patrick.net

Thought: If they can get away with demanding the opening of your bloodstream to arbitrary profit opportunities, we cannot survive for long.

Dr. Mary Bowden Rejects Texas Medical Board Compromise, Requests Public Hearing Over COVID Treatments

Facing anonymous complaints, Bowden could acknowledge guilt and pay a fine, but she has demanded a public hearing instead.

A Houston doctor facing anonymous complaints over COVID-19 treatments has rejected a disciplinary compromise offer from the Texas Medical Board (TMB).
Dr. Mary Talley Bowden, an Ear, Nose, and Throat specialist who studied medicine at both the University of Texas and Stanford University, says she has successfully treated more than 5,500 COVID-19 patients without a single death. She drew controversy in 2021 for promoting Ivermectin and other early treatments while publicly criticizing vaccine mandates.

After receiving complaints last year, the TMB launched an investigation and last week held an informal settlement conference with Bowden and her attorneys. At the conclusion of the conference, Bowden says TMB offered the equivalent of a plea deal that would require her to pay a $5,000 fine, attend eight hours of continuing medical education, and retake a jurisprudence exam required for all state-certified physicians.

“This was a closed-door meeting, during which I could accept their offer,” Bowden told The Texan. “But I will not plead guilty to crimes I did not commit. I want the opportunity to have my case heard in a public hearing and to call and examine witnesses.”

Responsible for licensing medical professionals in Texas, TMB has the authority to discipline or revoke certifications. Last December, the board disciplined or suspended 22 physicians for violations unrelated to COVID-19 treatments.

According to Bowden’s attorney Steve Mitby, two members of the TMB board and two attorneys for TMB also attended the conference, but Bowden and her attorneys were ordered not to share the identities of the other attendees.

“Texas Medical Board proceedings amount to a ‘Star Chamber,’” Mitby told The Texan, referring to a court used for rigged and secretive trials by English monarchs before being abolished by Parliament in 1641.

Mitby also noted that one of the TMB members present for the conference was a San Antonio physician specializing in a different field of medicine, while the other was a human resources administrator for a hospital.

Under Texas statute, complaints to the TMB may remain anonymous to the doctor subject to the investigation. Bowden says she only knows the complaints against her are from staff or administrators at Texas Health Huguley Hospital and Houston Methodist Medical Center.

One complaint regards Tarrant County Deputy Sheriff Jason Jones, who contracted COVID-19 in September 2021 and tried unsuccessfully to obtain Ivermectin.

Jones was admitted to Huguley Hospital and intubated on October 7, 2021. After hospital staff placed him in a medically induced coma, his wife Erin Jones requested he be treated with Ivermectin, but the hospital denied her request. She obtained a second opinion from Bowden and then sued for a court order to administer Ivermectin, but the hospital filed an appeal and called the police to block a nurse brought by Erin from giving Jones the medication.

Late in November 2021, an appeals court ruled the hospital could not be forced to allow Ivermectin treatment, but Erin Jones says she secretly applied Ivermectin to her husband in paste form and he was released from the hospital in May 2022. Bowden says she did not know Erin applied the medication in secret.

Although Jones’ wife requested the treatment in court documents, in a letter to Bowden’s attorney, the TMB cited allegations that Bowden prescribed Ivermectin for the treatment of COVID-19 “while [Jones] was in the ICU, without evaluating him, or obtaining informed consent for this use.”

Last year, TMB also said they were investigating allegations that Bowden posted photos of the staff and physicians of Texas Health Huguley Hospital who refused to administer Ivermectin “with the intent to harass, threaten and intimidate, which jeopardized their safety.”

During last Friday’s hearing, Bowden said she was not given the name of the expert that provided advisement to the board, was not permitted to cross-examine that expert, and that the participating TMB physician focused on hospital procedures rather than patient outcomes.

Patient’s rights attorney Beth Parlato, who represented Jones, told The Texan that during the pandemic she and co-counsel Ralph Lorigo filed 189 cases across the nation on behalf of hospitalized COVID-19 patients seeking access to Ivermectin or hydroxychloroquine.

“80 of those went to a hearing and we won the right to try in 40 cases,” said Parlato. “Of the 40 we won, 38 patients recovered and two died; one was a severely medically compromised 14-year-old girl and the other was a woman in her mid-sixties who had been ill for months.”

