patrick.net

everybody knows mathematically that is the reason we don't bother without subsidies. Then again, math is racist, so there's that.

You're not going to convince the majority of people. They're sponges and soak up all the bull shit. Green energy is just as harmful as any energy if the goal is to reduce carbon emissions.

We have a world with 7B people. Every country has vehicles and generally an electric system. We've doubled population in 50-60 year (too lazy to look up). Florida wasn't supposed to exist right now. Sea levels haven't gone up. Smog and pollution is down, but that likely has more to do with auto emissions being reduced and fuel mixture.

I want to hear more in the press about the benefits of increased CO2:

- more vigorous plant life everywhere on earth, since they love CO2
- longer growing season, especially in northern countries
- more habitable land
- lower heating costs in winter
- shipping through the Northwest Passage

Others?

Patrick says

I want to hear more in the press about the benefits of increased CO2:

- more vigorous plant life everywhere on earth, since they love CO2
- longer growing season, especially in northern countries
- more habitable land
- lower heating costs in winter
- shipping through the Northwest Passage

Others?

A new warming period would benefit Northern Europe, Russia, Canada, and Alaska. The "White" areas. Thus, only anti-White racists would be against it.

Yup or why is it getting more green with more CO2 https://www.nasa.gov/feature/goddard/2016/carbon-dioxide-fertilization-greening-earth

The tree-huggers best be advised to consider the minimum level of C02 that is necessary for plant survival - somewhere between 150 - 200 ppm, which was nearly breached in the pre-industrial era during the mini ice age.

I'm starting to believe now that the plutocrat-controlled agenda is world depopulation. If we decrease C02 to minimal levels for plant survival, then massive famines will necessarily occur, both from insufficient C02, and the resulting cooler temperatures having a devastating synergistic effect on plant growth.

This is the single best explanation of climate change that I have come across. This guy is a paleoclimatologist, and the video link (sorry - it's bad-tube) is well worth watching:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yze1YAz_LYM

NuttBoxer says

Until people stop looking at made up stats, and start looking at the entire process, I would say it's very safe to assume any green initiative is causing more harm than good to the world around us.

You want to have a mindfuck?

You're totally incorrect. The increase in CO2 in the atmosphere is a boon to plants. The more carbon dioxide that is created, the better.

mich says

Yup or why is it getting more green with more CO2 https://www.nasa.gov/feature/goddard/2016/carbon-dioxide-fertilization-greening-earth

Very cool. Most areas of earth are getting greener.

stereotomy says

I'm starting to believe now that the plutocrat-controlled agenda is world depopulation. If we decrease C02 to minimal levels for plant survival, then massive famines will necessarily occur, both from insufficient C02, and the resulting cooler temperatures having a devastating synergistic effect on plant growth.

There will still be "food" available. GMO, grown in labs, and only available to those who are up to date on their mind-control shot... err vaccines.

richwicks says

You're totally incorrect. The increase in CO2 in the atmosphere is a boon to plants. The more carbon dioxide that is created, the better.

I've always wondered what the plants are supposed to survive on if we take all their air away...

NuttBoxer says

richwicks says

You're totally incorrect. The increase in CO2 in the atmosphere is a boon to plants. The more carbon dioxide that is created, the better.

I've always wondered what the plants are supposed to survive on if we take all their air away...

They have no intention of reducing CO2 emissions - it's basically a way to get people go without, as they move manufacturing offshore. It's a big scam to make people feel bad that they simply exist. Kids are tortured by this shit.

Kind of ruins your view on life when you think your existence is just helping to kill the entire planet.

When I was a kid, it was common belief of kids my age that it would be a nuclear wasteland by the time we were 40. We were constantly bombarded with the idea that the future == doom. Logan's Run was like that (the film and the movie), there's an episode in Space 1999 where Earth is able to contact the base after a ton of time dilations - the entire planet earth was laid waste, nature was entirely destroyed, and people of the future lived in giant enclosed cities. Blade Runner was set in 2019 - where the Earth was swimming with pollution.

All of them projected doom. It's no different today, I'm certain.

richwicks says

They have no intention of reducing CO2 emissions - it's basically a way to get people go without, as they move manufacturing offshore. It's a big scam to make people feel bad that they simply exist. Kids are tortured by this shit.

If you read Griffin, it's part of a planned transition to 3rd world status. You can't get people to accept a one world government if their lives are good. Shut down coal, shut down nuclear, tell people rolling blackouts are due to them washing their clothes, and cooking food.

Patrick says

I want to hear more in the press about the benefits of increased CO2:

- more vigorous plant life everywhere on earth, since they love CO2
- longer growing season, especially in northern countries
- more habitable land
- lower heating costs in winter
- shipping through the Northwest Passage

Others?

Warm beaches in Antarctica!

Onvacation says

Warm beaches in Antarctica!

East Bay hills becoming waterfront property!