patrick.net

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/two-idaho-lawmakers-introduce-legislation-criminalize-giving-out-mrna-vaccines

Understatement of the year ... so far:

The Supreme Court is compromised. ...

Patrick says

The Biden administration is working with the World Health organization to basically over throw the United States government. Essentially, the WHO treaty is written in a way that it will provisionally take effect in May. Naturally, another pandemic is likely planned before the United States Senate would vote down ratification of the treaty. This would mean that WHO could force lockdowns, vaccination, masks, etc.

I know it is not constitutional, but they are doing it. The Supreme Court is compromised. ...

When are people going to wake up? When???

RayAmerica says

When are people going to wake up? When???

Don't have to dox your location, and not sure if you're a long time user here that changed their username, but in the midwest no one cares about covid. You'll see the occasional mask wearer, though not required. No vax mandates anymore even for government workers.

Given this is a CA centric forum and it's about 1/6 of the population for the US, I don't think CA people understand the rest of the country. WE DON'T CARE. We never did outside of Chicago. We went about our lives after the 15 days. We "stopped" the spread.

https://slaynews.com/news/renowned-oncologist-evil-covid-vaccines-caused-turbo-cancer-explosion/

Renowned Oncologist: ‘Evil’ Covid ‘Vaccines’ Caused ‘Turbo Cancer’ ‘Explosion’

A world-renowned professor of oncology has issued a chilling warning about Covid mRNA “vaccines” after concluding that the “evil” injections have triggered a global “explosion” in cases of deadly “turbo cancers.”

The warning was issued by Angus Dalgleish, a professor of oncology at St George’s, University of London.

Prof. Dalgleish, who is best known for his groundbreaking contributions to HIV/AIDS research, raised the alarm during an international forum of experts investigating the mass Covid vaccination campaign.

While addressing the Medical Doctors for Covid Ethics International forum, founded by Dr. Stephen Frost and moderated by Charles Kovess, Dalgleish told the panel of experts:

“We must stop messenger RNA [mRNA] at all costs… it’s not only mad, it’s evil.”

“The problem with [mRNA] is you have to stabilize it,” Dalgleish explained.

“And…they’ve never been able to significantly stabilize it…so it won’t integrate and wreak havoc and self-replicate.”

Dalgleish continued by declaring any injections using the mRNA delivery platform, not just Covid “vaccines,” must be stopped “at all costs.”

He warned that he has seen an “explosion” of deadly “turbo cancers” in his patients who have received Covid mRNA injections. ...

“The idea of giving it to cancer patients to try and interfere is one thing, and I could go along and support that 10, 20 years ago because I thought cancer vaccines were really important in gene therapy.

“That’s what I was doing,” he revealed.

“In fact, I was on the editorial board of a journal called Gene Therapy.

“So I do know an awful lot of what they accuse me of not knowing what I’m talking about

“But the idea that you’d give it to anybody other than a terminal cancer patient was never ever on.

“And until this pandemic was thought up and created and masquerading as an emergency, they couldn’t even [roll it out] for cancer treatment,” Dalgleish adds.

“That is the equivalent of exposing children to radium, on the ground.

“Let’s just see if it causes any problems in 10 or 20 years’ time.

“It’s not only mad, it’s evil. And we must stop it.

“And I’ll stop there because that is the big message I want to get across: We must stop messenger RNA at all costs.”

https://www.news.com.au/lifestyle/health/health-problems/emergency-no-longer-exists-doctors-call-for-covid-vaccines-to-be-pulled-to-reassess-safety/news-story/1bfd89ce40c2e07256a6620d22a1d63a

‘Emergency no longer exists’: Doctors call for Covid vaccines to be pulled to reassess safety

A petition calling for Covid vaccines to be pulled has attracted high-profile backers — including one of Donald Trump’s key appointments.

A petition calling for the “immediate suspension” of mRNA Covid vaccines has attracted a number of high-profile backers — including the man picked by US President-elect Donald Trump to lead the country’s main public health research agency.

The Hope Accord, an online petition launched earlier this year, states that a “growing body of evidence suggests the widespread rollout of the novel Covid-19 mRNA vaccine products is contributing to an alarming rise in disability and excess deaths”.

Such claims have repeatedly been rejected by public health authorities and leading medical experts.

“This new technology was granted emergency use authorisation to address a situation that no longer exists,” the petition states.

