patrick.net

It's almost as if trannies are mentally ill.

AmericanKulak says

Primarily, he's just a common thief.

Has anybody noticed that in our society that the easiest way "to move up" is through just outright fraud? This man claimed he experienced severe abuse through "conversion therapy" - but he can't name the person that performed it on him. He's a compulsive liar as well.

I'm no psychologist, but if I were to make a stab at it, he's got an extreme form of narcissistic personality disorder.

@AmericanKulak, put a warning on thread. The mug of this crossdressing freak is so ugly that I almost barfed.

Also, CULTURAL APPROPRIATION!!!

Lock xir up!

How in a busy airport does TrannyFuck know whose luggage is whose and what it contains? Does he have TrannyFuck fashion x-ray vision?

When they showed him in pictures, the luggage he 'stole' looked exactly like his own luggage, which meant he was using his job to sell intelligence ( being a TrannyFuck is a high maintenance mental illness what with dresses and makeup and shit) and the luggage stuff was a simple old tradecraft 'briefcase exchange'. That's why they shuttled him out of the job and covered things up.

This could be part of the cover story to avoid embarrassment of the 'ritual humiliation of the people' appointment, but this administration is beyond embarrassment already. But who knows in the world of artifice and fakery that is our daily bread.

Ceffer says

When they showed him in pictures, the luggage he 'stole' looked exactly like his own luggage, which meant he was using his job to sell intelligence ( being a TrannyFuck is a high maintenance mental illness what with dresses and makeup and shit) and the luggage stuff was a simple old tradecraft 'briefcase exchange'. That's why they shuttled him out of the job and covered things up.

NO.

If I wanted to engage in tradecraft, stealing secrets, I'd do it on a $12 SD card. That's now capable of containing all the research for the Manhattan project. Easy enough to leave it "accidentally" in a bathroom, or "drop" it. That's if I had TONS of information to smuggle. $12.

Or, if I had less data to exchange, I'd run a "cute cat" website or something similar using JPEG, and have my contact run another site that hosts public domain MP3s. Both of those use Fourier Transforms for lossy encoding. They basically take the data, and turn it into a series of sine waves, when you add all the sine waves together you get (close) to the original signal, not exact, but close. The way they save space is by discarding high frequencies you can't see (or hear) anyhow. You can hide data in it by placing REAL information in the highest frequencies which you really can't hear nor can you see - you can encode any data in that, including random, or encrypted data.

There will be some audio / image reduction, but it won't be noticeable, it would be perceived as high frequency noise, if you can even see it or hear it at all.

The days of smuggling information are basically long gone. You can't stop it. If somebody has access to information, it's now trivially copied and the only way to stop the person is to catch them in the act of duplicating the data.

I frequently make use of FFMPEG - this does video transcoding. If I have a file that is ridiculously huge, like 8 GB, I can reduce it to just 2 without any noticeable reduction in quality. I've done this with audio files as well, I have the entire series of MindWebs which I got from .wav files. TECHNICALLY it is reduced quality, but you'd have to be a mutant to be able to tell.

AmericanKulak says

BTW - IF that's the same dress, he appears to be wearing it backwards, because the pattern on the left shoulder doesn't match. Could be she just had several pieces of clothing that were the same design with different patterns as well.

Would be funny if it's true though.

Bd6r says

AmericanKulak, put a warning on thread. The mug of this crossdressing freak is so ugly that I almost barfed.

Also, CULTURAL APPROPRIATION!!!

My apologies. TRIGGER WARNING!

richwicks says

BTW - IF that's the same dress, he appears to be wearing it backwards, because the pattern on the left shoulder doesn't match. Could be she just had several pieces of clothing that were the same design with different patterns as well.

It is, the author has an instagram page and the dress first appeared in 2018. Also the necklace is her creation, and there's a picture of him with the necklace on without the red dress. Her luggage theft happened at DFW airport, and they are both known to be there at the same time from social media posts.

On the author's twitter, and Cernovich, you can see weaponized autism in action. Plenty of proof.

AmericanKulak says

It is, the author has an instagram page and the dress first appeared in 2018. Also the necklace is her creation, and there's a picture of him with the necklace on without the red dress. Her luggage theft happened at DFW airport, and they are both known to be there at the same time from social media posts.

I try to place a high bar on anything that might be false. Better let somebody get away with a crime, than falsely accuse them of the crime.

I don't believe this, but let's say this woman is full of crap, and that's not her dress, and people are just claiming they were at the same airport when they weren't (did you actually check?) and this is just a way for a fashion designer to take advantage of the fact this man is a luggage thief to build her brand? I don't have any sympathy for Sam Brinton, but at the same time, if it turns out he's being falsely accused, that will give him sympathy once it's found out he's been falsely accused.

richwicks says

(did you actually check?)

AmericanKulak says

they are both known to be there at the same time from social media posts.

On the author's twitter, and Cernovich, you can see weaponized autism in action. Plenty of proof.

