« First « Previous Comments 1,938 - 1,977 of 5,716 Next » Last » Search these comments
porkchopexpress saysWhy not? They didn't come to these conclusions until after they were vaccinated. In fact, it lends more credibility because it proves they're not anti-vaxx.Darkhorse podcast with Bret Weinstein, and Dr. Robert Malone, the inventor of mRNA technology.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-_NNTVJzqtY&t=1680s
Steve and Robert were already fully vaccinated, but are now blowing the whistle on how these vaccines are very unsafe for humans. In a nutshell, we now know that the Spike protein, which is toxic, doesn't stay with the cell but breaks off and circulates throughout the body including the brain.
Doesn't sound credible if THEY GOT VAXXED also/anyway.
Maybe the got vaxxed before they new the facts.
Even now, most people who got the "vaccine" are in denial about the harms of the "vaccines".
Kevin
1 day ago
My father, mid 60s, non smoker, healthily individual 6 days after his second dose of Moderna passed out, broke teeth, split chin and head open. Rushed to ER. They found blood clotting in his lung. Coincidence? The doctors didn’t seem to see a link to his recent vaccination which blew my mind. Here are some blood thinners take care. I am reporting it to Vaers. Keep up the good work fellas!
tanya lea
3 days ago
The man who invented mRNA vaccine technology thinks the data on Ivermectin for COVID is 'very encouraging'. Your move, YouTube.
Patrick saysHe doesn't think there's anything wrong with mRNA technology in general, it's that these particular mRNA vaccines allow the Spike protein to flow throughout the body....that's the kicker. Because it was rushed and there were no animal trials, it's truly still in the experimental phase and they're finding shit out as they go.Maybe the got vaxxed before they new the facts.
Even now, most people who got the "vaccine" are in denial about the harms of the "vaccines".
One of them is THE INVENTOR of mRNA technology. How could he not know? Rushed?
The "vaccine" is 50 times more likely to kill children than the virus itself is.
Bureaucrats are ignoring the data while people are dying and suffering.
porkchopexpress saysBureaucrats are ignoring the data while people are dying and suffering.
The bureaucrats are all captured, only slaves to industry now. Slaves to the very industries they are supposed to be regulating.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Regulatory_capture
This long talk has some discussion about how regulatory capture led us into this hell: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-_NNTVJzqtY
Martin Armstrong just wrote a pretty good article https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/future-forecasts/ecm/may-8th-the-turning-point-the-crack-in-confidence/
...we are ruled by the unelected.
Let's ignore the fact that most of the vaers reports of people who might have died of the vax were also very old and sick.
Oh but what about the woman who turned magnetic from the vax? So magnetic, she could even attract non-magnetic coins.
If you do a search for news about “Isaiah Harris,” the 18-year-old from Arkansas does not pop up. Nobody in the media is talking about him because he doesn’t fit their narrative. Harris received the Pfizer Covid-19 vaccines that mainstream media has been instructed to claim are safe. Harris had a heart attack two days after receiving the second shot and was diagnosed with Myocarditis.
Clearly, the system for placing existing drugs on the list of NIH treatment protocols needs to change. As Weinstein asserted, “There is a safe prophylactic against COVID, and we aren’t using it because repurposed drugs are unprofitable and experimental treatments with EUAs are.” Given the price of remdesivir, this seems obvious. Perhaps a minimum number of random control trials of a repurposed generic showing benefit should mandate that the medication or combination be placed on the NIH treatment protocol. If remdesivir could earn an EUA with one garbage study, safe and effective repurposed drugs should not require very many.
Weinstein called the failure of the FDA and NIH to authorize these drugs for the treatment protocols “the “crime of the century.” Doctors advocating for early outpatient treatment estimate that these protocols could have prevented between 50-75% of deaths from COVID-19. Looking at the meta-analyses, this could well be the case. The part that should enrage everyone who lost a loved one or is suffering from long-haul symptoms is that no one will be held accountable. That is also something that must change.
Nurse: Houston Hospital Instructs Employees NOT To List Vaccine Adverse Reactions
New term: "cum cow".
Airlines planning to ban vaccinated people due to high altitude blood clots?
Peru is definitely not a poster child for Ivermectin. First of all overall their death rate is the worst in the world by far.Can't attack the message so you attack the source? Your response lacks substance but in fact, you made my point for me...correct, Peru is NOT the poster child for Ivermectin ANYMORE. When Peru implemented Ivermectin, deaths dropped significantly. When the new President got elected and started restricting its use, deaths skyrocketed. Here's the data:
Secondly, you're getting deceptive graphs from a deceptive site.
Don't believe it? Lima has 10 million people, compared to Arequipa & Cusco 1 million and 0.5 million respectively. Why don't you try visualizing how bad total deaths were outside of Lima when accounting for population?
Fauci wants to make kids wear masks until they can vaccinate ALL school children.
Just a BS association. Peru followed the same pattern as any number of the other states and countries.lol ok, except you posted # of cases in Florida, not deaths which is in the Peru graph. Speaking of BS associations haha
ThreeBays saysJust a BS association. Peru followed the same pattern as any number of the other states and countries.lol ok, except you posted # of cases in Florida, not deaths which is in the Peru graph. Speaking of BS associations haha
Therapeutic Advances:
A large majority of randomized and observational controlled trials of ivermectin are reporting repeated, large magnitude improvements in clinical outcomes. Numerous prophylaxis trials demonstrate that regular ivermectin use leads to large reductions in transmission. Multiple, large “natural experiments” occurred in regions that initiated “ivermectin distribution” campaigns followed by tight, reproducible, temporally associated decreases in case counts and case fatality rates compared with nearby regions without such campaigns.
« First « Previous Comments 1,938 - 1,977 of 5,716 Next » Last » Search these comments
I know a few and they sound like absolute shit, and both feel like absolute crap.
Anyone else?
Why the fuck are people injecting themselves with a non-FDA approved biological agent?
And what the fuck are people afraid of, when this covid has a 99.97% survival rate?
I don't understand this level of retardedness... Or maybe I am just super, over the top, fucking retarded, that I can't understand this shit.