« First « Previous Comments 16 - 55 of 143 Next » Last » Search these comments
Military Doctor Testifies in Court That a Superior Ordered Her Not to Discuss Data Showing Massive Spikes in Illness After Vaccine Mandate
Military Doctor Punished for Granting Exemptions to COVID Vaccine Mandate, Court Documents Reveal
Dr. Samuel Sigoloff, a doctor who granted medical exemptions to the military’s COVID-19 vaccine mandate, was ordered not to discuss COVID or see patients, and his medical license in Texas is under investigation.
A Proper Informed Consent Leads to 99.8% of Army Soldiers Refusing To Get Vaxxinated
Patrick says
This is going to sound pretty bad to most people but, joining the military means you are giving your life over to stupid fucks who couldn't care less about you. That, imo, is a stupid decision...joining the military. They can literally do anything they want with you.
Arnie1974
@Arnie1974
·
1h
Myocarditis Up 2800%: Army Veteran Pam Long Lists Alarming Numbers From the DMED Data Base
Myocarditis - Up 2800%
Cancers - Up 300% to 900%
Infertility (Both Genders) - Up 500%
Miscarriages - Up 300%
Neurological Disorders - Up 1000%
Demyelinating Disorders - Up 500%
Multiple Sclerosis (MS) - Up 600%
Guillain-Barré Syndrome - Up 500%
HIV - Up 500%
Pulmonary Embolisms - Up 400%
The federal government’s own data indicates that the COVID-19 vaccines U.S. service members are forced to receive are dangerous, medical experts explained as part of a Flag Day press conference hosted Tuesday by the medical freedom nonprofit Truth for Health Foundation.
The conference, which was live-streamed here on LifeSiteNews, addressed numerous aspects of the issue, starting with an overview of medical billing data from the Pentagon’s Defense Medical Epidemiology Database (DMED), first brought to light in January by attorney Thomas Renz, during a COVID vaccine hearing arranged by U.S. Sen. Ron Johnson (R-WI)
“Keep in mind, these serious medical conditions are happening in a young, healthy population of very fit military people who are not at risk of dying of COVID and who typically don’t have these health problems,” said Truth for Health president and CEO Dr. Elizabeth Lee Vliet. “The CDC database and the DMED database shows heart attacks and myocardial infarctions in the young, healthy military groups are up over 269% in ten months. Pericarditis up 175%. Myocarditis inflammation of the heart muscle up 285%. Pulmonary embolism. Blood clots in the lungs up 467%. Blood clots to the brain. Cerebral infarction. Bell’s Palsy, Multiple Sclerosis Immunodeficiencies Cancers, miscarriage. All are up over 250%, and some are up more than 350%.”
“Why would the DOD knowingly continue to force these vaccine mandates in the face of such damage?” she asked.
Military Doctor Testifies under Oath That She Was ORDERED To ‘Cover up’ Vaccine Injuries through Biden Admin Directive
JULY 24, 2022
Dr. Theresa Long, medical officer with the United States military, has testified in court that she was ordered by a superior to suppress Covid-19 vaccine injuries following the Biden regime’s mandate.
Dr. Long also testified that the data is showing that deaths of military members from the vaccines exceed deaths from COVID-19 itself.
U.S Coast Guard Dismissing Unvaccinated Members Despite Medical & Religious Exemption Appeals
Documents from whistleblowers inside the U.S. Coast Guard show that there will be a 30 day separation or discharge period of personnel that did not get the COVID-19 vaccine starting August 25.
Rebel News has obtained documents from whistleblowers inside the U.S. Coast Guard showing that there will be a 30 day separation or discharge period of personnel that did not get the COVID-19 vaccine starting August 25. Service members contacting Rebel News stated they saw this document around July 25.
A list of documents was shared with Rebel News consisting of ALCOAST 270/22, implementing the COVID-19 vaccine mandate on Coast Guard personnel, as well as ALCOAST 131/22, which restricted liberty/leave for unvaccinated personnel.
Documents also show how people who were denied religious exemption are not allowed to re-apply for an appeal.
Sources inside the Coast Guard also notified Rebel News that everybody who applied for a medical or religious exemption were denied, even if they met the criteria for the exemption.
