Comments 1 - 40 of 43 Next » Last » Search these comments
Al_Sharpton_for_President saysThe correct answer is: Systemic racism.
And Putin.
This is the fraud promoted by healthscare industry.
Of course there is the added hazard at the Boardwalk of what seems like innumerable hoards of incredibly obese Mexicans and their scores of 200 pound children.Hollywod says this is fine.
Fucking electric bicycles are not bicycles, they are electric motorcycles and should be in traffic, not running over cyclists on the paths.
Also, fat acceptance is disgusting. I remember gals that only had that tiny amount of roundness nowhere near an inch around the belly button that wouldn't wear a two piece feeling they were "too fat". Now I see lardass girls flopping their bellies and massive chunky asses all over. And not just older women, but younger chicks you'd think should be reasonably self-aware.
There are numerous diet frauds, but some anthems are correct. Common processed foods have been imbedded with hormone inhibitors to cause lethargy and fat. It is not just a matter of calories consumed, it's calories plus metabolic pathway manipulations.
Fast food joints seem to be the purveyors of addictive foods (human flesh?) that also fuck up the body's hormones. What, where, and how would require analysis that would likely be suppressed. Those fast food joint bust ups look so much like addict behavior on withdrawal, it's hard not to draw a comparison.
I sure wish I knew what they were specifically, except they are at least in breads, sugar products, cereals, raman soups, and the oft stated seed oils. The seeds are not toxic by themselves, but heat applied to their oils have some side effects.
The usual suspects probably have labs where they study all these interactions and incorporate them into the processed foods, particularly grain and seed pr...
No matter what you eat - and of course healthy food is preferred - if you burn more calories every day than your intake you will lose weight. This always works
No matter what you eat - and of course healthy food is preferred - if you burn more calories every day than your intake you will lose weight. This always works
mell says
No matter what you eat - and of course healthy food is preferred - if you burn more calories every day than your intake you will lose weight. This always works
It's the nature of the absorption and burning that can be distorted, and the gas jets can be turned up or down with metabolic active agents. Pathways toward accumulating fat could also be artificially induced.
Everybody could wind up thin if they had a hormonal process that increased their basal metabolic rate by a percentage. No matter what they ate, they would not overwhelm it with calories. They might even need a lot of calories just to maintain. In cold climates, more calories are better and are burned off faster to maintain body heat. Vice versa, if you had a lowered basal metabolic rate by hook or crook, you could gain excess weight even if you didn't have an excessive caloric diet.
If you ...
mell says
No matter what you eat - and of course healthy food is preferred - if you burn more calories every day than your intake you will lose weight. This always works
It's movement. We've become a sedentary population. You still may not lose weight if you do an hour workout a day intentionally. I personally think to be the fittest you can be you need to be moving 4-6 hours a day and preferably doing stuff, not working out necessarily. Working out is highly overrated and for dudes is generally is getting muscular which doesn't equate to healthy. Not bad, but everyone generally fails at the consistency and that turns into fat if you fall off the workout train.
If you're in an office see if you can get a stand up desk. Sitting is the worst, hence why people have developed sometimes $1k+ office chairs for their staff. You guys in CA have it easy weather wise. Walk the dog...
Yeah but back then only whores dress the way most women dress regularly today.
See through Yoga pants would have never been a thing when I was growing up. Because women didn't run around in their under britches.
I don't get how a woman can go out in public in yoga tights. Would they wear stockings? What's the difference?
Yet childhood obesity was pretty much at zero as we roamed outside pretty all day every day.
fat acceptance is disgusting
The average woman is now heavier than the average man was in 1960. This is in raw actual pounds, not a proportional measurement
Comments 1 - 40 of 43 Next » Last » Search these comments
BMI = 21.4
BMI Categories:
Underweight = <18.5
Normal weight = 18.5–24.9
Overweight = 25–29.9
Obesity = BMI of 30 or greater
In fact, yo'd have to get below 137 lbs. at that height to be considered underweight. So, are we becoming accustomed to viewing overweight as normal weight?
https://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/health/educational/lose_wt/BMI/bmicalc.htm?source=patrick.net