“Going forward, the burden of proof falls on those still advocating for these products to compellingly demonstrate that they aren’t resulting in net harm. Until such evidence is presented, regulators should suspend their use as a matter of standard medical precaution.”

The petition was co-created by Dr Joseph Fraiman, a Louisiana-based ER physician and medical researcher.

Dr Fraiman was the lead author of a study last year that reanalysed Pfizer and Moderna’s original randomised trials, concluding that the rate of serious harm from the vaccines was one in 800, far higher than previously suggested.

Dr Jay Bhattacharya, a vocal critic of Covid lockdowns who has been picked by Mr Trump to run the National Institutes of Health (NIH), called Dr Fraiman’s study “probably the most important paper during the pandemic” about Covid vaccines.

“It was a very rigorous paper and I think [it] had probably the biggest impact in my thinking about the safety of vaccines,” Dr Bhattacharya said in a July interview with Dr Fraiman for his podcast, The Illusion of Consensus.

Writing on X at the time, Dr Bhattacharya said the debate had convinced him to sign the petition calling for the vaccines’ regulatory authorisation to be pulled.

Another good graphic:

https://patientmaktpatientcv.substack.com/p/spikeprotein-in-covidvaccines-suppress

https://petermcculloughmd.substack.com/p/the-evidence-is-clear-its-time-to

The Evidence Is Clear: It's Time to Permanently Ban the COVID-19 mRNA Injections

In this compelling interview with Luiza Asyamova, I unveil overwhelming evidence that demands an immediate moratorium on the COVID-19 mRNA injections.

https://classythomasmassie.substack.com/p/biden-just-pardoned-fauci-despite

Compounding the impact on the heart is the fact that the mRNA jabs rolled out by Big Pharma also damage the circulatory system. Such damage results regardless of the specific protein carried by the mRNA payload. The somewhat surprising twist is that the harm does not require the presence of a spike protein to damage the body’s organs.

Test results also indicate circulatory damage is not the result of the presence of the COVID virus in the human body. Rather, it is the clot shot that is almost certainly at fault. In the spirit of honesty, it must be noted that the act of injecting an IV into a patient’s arm has the potential to exacerbate the damage all the more.

The Pharmaceutical Industry Colluded With Government to Harm Americans

The test results linked above exemplify Big Pharma’s collective negligence. The industry’s shortsighted mRNA shots should not have been injected into the human body.

Ideally, the entirety of those shots would have been pulled from potential use before injection. The federal government should also prevent their continued use today and across posterity.

https://jonfleetwood.substack.com/p/canadian-province-recommends-halt

In a bold move to protect Canadians’ health, a government task force for the province of Alberta has recommended a halt in the use of COVID-19 shots, citing their safety, efficacy, and the process through which recommendations were made. ...

The task force report specifically recommends “halting the use of COVID-19 vaccines without full disclosure of their potential risks, ending their use in healthy children and teenagers, conducting further research into their effectiveness, establishing support for vaccine-injured individuals, and providing an opt-out mechanism from federal public health policy.”

All mRNA injections should be completely halted because they are so dangerous.

https://slaynews.com/news/rfk-jr-running-mate-warns-ai-developed-mrna-vaccines-trigger-extinction-event/

RFK Jr Running Mate Warns AI-Developed mRNA ‘Vaccines’ Will Trigger ‘Extinction Event’

Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s former running mate Nicole Shanahan is raising the alarm over the emergence of technology powered by artificial intelligence (AI) to develop mRNA “vaccines” for mass-vaccinating the general public.

Shanahan is warning that introducing AI-developed mRNA “vaccines” will trigger an “extinction event” that will massively depopulate the human race.

She joined in the chorus of voices expressing grave concerns about personalized mRNA shots being used to supposedly combat cancer.

The untested treatment was promoted by tech billionaire Larry Ellison earlier this week.

During an interview with Megyn Kelly on her podcast this week, Shanahan said:

“What we need for the mRNA platform right now is a moratorium.

