patrick.net

The Clintons actually broke the laws Trump is accused of breaking
The DoJ must explain why they were never charged or prosecuted

It always ends up back with the Clintons, doesn’t it? The laws Trump may be charged under at Mar-a-Lago appear to have been violated by both of the Clintons, yet the two were never searched, never mind charged and never prosecuted. Any action against Trump must account for that to preserve what is left of faith in the rule of law applied without fear or favor, or risk civil disenfranchisement if not outright civil unrest.

The more obvious case involves former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, who maintained an unsecured private email server that processed classified material on a daily basis. Her server held at least 110 known messages containing classified information, including e-mail chains classified at the Top Secret/Special Access Program level — the highest level of civilian classification — that included the names of CIA and NSA employees.

The FBI found classified intelligence improperly stored and transmitted on Clinton’s server “was compromised by unauthorized individuals, to include foreign governments or intelligence services, via cyber intrusion or other means.” Clinton and her team destroyed tens of thousands of emails, potential evidence, as well as physical phones and Blackberries that potentially held evidence. She operated the server out of her home kitchen despite the presence of the Secret Service on property who failed to report it. Her purpose in doing all this appeared to have been avoiding Freedom of Information Act requests during her tenure as SecState, and maintaining control over what records became part of the historical archive post-tenure.

Clinton seems to have violated all three statutes Trump was searched under...

The point is that if the FBI is going to take a similar fact set and ignore one while aggressively pursuing another, it risks being seen as partial and political. Any further action against Trump and certainly any prosecution of him must address why Hillary was not searched and prosecuted herself. Fair is fair, after all.

And then there’s Bill Clinton. Bill made a series of some seventy-nine audio tapes from 1993-2001 with a historian inside the Oval Office, sometimes recording his thoughts and decision-making, other times directly recording his phone calls. He kept the raw tapes himself after a book was published in 2009, actually storing them in a dresser drawer inside the White House residence. Activist group Judicial Watch sued Bill for the tapes, claiming they were presidential records and had to be made available to the public through the National Archives (NARA), and that the Archives needed to seize the tapes. Clinton argued they were personal records outside the control of NARA.

In directly contravening what is happening with Trump, the court ruled in 2012, “NARA does not have the authority to designate materials as ‘presidential records,’ and NARA lacks any right, duty, or means to seize control of them.” ...

Any attempts to move the Trump case forward as a criminal one will first need to explain how it differs from the Bill Clinton case and from Hillary Clinton and her server. If DOJ can’t do that, then they have no basis to claim they are enforcing the law without fear or favor. It will be just plain old political quackery, using the criminal justice system to defeat Trump when the electoral system will not.

Although the former head of Crossfire Hurricane, Peter Strzok, was fired after the disclosure of his vitriolic anti-Trump tweets, several members of his team remain working in the counterintelligence unit, the sources say, even though they are under active investigation by both Durham and the bureau’s disciplinary arm, the Office of Professional Responsibility. The FBI declined to respond to questions about any role they may be taking in the Mar-a-Lago case.

Trump must account for that to preserve what is left of faith in the rule of law applied without fear or favor

risk civil disenfranchisement if not outright civil unrest.

I hope to wake up from the Twilight Zone nightmare someday

clambo says

I hope to wake up from the Twilight Zone nightmare someday

AMEN!

Also I would like the wind to slow down just a little bit. It's too windy to go sailing.

Also I would like the wind to slow down just a little bit. It's too windy to go sailing.

@stereotomy Which Great Lake are you near?

Patrick says

@stereotomy Which Great Lake are you near?

Lake Erie, in WNY. Barely within reasonable driving distance of @wookieman, and probably a couple of hours west of where @richwicks grew up.

I can hardly wait for Trump’s perp walk in handcuffs. More than a few Dem Globalist pussies would juice over that one.

However, if they tried, I imagine the Secret Service will hit the floor as the arresting ‘officers’ get chunked by military machine gun fire.

Mark Levin, the former president of the Landmark Legal Foundation and former chief of staff for Attorney General Edwin Meese, claims that after reviewing material related to the Aug. 8 raid on former president Trump’s home, Mar-a-Lago, it is the FBI that violated the Espionage Act, not Trump.

He's not.

He cheated, the election was massively and provably fraudulent, with thousands of people tracked by GPS as they went from ballot dropbox to ballot dropbox, stuffing illegal ballots and taking selfies of themselves doing it so that they would get paid by Zuckerberg.