Parlota added that her legal team won all but one of the cases that went before a Republican judge, but lost every case that went before a Democratic judge.

“Now the Center for Disease Control (CDC) and the Food and Drug Administration have backtracked on warnings against Ivermectin and taken a more neutral stance, but these doctors are still facing consequences,” said Parlota.

The CDC’s current guidelines state that while“there are currently insufficient data to recommend ivermectin for treatment of COVID-19,” ongoing clinical trials might provide more information about “hypothesized uses in the future.”

A second complaint to TMB states that Bowden was suspended from the Houston Methodist Medical Center “due to failure to comply with COVID-19 guidelines and placing patients at risk.”

In November 2021, Houston Methodist publicly announced its suspension of Bowden’s hospital privileges and accused her of “spreading dangerous misinformation” about COVID-19.

TMB rules stipulate that investigations should be completed within 180 days of a complaint, but last May, a board investigator notified Bowden’s attorney that the investigation would take longer since “there were unavoidable delays in obtaining an expert review of the matter under investigation in this case.” The TMB originally scheduled a conference with Bowden for July 27, 2021, but suddenly postponed the conference without explanation on July 15.

Mitby said there is no mandated timeline for completing the process and that TMB has not yet provided a plea deal offer in writing.

“TMB is dragging this out,” said Mitby. “This is essentially a woke institution in the pocket of Big Pharma.”

Texas Sen. Bob Hall (R-Edgewood) has filed legislation that would prohibit anonymous third- party complaints to TMB and require the board to adhere to timelines for the investigation and resolution of complaints.

Bowden has also sued Houston Methodist Hospital seeking records related to COVID-19 deaths and financial arrangements related to treatment. Although a district court judge dismissed the case last month, Bowden has filed an appeal.

TMB did not respond to The Texan‘s request for comment by the time of publication.

https://thetexan.news/dr-mary-bowden-rejects-texas-medical-board-compromise-requests-public-hearing-over-covid-treatments/?trk=feed_main-feed-card_feed-article-content

https://boriquagato.substack.com/p/the-astonishingly-un-astonishing

more than anything, what emerges from this morass is just more proof of the proper frame for analyzing modern governance:

these are not the science kids working hard to be technocratic tutors.

these are the theater kids being drama queens.

please keep this framing in the back of your mind as you read on. it’s a key pivot. ...







all the “the hospitals are at massive risk” screaming was utter codswollop. hospitals and health systems all over the world damn near went out of business and had to be propped up with vast subsidies because volumes were so low.

but that story does not engender compliance. fear stories do. so guess what they told?

you got it. fear and guilt. just like they said they would.

keep in mind that all this shrill messaging with fear narrative, emotional appeals, and endless guilt from made up science like “stay home save lives” and “your mask protects me” was not an accident. it was military grade propaganda and weaponized behavioral economics. the UK in particular had a “nudge unit” of behavioral economists whose explicit job it was to help health agencies manipulate the public. many ultimately resigned in disgust at what was being done and some publicly apologized for having been involved.

but fear was what they wanted. fear is compliance. and they did it on purpose and with malice aforethought. it was not an accident. it was a program. it was a choice. and the citizenry were not the beneficiaries, they were the victims.

all this talk of “narrative” instead of science or data or morality?

perhaps it seemed like exaggeration.

well, here it is in their own words.

consider the hubris to not only posses but to share such sentiments and to do it in writing. they do not even seem self-conscious about it. it’s just reflex, something autonomic like breathing.




...




this is going to be the story, over and over.

this is going to be underneath every rock that gets turned over.

from fauci to pfizer to birx and trudeau. from newsom to lightfoot to cuomo and whitmer. from the new york times to the twitter files and evening standard to CNN.

it was drama club, not science society.

it was self-service not public service.

it was loud, manipulative, and wrong.

factually wrong.

ethically wrong.

wrong in conception and worse still in practice.

they would not tolerate debate or discourse.

and the reasons were simple and banal.