“It’s not ready for human use.

https://rumble.com/v6e0cxv-top-oncologist-sounds-alarm-mrna-vaccines-are-driving-turbo-cancer-surge.html

World-renowned oncologist Dr. Angus Dalgleish has called for a global ban on Covid injections and "all mRNA vaccines" after discovering that the shots are "driving" the surge in turbo cancers.

original link

https://petermcculloughmd.substack.com/p/breaking-peer-reviewed-study-finds-5f1

The McCullough Foundation study, authored by epidemiologist Nicolas Hulscher, Dr. Mary Talley Bowden, and Dr. Peter McCullough, titled, Review of Calls for Market Removal of COVID-19 Vaccines Intensify: Risks Far Outweigh Theoretical Benefits, was just published in the journal Science, Public Health Policy and the Law:

Abstract: COVID-19 vaccination campaigns around the globe have failed to meet fundamental standards of safety and efficacy, leading to mounting evidence of significant harm. More than 81,000 physicians, scientists, researchers, and concerned citizens, 240 elected government officials, 17 professional public health and physician organizations, 2 State Republican Parties, 17 Republican Party County Committees, and 6 scientific studies from across the world have called for the market withdrawal of COVID-19 vaccines. As of September 6, 2024, the CDC has documented 19,028 deaths in the United States reported to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) by healthcare professionals or pharmaceutical companies who believe the product is related to the death. The total number of COVID-19 vaccine deaths reported to VAERS (37,544 among all participating countries) have far exceeded the recall limits of past vaccine withdrawals by up to 375,340%. The criteria for an FDA Class I recall, which applies to products with a reasonable probability of causing serious adverse health consequences or death, have been far exceeded. Excess mortality, negative efficacy, widespread DNA contamination, and a lack of demonstrated reduction in transmission, hospitalization, or mortality have undermined the rationale for continued administration. These unified requests for regulatory action underscore substantial shortcomings in data safety monitoring and risk mitigation. Immediate removal of COVID-19 vaccines from the market is essential to prevent further loss of life and ensure next steps are taken for accountability of the harm incurred.

https://anandamide.substack.com/p/molten-irony

Perhaps the Journal editors should consult a few AI platforms before they gobble down Gates funded fact checker pie. DeepSeek from China doesn’t seem to have drank the mRNA KoolAid. The country largely avoided the scam.

The very first thing it highlights is Oncogenic potential!

Prompt- What are the hazards associated with injection 50-500B SV40 promoters wrapped in LNPs?

DeepSeek-

Injecting SV40 promoters wrapped in lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) into a biological system, such as the human body, carries several potential hazards and risks. Here are some key concerns:

### 1. *Oncogenic Potential: - SV40 Promoter:* The SV40 (Simian Virus 40) promoter is a strong viral promoter often used in molecular biology to drive high levels of gene expression. However, SV40 has been associated with oncogenic (cancer-causing) properties in certain contexts. The promoter itself can potentially integrate into the host genome and disrupt normal gene regulation, leading to uncontrolled cell proliferation and cancer.

### 2. *Immune Response: - Immune Activation: The introduction of foreign genetic material, especially viral promoters like SV40, can trigger an immune response. This could lead to inflammation, autoimmune reactions, or other adverse immune responses. - LNP Immunogenicity:* Lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) themselves can be immunogenic, potentially causing an inflammatory response or other immune-related side effects.

### 3. *Genomic Integration and Mutagenesis: - Insertional Mutagenesis: If the SV40 promoter integrates into the host genome, it could disrupt essential genes or regulatory elements, leading to mutations that might cause disease, including cancer. - Off-Target Effects:* The SV40 promoter might drive expression of genes in unintended tissues or cell types, leading to off-target effects and potential toxicity.

### 4. *Toxicity and Cellular Stress: - Cellular Stress: High levels of gene expression driven by the SV40 promoter could overwhelm cellular machinery, leading to cellular stress, apoptosis (programmed cell death), or necrosis. - LNP Toxicity:* While LNPs are generally considered safe, high doses or repeated administration could lead to toxicity, including liver damage or other organ-specific toxicity.

### 5. *Biodistribution and Off-Target Effects: - Biodistribution: LNPs can distribute to various tissues beyond the intended target, potentially leading to expression of the SV40 promoter in unintended locations, which could have unpredictable effects. - Off-Target Gene Expression:* The SV40 promoter might drive expression of genes in non-target tissues, leading to unintended biological effects or toxicity.

### 6. *Long-Term Effects: - Persistence: If the SV40 promoter persists in the body, it could lead to long-term expression of genes, which might be undesirable or harmful over time. - Latent Effects:* There could be latent effects that only become apparent after a long period, such as delayed immune responses or late-onset oncogenesis.

