by Patrick ➕follow (59) 💰tip ignore
« First « Previous Comments 115,622 - 115,661 of 117,730 Next » Last » Search these comments
This chapter of the Doolittle Raid has largely gone unreported—until now.
The entire point of the state legislature is finding out ways to strip you of every single dime not hidden in a rubber condom shoved up your anus.
Renewable energy sources are at the center of the ongoing energy transition.
Similarly, a complete shift to low-carbon sources requires massive investments in natural resources, infrastructure, and grid storage, along with changes in our energy consumption habits.
Many eviction moratoriums have long expired.
All the climate change promoters have a great opportunity to change their habits and save the world without spending a penny. So what are they waiting for?
One side is held in place and the other side is twisted away, leaving the creme on the stationary side.
IDIOTS!
Get her on Rogan or similar.
One side is held in place and the other side is twisted away,Why do it anyway, I like the wafer as much as the cream--it's the combination that's so good.
They wasted time at MIT for this?
Poland, Lithuania, and Estonia already have a border with Russia. So the "logic" provided above is invalid.
Know why Putin annexed Crimea? Be cause otherwise he was seriously looking at a NATO naval base at Sevastopol
This only indicates that even one of our best universities ... MIT ... could possibly be overrated? Or worse, they're advertising their rheology group because much of its work is obsolete.
stereotomy saysGet her on Rogan or similar.
What cult like religious associations? All religions are cults, just depends on one's perspective. She has already been on Rogan and it was a great conversation.
Get her on Rogan or similar.
Gabbard took her oath of office as a member of Congress on the Hindu religious text
From a physics point of view, if the twisting motion is FAST enough, I think it would make a difference as to which wafer was stationary and which wasn't
My real point is that a lot of this stuff is common sense for folks who'd studied Applied Chemistry, not some revelation into the unknown properties of some junk food.
Well my point about this given that I know exactly what I want to know about Rheology and fluids - which is absolutely nothing - my point is, this "discovery" from MIT was a waste of student and/or US grant money.
« First « Previous Comments 115,622 - 115,661 of 117,730 Next » Last » Search these comments
patrick.net
An Antidote to Corporate Media
1,266,071 comments by 15,136 users - ElYorsh, Robert Sproul, WookieMan online now