Military whistleblowers: DOD's legally dubious mRNA mandate has harmed readiness, produced widespread injuries
Dozens of first hand testimonials and internal documents
Jordan Schachtel
37 min ago
A group of active U.S. military pilots are coming forward as whistleblowers to challenge both the legal and moral nature of the Department of Defense mRNA mandate, and they’ve produced some shocking testimonials that challenge virtually all of the mainstream narratives about a supposedly “safe and effective” mRNA vaccine. ...
Below you’ll find a few accounts from the first report, from direct testimony and internal documents provided from active service members to the whistleblowers. I encourage you to read the whole thing. Again, Congress has this information and can act upon it should they so choose.
Biden Admin officials scramble to escape blame for unlawful Pentagon order mandating mRNA for troops
Former Pentagon official Terry Adirim says she was directed by the Secretary of Defense to justify the mandate.
Lawyers representing America’s service members are beginning to produce victories defending the U.S. Armed Forces against forced compliance with biomedical gene therapy experiments, and suddenly, nobody in the Pentagon wants to take accountability for their legally dubious mRNA injection order.
It all began on August 24, 2021, when Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin issued a memo mandating mRNA “vaccination” for the active military, but with the stipulation that this mandate only applied to fully licensed products. This was because, as The Dossier understands, it is illegal to force service members to take an EUA vaccine. ...
Dr Adirim’s deceptive memo described the EUA and FDA licensed vaccines as “interchangeable,” adding that the Defense Department can “use doses distributed under the EUA to administer the vaccination series as if the doses were the licensed vaccine.” Adirim failed to note that the EUA vaccines were only administratively interchangeable, but not legally interchangeable, as made clear by the FDA. This should have rendered any mandate unenforceable.
In other documents and statements, she routinely made claims that FDA licensed vaccines were available to troops, when that was not in fact the case.
Following the mRNA injection order, untold thousands of service members were coerced — under threat of both administrative and criminal action — to take a “vaccine” that they wanted no part of. Unsurprisingly, this mandatory novel gene therapy injection has harmed combat readiness and produced widespread, serious, long term injuries throughout the armed forces.
The Pentagon’s unlawful order is being challenged in court by lawyers representing all branches of the military. On Thursday, the Marine Corps became the latest service branch granted a class wide injunction against the mandate.
Since leaving the Pentagon, Adirim has sought to distance herself from the letter, claiming that “crazy” attempts to hold her accountable are misguided, because it was “The Secretary” (Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin) who “directed vaccinations.” Neither Austin nor the Pentagon has confirmed that the Secretary of Defense ordered Adirim to sign off on the unlawful mandate.
Adirim remains in government as the program executive director of the VA’s Electronic Health Record Modernization Integration Office. As a government official, both she and the Secretary of Defense are easily accessible to testify via a congressional subpoena, should congress want to investigate their controversial memos. As Adirim’s memo has come under scrutiny, she has decided to lock her social media accounts.
Who, if anyone, will be held accountable?
Who, if anyone, will be held accountable?
@GNLused Try talking about it and see what reaction you get.
That's why.
Say one person in a thousand dies from the vaxx. This is still an epic disaster.
Do you have 1000 people in your own circle?
Then there is the attribution problem. It will be attributed to anything but the vaxx.
How can we KNOW for certain the jab is causing high numbers of deaths? I assume all cause mortality? But how can we be so sure those numbers will not simply be manipulated also?
All the evidence is moving in one direction only, and I expect at least some country will ban the vaxx as too dangerous to use eventually.
Patrick says
All the evidence is moving in one direction only, and I expect at least some country will ban the vaxx as too dangerous to use eventually.
After they mandated it? It would be admitting guilt.
That's never going to happen.
That's how it might happen.
Some country like Japan, which actually cares about its citizens because they are nearly all Japanese, will state the truth: Pfizer and the Pfizer-controlled US government simply lied about the safety and efficacy of the vaxx.
On the other hand, Japan knows that this would make them a lot of enemies in the Pfizer-controlled US government. Maybe if Republicans manage to the defeat the Democrat election-fraud machine in the midterms, that will reduce Pfizer's power and give Japan or some other such country the guts to say it.
On the third hand, Japan may not want to admit that their government was so easily fooled.
richwicks says
Patrick says
All the evidence is moving in one direction only, and I expect at least some country will ban the vaxx as too dangerous to use eventually.