"Free speech is dangerous to foes of the Enlightenment and they know it. So they have at it by accusing these opponents of all sorts of grave crimes and misdemeanors, most of them clearly absurd--in other words, by calling them names and trying to scare them." --HL Mencken

this was not some 8d chess game.

watch these people speak. these are not cunning masterminds. these people are idiots.

they are stupid, venal, and narcissistic.

they think ONLY in narrative, not in facts or science or public welfare.

they are not even technocrats, they are the people who play technocrats on TV.

you did not get treated by health experts, you got treated by the people who played doctors on grey’s anatomy.

that’s going to be the everywhere autopsy of this debacle.

and the only real astonishment in it is how they ever thought they could get away with this.

they assumed the mantle of “benign despot” and those who do so never seem to nail the benign part, do they?

no one with the narcissism to presume to such power ever does.

folks like matt should be prosecuted. they waged war on we the people. it was not an accident. they set out to terrify and terrorize.

there should be no liability shield for such behavior nor any “qualified immunity.”

and it should not stop with them. do not accept sacrificial scapegoats but seek to corral the whole herd. there are a great many here who owe.

if we are not going to hold leaders accountable when they get stone cold busted deliberately lying to we the people to force us into subjugation and abridge and abolish our rights through deliberately made up/exaggerated fear narratives, just what are we defining as “the proper role and boundaries of government”?

do you really want to inhabit a society where such things are part of the permissible scope of work?

"you did not get treated by health experts, you got treated by the people who played doctors on grey’s anatomy."

Then why do so many medical people still believe? My wife's aunt still believes.

They believe because it is psychologically very difficult to suddenly give up the feeling of security, the feeling that there is some paternal figure looking out for their best interests.

https://www.amazon.com/Rise-Fourth-Reich-Confronting-Nuremberg/dp/163758752X/ref=zg_bsnr_5571255011_sccl_9/135-8886051-8883259?psc=1

A Wall Street Journal Bestseller

COVID-19 fascism was the worst tyranny in American history, and those responsible must be held accountable so nothing like it ever happens again.

COVID-19 was used to launch the worst tyranny in American history, which we’re still facing even now. It was also the worst oppression in global history since the Third Reich. Just as that evil required a reckoning at Nuremberg, this one does as well. In this Nuremberg 2.0, we call witnesses that our elected representatives and law enforcement agents need to hear from in order to know the full extent of the evil, and who is responsible for it—so that this never happens again.

“Those responsible are without remorse, so there must be a reckoning. Barring that reckoning, we promise you they will make us remorseful later for not holding them accountable now.” ~“Rise of the Fourth Reich: Confronting COVID Fascism with a New Nuremberg Trial, So This Never Happens Again”

https://sashalatypova.substack.com/p/clarification-of-my-message-on-the

We have a mass murder/mass injury event ongoing and bodies are piling up. The deaths and injury are the result of the forced injections of “health products” that do not comply with any regulations for pharmaceuticals nor the lists of ingredients or advertised chemical composition. Thus they should be deemed de-facto poison. Even if the manufacturers managed to produce these substances with fidelity to the label and the law, the products would be still extremely dangerous to administer on a mass scale due to numerous toxicities built into their design, which is perfectly well known to the regulators and manufacturers. Albeit, the latter got rid of employees with expertise and conscience to know this in the years immediately preceding “covid success”, and replaced them with diversity hires and software. The needles are in the hands of “nice people from healthcare” who are doing their jobs as commanded by their superiors.

Trial first

That guy is right.

Patrick says

That guy is right.

True, but he will be strung up before any of those WEF following clowns will.

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/fda-approves-fourth-covid-shot-infants-kids/

‘Simply Obscene’: FDA Approves Fourth COVID Shot for Infants and Kids Under 5
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s decision Tuesday to allow infants and children 6 months through age 4 to get Pfizer’s bivalent booster shot drew harsh criticism from pediatricians and others who said children don’t need any COVID-19 vaccines, let alone four doses.

People at the FDA are guilty of just about the worst possible crimes against humanity, in the service of Pfizer profits.

https://merylnass.substack.com/p/fda-authorizes-4th-booster-for-babies

FDA authorizes 4th booster for babies--while data from the UK and Germany suggest you cause 22 serious injuries with the shot in order to prevent a single child's hospitalization

We need to start charging the individual public health officials with crimes for acting outside their legal authority...

Malfeasance is an act that is illegal and causes physical or monetary harm to someone else. Malfeasance is intentional conduct that is wrongful or unlawful, especially by officials or public employees...

