patrick.net

Ceffer says

Disingenuous moments: I think it's pretty clear True The Vote were fed info from some intelligence sources. Can you say NSA or military intelligence?

Didn’t they say this is just data you can buy from commercial sources? Not that those device tracking companies don’t also get government contracts. I wonder though if it is really possible to buy such “petabytes” of detailed device tracking data. What are the legal restrictions on such a sale, data privacy laws and all?

I predict 2000 Mules will be just as successful in getting our government to prevent election fraud as VAXXED was in getting our government to keep dangerous vaccines from being distributed.

Undoctored says

Ceffer says

Disingenuous moments: I think it's pretty clear True The Vote were fed info from some intelligence sources. Can you say NSA or military intelligence?

Didn’t they say this is just data you can buy from commercial sources? Not that those device tracking companies don’t also get government contracts. I wonder though if it is really possible to buy such “petabytes” of detailed device tracking data. What are the legal restrictions on such a sale, data privacy laws and all?

There are no restrictions since you get the data without identification. They didn't have to know a single name to prove the fraud, they only correlated movements of the same phone ID with video footage which again is totally legal to show since you are in a public place approaching a public drop box. That's how every advertiser gets your data, they don't know "oh that's Joe Sixpack who is interested in product xyz, let's send him an ad", it's "this is user 1234567890abc, who is a 30-50yr old male interested in product xyz, let's send him an ad". As long as the data is "anonymized" enough so that you cannot figure out who that individual is you can buy anything given you have enough money. Of course more sensitive data such as health issues require even more randomization/anonymization and compliance with hippa etc., but the same principle applies.

AmericanKulak says

- Why does somebody have dozens of ballots? How big can their family be?

Yep. This is just the proof of what everyone knew when they woke up at 7 am to the 3am "ballot dump" which changed the election. I do agree that there have been too many allegations in all sorts of directions, occasionally razor dictates here that the ballot harvesting, trafficking and spoofing, i.e. the easiest to carry out and most difficult to prove AFTER the ballot is counted, is the one to focus on, which also explains theories dump. Sure they can prove it after thr fact with the geotracking and video footage, but it's not feasible to overturn a presidential election, so they don't care. Now they just need to attack all sane voices who argue for stringent voter laws, in person and voting with valid ID only. Jim Crow 2! Reeeeeeeee!

Patrick says

Full movie online:

https://odysee.com/2000_Mules:7ed65120eafe021024c573a19e675f7a6513fe9e?source=patrick.net

Does anyone need any more proof?

"A republic, if you can keep it." - Ben Franklin

Well, we couldn't (keep it), so we don't (have it anymore).

Hi Patrick, I think you missed OnVacation's post above. He's pointing out that the original post text mentions 2016 voter fraud, but instead should reference 2020 voter fraud.

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/05/woman-finds-box-100-mail-ballots-walking-dog-hollywood/?source=patrick.net

Also on Bitchute now:


original link
/

https://patriotpost.us/articles/88251?source=patrick.net

MAY 10, 2022
‘2000 Mules’: The Film They Don’t Want You to See
A new film makes a compelling case that the 2020 election wasn’t “the most secure election in history.”

It really doesn't even matter who all the 2000 mule ballot box stuffing votes were for, the stuffing itself invalidates the election by intent, subversion and treason.

https://genesiustimes.com/biden-denies-2000-mules-were-used-in-2020-election-fraud-says-it-was-more-like-5000/?source=patrick.net

WASHINGTON, DC—President* Joe Biden has responded to the bombshell documentary 2000 Mules, which alleges there were 2000 ballot traffickers in swing states that helped steal the 2020 election. Biden boasted that “it was more like 5000.”

“Come on man, I said that we put together the most extensive voter fraud organization in the history of the country and I meant it!” Biden said in an honest take on the subject. “Two thousand mules? That’s child’s play. You think I could get elected with just 2000 ballot traffickers?”

Patrick says

Nice try, but support for helping Ukraine to repeal Russian agression is solidly bipartisan - look up the votes in the Congress.

Did I say that only Democrats were corrupt?

Manafort was getting paid big time to lobby for Ukraine, too.

Holy shit, I finally watched 2000 Mules at

original link
/

The movie shows how https://www.truethevote.org/?source=patrick.net used phone geolocation data to prove that many thousands of "mules" each went around to an average of 25 ballot drop boxes and stuffed them for Biden in the key states, swinging the result. There is also a ton of video of these people actually stuffing in the ballots, and even stripping off their rubber gloves afterwards, and taking selfies with the ballots as proof that they did it, so that they would get paid.

https://rumble.com/v14ckqq-2000-mules-clip-vote-tally-on-election-night-with-mule-criminality.html?source=patrick.net

DooDahMan says

Fact-checking ‘2000 Mules,’ the movie alleging ballot fraud - True the Vote makes false assumptions based on phone-tracking data

https://www.mercurynews.com/2022/05/05/fact-checking-2000-mules-the-movie-alleging-ballot-fraud/?source=patrick.net

Fackten Cheka bullshit from AP. Not even bothering.

AmericanKulak says

Fackten Cheka bullshit from Doo dip shit. Not even bothering.

Fixed it for you.