After they mandated it? It would be admitting guilt.
That's never going to happen.
Maybe some other country can put the blame on another country?
It's just going to get worse because no matter what they do, there's no real resistance to it. When there's SLIGHT resistance, 800 people end up in prison with no bail and no court date supposedly have done an "insurrection".
I'm glad I'm not 20. This place will be a tyranny in another 70 years and I mean full blown. If you think it's bad now, just wait.
Country is gone.
Jason Standage, 43
August 22, 2022
Jason Standage, 43-year-old resident of Little Falls, MN, died unexpectedly Thursday, August 18 at his home. He loved music and music was a huge part of his life. Jason began his military career at the young age of 17, he was very passionate about the military. He served his Country in the Army National Guard for over 26 years. He worked for the National Guard in Hibbing, MN for 8 years in the OMS Shop and then transferred to Camp Ripley in 2013 and was currently a Federal Technician with the Department of Military Affairs.
https://wjon.com/jason-standage-43-little-falls/
"Vaccination" is mandatory of civilians in the Dept. of Defense:
All DoD civilian employees must be fully vaccinated by November 22, 2021, subject to exemptions as required by law.
https://www.defense.gov/News/Releases/Release/Article/2799045/Mandatory-Coronavirus-Disease-2019-Vaccination-of-DoD-Civilian-Employees/
Report Reveals Multiple Military COVID Shot Injuries
Aug 24, 2022
ORLANDO, FL – Several concerned active-duty military officers have compiled a comprehensive report with a sample of service members who have been significantly injured by the COVID shot as a result of being forced and threatened by the Department of Defense. This report has been sent to members of Congress from December 7, 2021, through August 22, 2022, requesting an immediate investigation of the harmful effects that the COVID shot mandates are having on service members.
Team Biden must pay for using military as lab rats for COVID-19 shots
... And just because service members are required by military oath to obey orders, that doesn’t mean they have to obey unlawful orders, or that they give up their rights to informed consent on medical matters.
“Americans never lose the right to legally refuse an EUA product,” the report goes on. “Prior to the administration of an EUA product, the recipient is required to be informed … of the option to accept or refuse administration of the EUA product.”
You know what else Americans are supposed to retain as rights, too — regardless of military affiliation or membership? Religious rights. The right to refuse certain medical treatments based on religious beliefs.
But that hasn’t happened. ...
From an IntellectualTakeout.org post in February: “Three military doctors recently released documents showing staggering increases in diseases among military personnel in 2021 … Compared to the previous five years, female infertility, miscarriages, breast cancer and anxiety have skyrocketed. … The Department of Defense has since disputed this … by claiming that the figures from the Defense Medical Epidemiology Database (DMED) used for this comparison were faulty, that the data from 2016 to 2020 was inaccurate.”
Are you freaking kidding?
Oh, but it’s not the shot. It’s the previous five years of data. Nothing to see here, folks. Go home. That’s the DoD’s explanation?
History, meet repeat.
In 1998, the DoD began forcing military members to take an anthrax shot.
From the Center for Infectious Disease Research and Policy website, in November of 2002: “The Pentagon’s mandatory anthrax shots caused adverse reactions in most recipients and helped prompt many Air Force Reserve and Air National Guard members to transfer to other units or leave the military between 1998 and 2000, according to a survey by Congress’s General Accounting Office. The survey indicated that 85% of troops who received an anthrax shot had an adverse reaction.” ...
How many times must members of our military be used as lab rats before it’s forever stopped?
Democrats despise the U.S. military, just as they despise America. That doesn’t give them a free pass to commit despicable acts against U.S. military members.
U.S District Court Judge Steven Merryday issued a blistering rebuke of the Department of Defense and Marine Corps for refusing to grant religious accommodation requests to service members.
Merryday did so when issuing a 48-page ruling Thursday in which he granted class-action status for all active and reserve U.S. Marine Corps service men and women in a lawsuit filed against the Secretary of Defense over the department’s COVID-19 vaccine mandate.
« First « Previous Comments 16 - 55 of 143 Next » Last » Search these comments
That is actually defense secretary Lloyd Austin. No one who dresses like that should be in charge of anything, let alone the US military.