### 7. *Ethical and Regulatory Concerns: - Ethical Considerations: The use of viral promoters in humans raises ethical concerns, especially given the potential for long-term and unpredictable effects. - Regulatory Hurdles:* Regulatory agencies may have stringent requirements for the use of viral promoters in therapeutic contexts, given the associated risks.

### 8. *Environmental and Horizontal Gene Transfer Risks: - Environmental Release:* If the LNPs containing SV40 promoters are released into the environment, there is a risk of horizontal gene transfer to other organisms, potentially leading to unintended ecological consequences.

Patrick says

Prompt- What are the hazards associated with injection 50-500B SV40 promoters wrapped in LNPs?

Love the Deepseek SV40 prompt. Good find!

According to the Federal government, SV40 (virus found in monkey kidneys) inadvertently contaminated millions of the early Salk Polio Vaccines.

Salk admitted the vaccines were contaminated.

65 yrs later, injecting altered forms of SV40 into your blood stream is not contamination.
It's safe and effective. Apparently.

Look no further than CDC's retarded Wikipedia page for official information about SV40.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SV40

Horrible:

Environmental Release:* If the LNPs containing SV40 promoters are released into the environment, there is a risk of horizontal gene transfer to other organisms, potentially leading to unintended ecological consequences.

Horrible-er:
Imagine the synergy of SV40 horizontal gene transfer combined with PFAS poisoned food crops and animal feed.

PFAS Bio-sludge:
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2024/mar/12/sewage-us-crop-farming-lawsuit-pfas

Good:
You can now run DeepSeek-R1 on your own local device
(for now)
https://old.reddit.com/r/singularity/comments/1ic9x8z/you_can_now_run_deepseekr1_on_your_own_local/

https://petermcculloughmd.substack.com/p/our-study-confirms-keeping-covid

by Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

As concluded in our new study, Review of Calls for Market Removal of COVID-19 Vaccines Intensify: Risks Far Outweigh Theoretical Benefits, we expect that calls for an immediate moratorium on COVID-19 vaccines will continue to increase until a critical mass is reached, and the products are finally removed from the market. Excess mortality, negative efficacy, and widespread DNA contamination associated with COVID-19 vaccines have been sufficiently demonstrated. The FDA's criteria for a Class I recall have been far exceeded. No large-scale, conclusive, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials have demonstrated reduction in infection transmission, hospitalization, or death as primary endpoints. Thus, the COVID-19 vaccines are not proven to be effective in reducing important clinical outcomes. A position supporting COVID-19 vaccination goes against good medical practice and violates the Hippocratic Oath to above all, do no harm. Immediate removal of COVID-19 vaccines from the market is essential to prevent further loss of life and ensure the next steps for accountability are taken. ...

In light of this evidence, failure to immediately remove COVID-19 ‘vaccines’ from the market constitutes mass negligent homicide...

https://geoffpain.substack.com/p/i-just-made-a-late-comment-on-australian

Australian Lawyers, under the banner of PJ O’Brien & Associates, have asked the FDA to “revoke or suspend” the approvals of Moderna and Pfizer mRNA Jabs, based on the failures of the FDA to refer the GMO products to the correct oversight committee - Cellular, Tissue and Gene Therapies Advisory Committee (CTGTAC) and a section of law requiring “Environmental Assessment” which includes the Human Environment.

Patrick says

Calls for Market Removal of COVID-19 Vaccines

Meanwhile:
A new vaccine approach could help combat future coronavirus pandemics (January 2025)

Funded by:
National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship
National Institutes of Health
Wellcome Leap
Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations

https://news.mit.edu/2025/new-vaccine-approach-could-help-combat-future-coronavirus-pandemics-0123

I'm going to be in the front row at the hangings, with a big bucket of popcorn.

https://slaynews.com/news/canadian-officials-reveal-deaths-soared-among-covid-vaxxed-call-immediate-ban-vaccines/

Government officials in Canada have just published a report confirming that deaths surged among people who received Covid mRNA “vaccines.”

The report was commissioned by Alberta Premier Danielle Smith.

The Alberta government’s COVID-19 Response Review officials investigated spikes in deaths of young people, teenagers, and children following the rollout of the injections.

According to Rebel News in Canada, the report has been quietly released but its findings are damning.