In the context of criminal law, “malfeasance” can apply to cases that cause financial damage or physical injury to another person. Malpractice is an example of criminal malfeasance."

I don't believe that the death jab ever prevents any hospitalization. It only causes hospitalization and death.

https://ashmedai.substack.com/p/2-case-reports-of-harms-caused-by

2 Case Reports of Harms Caused by the Vaccine Mandates
The stress of persecution can be lethal by itself

An under-explored dimension of the harms inflicted via vaccine mandates is the morbidity and mortality caused by the inherent persecution levied by such mandates against those who did not wish to get vaccinated. Whereas for someone harmed or killed by a vaccine they were coerced into accepting, the link between the mandate and subsequent injury suffered is obvious, injuries caused by the economical or psychological trauma inflicted by vaccine mandates are not as readily apparent.

This does not make them any less real. For someone suffering the torment of vaccine mandate distresses - such as the stress of losing their only means of making a living, social ostracization, or the confusion and self-doubt from being relentlessly gaslit that they are crazy and irrational to have any doubts about the “safe and effective” vaccines - the pain and the burdens are often unbearable and devastating.

The following two case report studies put human faces on this dimension of evil public health policy carnage, and are worth exploring to convey a clear sense of the very tangible and violent abuse perpetrated by vaccine mandates.

Case Report #1
Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection [SCAD] in the Setting of COVID-19 Pandemic-Related Stressors: A Case Report
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35419243/

This case report describes a potentially life-threatening cardiac event suffered by a woman that her doctors attributed as most likely due to the stress caused by losing her job due to refusing to get vaccinated. The authors of this study do a fairly good job of fleshing out the link between the stress of unemployment and developing SCAD.

Firstly, the authors are (surprisingly) quite blunt and forthright describing the probable connection between the vaccine mandate-related unemployment and the myocardial infarction brought on by the SCAD. This is atypical for pandemic literature, where anything critical of a mainstream pandemic policy is very gently worded to avoid portraying the mainstream narrative in any sort of negative light. (That merely stating scientific information in a clear and concise manner within scientific literature is a praiseworthy revolutionary act speaks volumes about the current state of institutional science.) ...

Case Report #2
Warning: There are extremely graphic pictures of dismembered body parts in the study discussed and linked to below, including in the PubMed abstract. Follow the links at your own peril.
"Freedom and Dignity Are Worth More than Life": The Dramatic Suicide of an Anti-Vax Man
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36360482/




The second case report describes a forensic investigation of a suicide by train collision committed in order to highlight the moral travesty of vaccine mandates, that occurred in Italy, and was published in a Special Issue "Old Issues and New Challenges in Forensic and Legal Medicine". (I couldn’t find any English-language media reports of the story, which is rather odd to say the least.) ...

It is unmistakably evil to afflict millions of people with economical and emotional trauma by mandating vaccines, even if vaccination would be clearly beneficial as a purely abstract scientific matter, let alone by mandating something that confers no medical benefit and what is likely the most lethal iatrogenic intervention in history.

Nonetheless, the establishment has relentlessly demonized & dehumanized those who refused the covid vaccines. President Biden infamously threatened, “We are looking at a winter of severe illness and death for the unvaccinated — for themselves, their families and the hospitals they’ll soon overwhelm.” ...

The unvaccinated (and many of those who were vaccinated) rightly perceived these as abhorrent threats. People have a vested interest in their predictions or statements being perceived as accurate, which biases them to be less than fully honest about anything that demonstrates they were wrong. This is especially pronounced for proclamations made to the public with great fanfare, and all the more so regarding an issue of enormous practical and moral consequence. ...

https://kunstler.com/clusterfuck-nation/the-season-is-here/

Next, we will go through the tipping-point where a critical mass of the population — not just in America, but throughout Western Civ, and even beyond — realizes that they have been poisoned and injured by the mRNA “vaccines” they were so eager to line up for. It will produce a special sort of collective agony centered around a raging despair that leads with astonishing speed to prosecutions. The torpor and uncertainty of the past three years evaporates and the machinery of law actually starts cranking again, and in the right way — not as a mere instrument of coercion and intimidation, but to actually seek justice.