AmericanKulak says

DooDahMan says

Fact-checking ‘2000 Mules,’ the movie alleging ballot fraud - True the Vote makes false assumptions based on phone-tracking data

https://www.mercurynews.com/2022/05/05/fact-checking-2000-mules-the-movie-alleging-ballot-fraud/?source=patrick.net

Fackten Cheka bullshit from AP. Not even bothering.

Lol their reasoning is so bad it's almost comical. "It can only be accurate within a few meters reeeeee! Brrrrrrr!" Sure thing those mules then just were "by accident" frequenting the area within few meters of the drop box cause they just like to hang out around ballot drop boxes! Lol! How stupid do they think their readers are. Oh wait... they may be that stupid.

https://notthebee.com/article/la-woman-finds-more-than-100-mail-in-ballots-while-walking-her-dog?source=patrick.net

You know, I might go on far left forums and claim to post this link about "How Trump stole the election in 2016", and give the link to 2000 Mules, lol!

Some of them will probably start watching it.

Eric Holder says

Nice try, but support for helping Ukraine to repeal Russian agression is solidly bipartisan - look up the votes in the Congress.

It was a bipartisan effort to steal the election.

When congress gets together and agrees on something, that's when they are getting together to really fuck us.

You're stupid in my opinion to be able to be manipulated into supporting WWIII.

richwicks says

It was a bipartisan effort to steal the election.

I prefer the word fake election. But otherwise you are correct.

Patrick says

You know, I might go on far left forums and claim to post this link about "How Trump stole the election in 2016", and give the link to 2000 Mules, lol!

Some of them will probably start watching it.

Brilliant, and don’t forget sidewalk chalk or any other way to get the word out.

Patrick says

You know, I might go on far left forums and claim to post this link about "How Trump stole the election in 2016", and give the link to 2000 Mules, lol!

Some of them will probably start watching it.

I think a group of Guy Fawkes programmers might do better learning to reverse program the Dominion machines through their wi fi portals at election time.

clambo says

I hope to see the movie sometime.

@clambo - it's all over the Internet:


original link


People have local copies everywhere. We KNOW this is going to be censored, a few thousand people have your back in this fight. Yeah, the election was stolen, it's obvious it was, and now you can see just what sort of government we have. It's really a criminal syndicate. The Republic is dead but I think in time we can bring it back. It's our duty.

richwicks says

The Republic is dead but I think in time we can bring it back.

I've been watching the "Rome" series with my wife lately. They also lost their republic, but I know that they never got it back. Kind of depressing.

https://www.rottentomatoes.com/tv/rome?source=patrick.net

Say it again, in the land of the free . . .

Patrick says

richwicks says

The Republic is dead but I think in time we can bring it back.

I've been watching the "Rome" series with my wife lately. They also lost their republic, but I know that they never got it back. Kind of depressing.

https://www.rottentomatoes.com/tv/rome?source=patrick.net

We aren't in such a time though now. Back then, it was just rumors and old wives tales, we can see the machinations of the world perhaps for the first time.

When I was a young engineering student, the concept of the Internet was to obliterate deception and democratize information. We didn't foresee companies like Google and Facebook forming to resist it, but they can't resist it. They can stave it off, but they can't stop it.

I am so much more aware of the world, and how it works beyond almost anybody was in 1950, because of this communication system. I can tell when my government is lying within days, maybe weeks, sometimes months, but I can know. How many people knew that the Gulf of Tonkin Incident was a false flag in 1985, even after Mike Gravel proved it by reading the Pentagon Papers into the congressional record 14 years prior? That was the year I was born that he did this, and I didn't know about it until my 20's.

I think we have a very good chance. I think censorship is doomed to fail, and I think that it's a sign of desperation, not of power. I remember the internet 20 and 30 years ago, you could say whatever you liked, and were just dismissed as some crackpot. Well, those crackpots are beginning to win, so they are pushed off to bitchute, rumble, their own private sites, whatever, but they can't be silenced and their message gets out and expands. It's MUCH slower than I expected, but it's happening. I can see it easily. We now have a Ministry of Truth, which is widely regarded as a Ministry of Propaganda - anything they say we can know as most likely being false. They aren't going to talk about what is true, they won't waste their time with what people regard as true, they will spend their time convincing the public that a lie is true. The only thing they will discuss, will be lies promoted by our government, and that makes lies very easy to identify.

This is desperation. If they funded it properly (and they won't) they'd mix lies with heaps of truth, that's the best way to hide a lie, but they aren't going to be well funded. They believe the public is stupid, because they equate being a moral and good person, as being a stupid person. They are semi-human. I hope to live long enough to see humanity regain control of the planet.

I am so thankful that psychology is such a fraud of a science. If they actually did the work to really investigate how people thought and worked, we'd be fucked. They are working off from a model that was created through a bunch of frauds, and I'm grateful for that. Did you know that Freud created the concept of the Electra Complex because he couldn't imagine his female patients were being raped by their fathers? His belief was that these girls imagined their rapes, because they wanted to have sex with their fathers. We are still working within that framework today. There are still Freudians. He understood sex was a primary import to the human species, but he didn't realize people could really be awful. He was a naive old man, that couldn't really dig down because of his time and his moral thinking.

richwicks says

If they funded it properly (and they won't) they'd mix lies with heaps of truth, that's the best way to hide a lie, but they aren't going to be well funded.

Really? They will get billions in funding.