The report calls for an “immediate” ban of Covid mRNA “vaccines,” particularly for children.

https://jamesroguski.substack.com/p/submit-your-comment-to-the-fda

Katie Ashby-Koppens of PJ O’Brien & Associates submitted a Citizen Petition to the FDA on January 21, 2025 on behalf of Julian J. Gillespie, Kevin McKernan, David J. Speicher, Jessica Rose, and L. Maria Gutschi, requesting that the licenses and authorizations for the Pfizer-BionTech and Moderna mRNA products be REVOKED.



... Click on the link below to submit YOUR public comment:

https://www.regulations.gov/commenton/FDA-2025-P-0335-0001

Most people choose “Individual Consumer” from the choices in the pulldown menu...

... Click on the link below to read comments that have already been submitted and published.
https://www.regulations.gov/docket/FDA-2025-P-0335/comments

On the web page above, you WILL be able to read other people’s comments, but it will APPEAR that the comments have been closed. THAT IS NOT THE CASE. YOU CAN MAKE A COMMENT.

My own comment:

https://www.regulations.gov/commenton/FDA-2025-P-0335-0001

I know at least four cases of severe harm from the mRNA injections such as "Comirnaty":
- wife's co-worker dropped dead in her 30's after taking it: https://www.altamesafuneralhome.com/obituary/danielle-carmichael
- father-in-law developed tachycardia after taking it
- wife of friend developed myocarditis after taking it
- son of friend developed leukemia after taking it

It is immensely damaging to public trust in government agencies to leave the mRNA products on the market when so many millions of people have seen such severe harm from it first hand.

It also a gross abuse of the public to include the Google ReCaptcha spyware on this page, because it gives Google complete visibility into every keystroke users make and allows Google complete control over the page, for example allowing Google to quietly change the text presented to users.

Result:

Your comment has been sent for review. This process is dependent on agency public submission policies/procedures and processing times. Once the agency has posted your comment, you may view it on Regulations.gov using your Comment Tracking Number.

Comment Tracking Number m6o-71a5-aagk

https://www.preprints.org/manuscript/202406.2062/v1

Results: The CDC/FDA’s safety signals were breached for all 37 AEs following COVID-19 vaccination in pregnancy: miscarriage, fetal chromosomal abnormality, fetal malformation, cervical insufficiency, premature rupture of membranes, premature labor, premature delivery, placental calcification, placental infarction, placental thrombosis, placenta accreta, placental abruption, placental insufficiency, placental disorder, fetal maternal hemorrhage, fetal growth restriction, reduced amniotic fluid volume, preeclampsia, fetal heart rate abnormality, fetal cardiac disorder, fetal vascular mal-perfusion, fetal arrhythmia, fetal distress, fetal biophysical profile abnormal, hemorrhage in pregnancy, fetal cardiac arrest, fetal death (stillbirth), premature infant death, neonatal asphyxia, neonatal dyspnea, neonatal infection, neonatal hemorrhage, insufficient breast milk, neonatal pneumonia, neonatal respiratory distress, neonatal respiratory distress syndrome, and neonatal seizure. ...

Conclusions: We found unacceptably high breaches in safety signals for 37 AEs after COVID-19 vaccination in pregnant women. An immediate global moratorium on COVID-19 vaccination during pregnancy is warranted. The United States government, medical organizations, hospitals, and pharmaceutical companies have misled and/or deceived the public regarding the safety of COVID-19 vaccination in pregnancy. Promotion of these products must be immediately halted.

https://petermcculloughmd.substack.com/p/achilles-heel-of-mrna-platforms

One of the segments concerned the limitations of mRNA technology. Despite the exuberance over this platform in the biotechnology space, fundamental pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics are not understood nor controllable. Blunders made by mRNA inventors, all of whom work inside the behemoth Bio-Pharmaceutical Complex, seem to be universally overlooked as the platform is advanced by companies such as CureVac, Moderna, BioNTech, and many more. mRNA is also pushed heavily by vaccine incubators including CEPI.

https://petermcculloughmd.substack.com/p/breaking-sixth-study-confirms-negative

Sixth Study Confirms Negative Efficacy of COVID-19 mRNA Injections

It’s time for these infection-promoting genetic injections to be immediately removed from global markets.

The study titled, Effectiveness of the 2023-to-2024 XBB.1.5 COVID-19 Vaccines Over Long-Term Follow-up: A Target Trial Emulation, was published today in Annals of Internal Medicine: ...

VE was −3.26% (95% CI, −6.78% to −0.22%) against documented SARS-CoV-2 infection...

