Comments 1 - 40 of 80 Next » Last » Search these comments
FDA will approve whatever the Deep State says to fucking approve.
https://www.fda.gov/vaccines-blood-biologics/vaccines/emergency-use-authorization-vaccines-explained
Yes they are. Just not fully approved.
I saw this on 4chan a few days ago. Has some links to some white papers.
research that has already gone into nano-particles
nano-garbage is used only to extract money from granting agencies, almost no practical applications as of now.
Another worst-case scenario:
Maybe the graphene or whatever makes the shot magnetic can cause blood clots on demand by exposing targeted people to some intense radio waves.
So various people could be caused to drop dead whenever the Pfizer/government complex wants to get rid of them.
Just sayin it may be possible.
nano-garbage is used only to extract money from granting agencies, almost no practical applications as of now.
Latest release from Project Veritas about Pfizer:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FUXGB5FzhPc
So why did one of the leading researchers suddenly have IRS problems right around the start of the plandemic, then just disappear?
porkchopexpress saysYesLatest release from Project Veritas about Pfizer:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FUXGB5FzhPc
Is that the same as this?
https://rumble.com/vnf0n5-pfizer-whistleblower-leaks-execs-emails-exposing-suppression-of-covid-vax-i.html
diamond does not have multiple C-C bonds
not that it matters, all carbons in diamond are sp3-hybridized, but in graphite/graphene sp2-hybridized
what is the name and affiliation of the researcher? I can check on this
But maybe you have a better explanation for why graphene oxide is in these shots, that has nothing to do with implanting wires and transistors, despite that being a perfect application of graphene oxide, 5g, and The Shot. Maybe you just believe in a LOT of coincidences..?
But maybe you have a better explanation for why graphene oxide is in these shots, that has nothing to do with implanting wires and transistors, despite that being a perfect application of graphene oxide, 5g, and The Shot. Maybe you just believe in a LOT of coincidences..?
Here's my explanation ... laziness, idiocy, and looking for a quick fix.Rin says
A quick fix for what? The quick part is contradicted by the numerous patents around covid going back to the turn of the century, and to the DARPA funded of Moderna MRNA research around 2013. The fix part stands is contradicted by everything that's happening from a health perspective, but maybe you think it's to "fix" something unrelated to health? And in this case what would you propose?
Therefore, the mRNA vax needs ways of shielding against this as well as being able to slide around the body at will. First the phospholipid and cholesterol wrapping makes the mRNA look like 'food stuff', then the graphene oxide coating, allows it to move from the shoulder injection point and into anywhere else in the body, without resistance as the carbon lattice protects it from all the body's defenses (as well as the general kinetics of degradation during mass transport) until the mRNA arrives at let's say the Spleen, the Pancreas, the Liver, the Heart, you name it.
I don't see any reason for putting graphene oxide in vaccines.
The probability is that this is a fill/finish problem due to machines not being properly adjusted.
If they are untrue, that gives arguments to vaccine mandate supporters.
Bd6r saysThe probability is that this is a fill/finish problem due to machines not being properly adjusted.
Causing the contents of the shot to be almost entirely graphene oxide? And that not being intentional!?
So consent is only relevant as long as everyone tells the truth? The minute one person tells one lie, you now have the right to line 'em up and inject 'em?
Causing the contents of the shot to be almost entirely graphene oxide? And that not being intentional!?
So from the above, it sounds like your both saying because you don't want to believe in a larger plan at work here, that's your sole reason for rejecting bio-digital convergence, despite the plethora of government sponsored documentation praising it's potential uses and benefits. Well, I don't want to believe it either, but just because it makes me uncomfortable, doesn't mean I'm going to stop my ears, close my eyes, and pray it all starts making sense soon.
I would invite you to be a little uncomfortable, dig a little deeper into the many connections that point towards this being very planned, very intentional, and very much your future if you don't face it and fight back.
This is exactly what it's NOT supposed to do. It's supposed to remain in the arm. This is the main cause of damage to the body(the fact that it moves). Again, not seeing a lot of evidence contradicting what I'm saying.
Just as bad, but as Rin says above result of incompetence and laziness.
So thus, it's conceivable that w/o the wrapper of Graphene Oxide, that there's little chance of a critical mass of mRNA fragments surviving (as in the billions), to pull off the heist of taking over ribosomal complexes in mass across multiple organ systems.
Would you believe 85 percent graphene oxide?
Comments 1 - 40 of 80 Next » Last » Search these comments
https://everydayconcerned.net/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/MICROSCOPIA_DE_VIAL_CORMINATY_DR_CAMPRA_FIRMA_E_1_HORIZONTAL.pdf
The FDA knows graphene oxide is toxic, and will not approve it for human consumption:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graphite_oxide