I didn't screenshot the thread, but if you are interested you can check the screenshotted twitter threads and see all the connections made

AmericanKulak says

I didn't screenshot the thread, but if you are interested you can check the screenshotted twitter threads and see all the connections made

Screenshots can be faked.

Direct links to the posts.

Screenshots are FINE as an accessory, but without a link, it's just an image. Why wouldn't they include a link where they (supposedly) got the screenshot? It's right there! I constantly bitch about this. I've seen faked screenshots, I've made them (telling people that they are fake) to demonstrate how easy they are to make.

I constantly bitch and moan about this. I'll read some article purporting to be news, talking about the Mueller report or something 5 years ago, and all sorts of conclusions about what was SUPPOSEDLY said were drawn, but no page numbers, no quotes, no links. Do you know why? It was all bullshit, but it got plenty of people to believe it.

This isn't limited to "mainstream media", there's a very real propaganda campaign going on. Now people who repeat propaganda aren't necessarily doing it intentionally, although some are, but it's super easy to put an end to this - include links to original sources.

For this, it doesn't matter. Who cares if Sam Brinton is a 3 time or 4 or 10 time criminal? He's a petty thief, he's been fired, his public career of being a modern day freak show is over, who cares if he stole this woman's stuff or not? His life is fucked. Good.

richwicks says

Screenshots can be faked.

Direct links to the posts.

Screenshots are FINE as an accessory, but without a link, it's just an image. Why wouldn't they include a link where they (supposedly) got the screenshot? It's right there! I constantly bitch about this. I've seen faked screenshots, I've made them (telling people that they are fake) to demonstrate how easy they are to make.

I constantly bitch and moan about this.

If you care about it, it's trival to find. I'm not being a dick but there are two tweets there to look for. One tweet has 5M+ views.

if it was a major big deal, and not a fag trannie stealing a dress, I'd probably have posted the link.

AmericanKulak says

If you care about it, it's trival to find

yeah, EVERYBODY has to find it, it's "easy".

Make 100's, 1000's, 100's of thousands of people do the "trivial" work to find it. Well it's trivial, why haven't you found it?

People need to learn to ignore claims without evidence today. We've had hyperlinks since 1993.

Let me show you a recent example of something that was falsified and taken as "real":



So, that's not real.

https://www.reuters.com/article/factcheck-fake-poster-idUSL1N30F1AU

So it's Reuters, a notorious set of liars and propagandists, but let's see if the "Trans Rights Campaign" exists?

https://www.google.com/search?q=%22trans+rights+campaign%22

Nope!

Also, notice that the picture has no links. Even if there was a real organization called the "Trans Rights Campaign" - where do they get that 98% figure from? The same place that 97% of scientists agree that Global Warming exists - right out of their ass. It's made up.

And BTW - if I ever made a claim you think is bullshit, call me out. If I am full of shit, I'd appreciate knowing because the more I make a false claim, the bigger a fool I'm making out of myself. Rather admit I'm wrong, than be wrong.

richwicks says

where do they get that 98% figure from?

I sincerely hope that at least 98% of men would not date a transwoman.

HeadSet says

richwicks says

where do they get that 98% figure from?

I sincerely hope that at least 98% of men would not date a transwoman.

I think it's at least 90% wouldn't. I think most men, even if it's on a subconscious level, are looking for a mate to have children with.

Whatever, adults can do whatever they want and if that means they don't want to date a transgendered male or female, that's their right.

richwicks says

Make 100's, 1000's, 100's of thousands of people do the "trivial" work to find it. Well it's trivial, why haven't you found it?

I already found it, FFS.

SIGH

https://twitter.com/asyakhamsin1/status/1627541483245936642?ref_src=patrick.net

That took less than a minute.

Your example is NOT comparable: Mine had TWO users accounts, with time and date, and clearly a screenshot from twitter. Easily findable. Yours is just an image with a logo, no date, no time, no author/user.

The tweet now has 16M+ views.

AmericanKulak says

I already found it, FFS.

SIGH

https://twitter.com/asyakhamsin1/status/1627541483245936642?ref_src=patrick.net

That took less than a minute.

Where in their social media posts does it place them both at the same airport at the same time? That's the claim I'm bitching about that was made:

AmericanKulak says

and they are both known to be there at the same time from social media posts.

Supposedly through BOTH their social media posts, they are placed at the same airport (or city) at the same time.

Probably true, but when claims like that are made, provide a link. In this case, two links.

richwicks says

Where in their social media posts does it place them both at the same airport at the same time? That's the claim I'm bitching about that was made:

It's in the threads if you scroll through them. I'm not reading it for half an hour like it did this am.

This is a frivolous post, how much digging and copying links do you want me to do for a "Here we go again" post?

AmericanKulak says

It's in the threads if you scroll through them. I'm not reading it for half an hour like it did this am.

Fine, I'll just mark this up at "rumor" because at this point, I ignore unbacked claims. It doesn't matter anyhow.

People who make claims (not just talking about you, but about ANYBODY) that says "see this picture from social media it proves..." nothing unless there's a link to the post or a link to an ARCHIVE of the post on archive.org or something similar.