Conclusion:

COVID-19 vaccines targeting the XBB.1.5 variant of Omicron were not effective in preventing infection and had relatively low VE against hospitalization and death, which declined rapidly over time. ...

Vaccine effectiveness (VE) against documented SARS-CoV-2 infection was -3.26% (95% CI, -6.78% to -0.22%), indicating a statistically significant higher infection rate in vaccinated individuals compared to the unvaccinated control group. The small reported benefit against COVID-19-associated hospitalization and death is likely due to healthy vaccinee bias, as those who get vaccinated tend to have lower baseline risks.

These findings corroborate FIVE other studies demonstrating negative efficacy:

Nakatani et al - Vaccinated individuals had an 85% increased odds of COVID-19 infection compared to unvaccinated individuals (Adjusted OR = 1.85 - 95% CI: 1.33–2.57).

Eythorsson et al - Among individuals vaccinated, the odds of reinfection are 42% higher for those who received 2 or more doses compared to those with 1 dose or less (95% CI: 1.13–1.78).

Chemaitelly et al - The effectiveness of Pfizer-BioNTech (BNT162b2) against symptomatic BA.1 and BA.2 Omicron infections dropped from 46.6% and 51.7% (1–3 months post-dose) to -17.8% and -12.1% (≥7 months). Similarly, Moderna (mRNA-1273) declined from 71.0% and 35.9% to -10.2% and -20.4% over the same period.

Shrestha et al (Cleveland Clinic) - The risk of COVID-19 increased with the number of vaccine doses received. Individuals with one prior dose had a 107% higher risk of COVID-19 (HR = 2.07, 95% CI: 1.70–2.52) compared to those with no prior doses. Those with more than three doses faced a 253% higher risk (HR = 3.53, 95% CI: 2.97–4.20).

Feldstein et al (CDC) - Children vaccinated with Pfizer-BioNTech without prior SARS-CoV-2 infection were 159% more likely to get infected (HR = 2.59, 95% CI: 1.27–5.28) and 257% more likely to develop symptomatic COVID-19 (HR = 3.57, 95% CI: 1.10–11.63) compared to unvaccinated children without prior infection.

https://petermcculloughmd.substack.com/p/us-states-considering-legislation

U.S. States Considering Legislation to Ban mRNA Injections as of February 6, 2025

A critical mass will soon be reached, forcing the federal government to follow suit.

Legislative efforts to BAN the dangerous COVID-19 mRNA injections are now underway across multiple U.S. states, with bills being considered, drafted, and supported at various levels of government:




A critical mass will soon be reached, forcing the federal government to follow suit. If you are aware of any states that are missing from this figure, please let me know in the comments.

The evidence is clear—over 81,000 physicians, scientists, and concerned citizens, 240 elected officials, 17 professional organizations, excess mortality, negative efficacy, and DNA contamination call for the IMMEDIATE removal of COVID-19 "vaccines" from the market. Failure to do so constitutes mass negligent homicide...

Patrick says

U.S. States Considering Legislation to Ban mRNA Injections as of February 6, 2025

The home of Bill Gates, Washington State?
The poster child for mass negligent homicide with vaccines?

Legislation probably introduced by a lone wolf, republican.

https://slaynews.com/news/new-bill-demands-ban-covid-vaccines-due-enormous-numbers-deaths/

New Bill Demands Ban on Covid ‘Vaccines’ Due to ‘Enormous Numbers of Deaths’

Lawmakers in Montana have introduced a new bill to completely ban Covid mRNA “vaccines,” citing the “enormous numbers of deaths, disabilities, and serious adverse events” caused by the injections.

The legislation, proposed in the Montana House of Representatives, highlights multiple issues with the “vaccines,” such as a lack of evidence proving they are safe for widespread public use.

Additionally, the lawmakers suggest that mRNA injections are responsible for a surge in cancers, infertility, and excess deaths.

Further, they argue that the shots are contaminated with cancer-causing DNA fragments and warn that the side effects can be passed on to unvaccinated people through “shedding.”

The lack of transparency regarding the “vaccines” means citizens have been denied their rights to informed consent, the lawmakers note.

Therefore, the “vaccines” must be banned, they assert.

“To my knowledge, Montana is the first state to draft a bill banning mRNA. The first hearing is tomorrow. Support HB371!” Dr. Mary Talley Bowden said.