Patrick says

astonishing speed to prosecutions

Maybe in Europe, but not in the USA. In the USA, courts will rule that nobody was actually forced to take the jab, and thus all those college presidents and government leaders who actually forced the jab will not be held to account. Hell, even the projab politicians will be re-elected.

There is no sane way to spin "You must take this jab or you will be fired, or expelled from school, or discharged from the military" as "No one was forced to take the jab."

You can believe that 2 + 2 = 5 if you are insane though.

Patrick says

There is no sane way to spin "You must take this jab or you will be fired, or expelled from school, or discharged from the military" as "No one was forced to take the jab."

Agreed, but this is courts we are talking about. Reality is 2nd place to "saying it makes it true." Transwomen are real women, for example.

Right, reality is simply ignored lately.

HeadSet says

Patrick says

There is no sane way to spin "You must take this jab or you will be fired, or expelled from school, or discharged from the military" as "No one was forced to take the jab."

Agreed, but this is courts we are talking about. Reality is 2nd place to "saying it makes it true." Transwomen are real women, for example.

Patrick says

Right, reality is simply ignored lately.

"I manifest what I want the world to be!"

Reality does not negotiate.

Patrick says

There is no sane way to spin "You must take this jab or you will be fired, or expelled from school, or discharged from the military" as "No one was forced to take the jab."

You can believe that 2 + 2 = 5 if you are insane though.

I want to know if the Nuremberg Code holds any weight in this at all. Coercion and threats are a big no-no.

Legally, yes, it absolutely should:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuremberg_Code

The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, overreaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision. This latter element requires that before the acceptance of an affirmative decision by the experimental subject there should be made known to him the nature, duration, and purpose of the experiment; the method and means by which it is to be conducted; all inconveniences and hazards reasonably to be expected; and the effects upon his health or person which may possibly come from his participation in the experiment. The duty and responsibility for ascertaining the quality of the consent rests upon each individual who initiates, directs, or engages in the experiment. It is a personal duty and responsibility which may not be delegated to another with impunity.

But what we have here is a gross violation of the Nuremberg Code on a global scale by a mafia which is apparently running the planet for their own profit.

Everyone who mandated that poison must be hanged as soon as possible.

They are still gaslighting people. Every day I see or hear ads hawking mor jabs.

PeopleUnited says

They are still gaslighting people. Every day I see or hear ads hawking mor jabs.

The most disgusting thing about that is they are using our stolen tax money to do it, followed very closely by all that we know to be wrong about the jabs…

https://prosecutenow.io/

OUR PURPOSE
Our purpose manifold:

First, to reveal to you, the public, the criminal organization that is seeking to coercively extort and obtain complete control over the global population. The primary instruments of the organization’s criminal conduct include the creation of patented bioweapons marketed as novel viruses and injections.

Second, to remove the protective anonymity of the criminal syndicate’s participants, including individuals, business entities, and government organizations who are pursuing a 21st century, 100-year program, called “The Century of the Vaccine.”

Finally, to expose and detail the specific crimes this organization has committed to extort commercial gain from, and raw political power over citizens of the United States of America and the world through the creation and use of bioweapons and engaging in bio-terrorism.

We all know that they released the Wuhan bioweapon right after the Trump impeachment failed.

Scott Atlas says, " They killed people with the lies."

Onvacation says

We all know that they released the Wuhan bioweapon right after the Trump impeachment failed.

Yes, it seems too convenient to have been a coincidence.

https://nocollegemandates.substack.com/p/stanford-sunsets-covid-vaccine-mandates

I was as shocked as anyone. It comes much too late and the very large majority of their students and faculty complied with COVID-19 vaccine mandates, but incoming freshman and newly hired faculty will no longer be subject to this unethical and unscientific policy, and for that, we are grateful.

Stanford announced in April 2021 that students would be required to take the COVID-19 primary series prior to the fall 2021 semester. A few months later, in July 2021, we learned that the husband of a Stanford professor of law and medicine had a stroke a few days after his receiving his second COVID-19 shot, but doctors assured the family that the vaccine he took “hasn’t been associated with stroke”. When Professor Michelle Mello asked her husband’s medical team to file a VAERS report, the staff “shifted uncomfortably”, but she knew why.

Not good enough.

Hangings are necessary.