Mother Receives Pfizer Vaccine
In a recent report submitted by a doctor to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and FDA’s Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), a five-month-old baby developed symptoms and passed away within days of breastfeeding from a mother who had just received the second dose of Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine (1166062).
https://www.visiontimes.com/2021/04/30/covid-19-report-breastfeeding-baby-dies-after-mother-receives-pfizer-vaccine.html

“There’s no theoretical reason to believe these vaccines would be harmful,” Dr. Richard Beigi, who sits on the Immunization, Infectious Disease, and Public Health Preparedness Expert Work Group of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, told CNN in a Q&A on the subject.
https://kyma.com/dsw-living/health/2021/05/11/covid-vaccines-do-not-harm-placenta-contrary-to-social-media-misinformation-study-finds/

No theoretical reason to believe that spike proteins could cause harm, none!

Except maybe the pokey parts.

18-YEAR-OLD WITH MYOCARDITIS HEART ISSUES AFTER 2ND PFIZER VACCINE SHOT

Inflammation of the heart

He was going to have heart problems anyway.

obviously

These piss poor protoplasm useless eaters should be grateful that the Great Socialist Paradise has sacrificed them for the common good.

After all, sacrificing a bunch of useless eaters to save one worthy life is heroic.

Onvacation says

18-YEAR-OLD WITH MYOCARDITIS HEART ISSUES AFTER 2ND PFIZER VACCINE SHOT

Looks like he's got a mask on even outdoors, fogging up his glasses.

The vaccine may be an agent of natural selection in this case, weeding out imbeciles.

https://reclaimthenet.org/facebook-whistleblowers-reveal-undisclosed-filter-for-liberty-based/

Project Veritas has continued to publish documents from the latest batch of leaks obtained from Facebook whistleblowers, that detail the way the giant is suppressing comments skeptical of coronavirus vaccines.

According to the leaked documents, Facebook has developed a finely-grained definition of moderation and censorship of dissenting opinions expressed on this topic in the comments, where “vaccine hesitancy” is suppressed through demotion, while comments are also divided into a total of five tiers.

Of course of course.

Zuckerberg was rightly skeptical of genetic manipulation for profit, and suggested his own employees not get the jab until someone whispered something in his ear...

Paying people to get the jab not working in Hong Kong. Excess"vaccine" to be thrown out.

https://web.archive.org/web/20210526231213/https://amp.news.com.au/world/coronavirus/global/country-that-cant-pay-people-to-get-the-jab/news-story/8cf38a8ecb99ece9c0e7436b1e687b4e

The Chinese tend to be a bit smarter than most white people.

WineHorror1 says

Patrick says

The Chinese tend to be a bit smarter than most white people.

I think the Chinese are much more likely to realize their government is corrupt and should not do what they say, if possible.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33113270/

Aims of the study: Patient comprehension is a critical part of meeting medical ethics standards of informed consent in study designs. The aim of the study was to determine if sufficient literature exists to require clinicians to disclose the specific risk that COVID-19 vaccines could worsen disease upon exposure to challenge or circulating virus.

Methods used to conduct the study: Published literature was reviewed to identify preclinical and clinical evidence that COVID-19 vaccines could worsen disease upon exposure to challenge or circulating virus. Clinical trial protocols for COVID-19 vaccines were reviewed to determine if risks were properly disclosed.

Results of the study: COVID-19 vaccines designed to elicit neutralising antibodies may sensitise vaccine recipients to more severe disease than if they were not vaccinated. Vaccines for SARS, MERS and RSV have never been approved, and the data generated in the development and testing of these vaccines suggest a serious mechanistic concern: that vaccines designed empirically using the traditional approach (consisting of the unmodified or minimally modified coronavirus viral spike to elicit neutralising antibodies), be they composed of protein, viral vector, DNA or RNA and irrespective of delivery method, may worsen COVID-19 disease via antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE). This risk is sufficiently obscured in clinical trial protocols and consent forms for ongoing COVID-19 vaccine trials that adequate patient comprehension of this risk is unlikely to occur, obviating truly informed consent by subjects in these trials.

Conclusions drawn from the study and clinical implications: The specific and significant COVID-19 risk of ADE should have been and should be prominently and independently disclosed to research subjects currently in vaccine trials, as well as those being recruited for the trials and future patients after vaccine approval, in order to meet the medical ethics standard of patient comprehension for informed consent.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22536382/

Background: Severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) emerged in China in 2002 and spread to other countries before brought under control. Because of a concern for reemergence or a deliberate release of the SARS coronavirus, vaccine development was initiated. Evaluations of an inactivated whole virus vaccine in ferrets and nonhuman primates and a virus-like-particle vaccine in mice induced protection against infection but challenged animals exhibited an immunopathologic-type lung disease.

Conclusions: These SARS-CoV vaccines all induced antibody and protection against infection with SARS-CoV. However, challenge of mice given any of the vaccines led to occurrence of Th2-type immunopathology suggesting hypersensitivity to SARS-CoV components was induced. Caution in proceeding to application of a SARS-CoV vaccine in humans is indicated.

WineHorror1 says

I think the Chinese are much more likely to realize their government is corrupt and should not do what they say, if possible.

Those Africans who jumped off the balcony or into the river to avoid the mandatory jab aren't stupid either.

porkchopexpress says

This risk is sufficiently obscured in clinical trial protocols and consent forms for ongoing COVID-19 vaccine trials that adequate patient comprehension of this risk is unlikely to occur, obviating truly informed consent by subjects in these trials.

By design.

https://freewestmedia.com/2021/05/26/new-pfizer-study-four-fifths-of-all-vaccinated-children-aged-12-and-over-complain-of-side-effects/

ENJOY YOUR JAB!!!

"DRAPER, Utah (ABC4) – The day after his COVID-19 vaccine shot, 17-year-old Everest Romney felt his neck swelling. In the coming days, he suffered from severe headaches.

His mother, who tells ABC4 the pediatrician initially dismissed the symptoms as a pulled neck muscle, says she was convinced it was something else.

“He could not move his neck without the assistance of his hands,” says mother Cherie Romney."

https://www.abc4.com/news/local-news/draper-teenager-hospitalized-with-blood-clots-after-covid-19-vaccine-shot/

This was Pfizer :)

zzyzzx says

They'll be the first out of business.

RAND PAUL - I AM NOT GETTING "VACCINATED"

"Are they going to tell me I can't have a cheeseburger for lunch"

FRENCH AMBULANCE MAN AND NURSES ALERT MASSIVE INCREASE IN DEATHS FOLLOWING THE SHOT

VAXXX DEATHS ARE THE PANDEMIC

Fear porn. You can tell by the music.

zzyzzx says

zzyzzx says

Why? What's the point? They don't have separate sections for "vaccinated against chickenpox", do they? Why this time it's different?

And whom is this supposed to "protect": vaxxed, unvaxxed, a random bat flying by?

Eric Holder says

Why? What's the point? They don't have separate sections for "vaccinated against chickenpox", do they? Why this time it's different?

And whom is this supposed to "protect": vaxxed, unvaxxed, a random bat flying by?

Are you talking about common sense, justice and human rights again? How old fashioned.