Montana House Bill 371 states:

WHEREAS, the mRNA vaccines have caused enormous numbers of deaths, disabilities, and serious adverse events; and

WHEREAS, no long-term studies have been completed regarding fertility, teratogenicity, mutagenicity, or oncogenicity; and

WHEREAS, recipients are not given informed consent; and

WHEREAS, the mRNA vaccines may integrate into the human genome and be passed onto the next generation; and

WHEREAS, the mRNA vaccines are contaminated with DNA, metallic particles, and other unknown nanoparticles; and

WHEREAS, the mRNA vaccines may shed to others and cause side effects or harm.
...

https://jonfleetwood.substack.com/p/idaho-looks-to-ban-gene-therapy-based

Idaho Looks to Ban Gene Therapy-Based Vaccines Like COVID-19, Bird Flu Jabs for 10 Years

S1036 is "protecting Idahoans from unnecessary medical harm from contaminated or harmful products," says Idaho State Senator Brandon Shippy.

Idaho State Senator Brandon Shippy (District 9) has introduced legislation that puts a ten-year moratorium on the administration of gene therapy products for infectious diseases, like COVID-19 or bird flu.

A ten year ban is a good start, but it's not enough.

https://slaynews.com/news/another-state-moves-ban-covid-vaccines-surging-deaths/

Lawmakers in Kentucky have just introduced a bill to ban mRNA injections amid reports of surging deaths, deadly diseases, and disabilities among those who received Covid “vaccines.”

Kentucky has now become the ninth U.S. state with legislative efforts to ban the mRNA shots.

The move follows similar legislation from lawmakers in Montana.

As Slay News reported last week, lawmakers in Montana introduced a new bill to completely ban Covid mRNA “vaccines.”

They cite the “enormous numbers of deaths, disabilities, and serious adverse events” caused by the injections.

The legislation, proposed in the Montana House of Representatives, highlights multiple issues with the “vaccines,” such as a lack of evidence proving they are safe for widespread public use.

Additionally, the lawmakers suggest that mRNA injections are responsible for a surge in cancers, infertility, and excess deaths.

Further, they argue that the shots are contaminated with cancer-causing DNA fragments and warn that the side effects can be passed on to unvaccinated people through “shedding.”

The lack of transparency regarding the “vaccines” means citizens have been denied their rights to informed consent, the lawmakers note.

Therefore, the “vaccines” must be banned, they assert.

Meanwhile, a similar push faced a major setback in Tennessee.

In Tennessee, a key Senate testimony for a proposed mRNA ban was abruptly canceled.

Sounds like Pfizer thugs got to someone in TN.

https://jonfleetwood.substack.com/p/want-to-ban-mrna-shots-heres-a-51

Want to Ban mRNA Shots? Here's a 51-Page Bill Template You Can Hand to Your Legislator

Backed by renowned medical experts in the health freedom movement.

But why 51 pages? Makes me suspicious that something is hidden in there.

https://www.sott.net/article/497894-Kentucky-Montana-Idaho-among-states-looking-to-ban-mRNA-vaccines

Kentucky, Montana, Idaho among states looking to ban mRNA vaccines

Michael Nevradakis, Ph.D.
Children's Health Defense
Fri, 14 Feb 2025

As calls to ban mRNA shots intensify worldwide, a growing number of U.S. states and communities are eyeing laws to prohibit or pause their use.

A bill introduced Tuesday in the Kentucky House of Representatives would ban until July 1, 2035, the administration of "any human gene therapy product for any infectious disease indication, regardless of whether the administration is termed an immunization, vaccine, or any other term."

Lawmakers in Idaho and Montana recently introduced similar bills. Legislative initiatives are in the planning stages or have been passed at the county level in at least four other states, including Iowa, South Carolina, Texas and Washington.

"A critical mass will soon be reached, forcing the federal government to follow suit," said epidemiologist Nicolas Hulscher of the McCullough Foundation.

Dr. Kat Lindley, president of the Global Health Project and director of the International Fellowship Program for the Independent Medical Alliance (IMA), said such initiatives are "important in sending the message" to public health agencies "that states recognize the damage mRNA shots have done to U.S. citizens."

Hulscher said the McCullough Foundation "will be actively engaged in legislative efforts to ban mRNA injections" in several states.

The state and local initiatives come as Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) called on the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to "immediately revoke approval" of the COVID-19 vaccines, in a post Wednesday on X.