patrick.net

Patrick says

you imported the garbage that the Muslim countries wanted to put in prison or isolate away from society. You went and you imported them. Why? For cheap labor.

Not for cheap labor. As the author contradicts himself later "they don’t want to work, they want free welfare. They want to marry French women with blond hair and blue eyes. They don’t have time for work,” he said. The French are taking them as supposed refugees on orders of someone not interested in preserving France.

zzyzzx says

"Inmigrates" or "Migringrates" Ingrate+migrant

Poland is the most based country in the world right now.

Eric Holder says

Poland is the most based country in the world right now.

In Europe. Japan has long had a ban on Muslim immigration.

HeadSet says

Eric Holder says

Poland is the most based country in the world right now.

In Europe. Japan has long had a ban on Muslim immigration.

I think Japan has a ban on immigration period.

HeadSet says

Eric Holder says

Poland is the most based country in the world right now.

In Europe. Japan has long had a ban on Muslim immigration.

So does the Singapore with all the strict checks and procedures with Islamic neighboring countries like Malayala, Indonatia and India!

richwicks says

I think Japan has a ban on immigration period.

Japan still naturalizes a few thousand per year and allows residency to spouses of citizens and long-term workers. No Muslims.

HeadSet says

richwicks says

I think Japan has a ban on immigration period.

Japan still naturalizes a few thousand per year and allows residency to spouses of citizens and long-term workers. No Muslims.

Well, maybe - I don't know much about it. But I DO know that the Japanese are very resistant to cultural changes. You have to conform there, and they have no tolerance for any sort of criminality.

richwicks says

HeadSet says

richwicks says

I think Japan has a ban on immigration period.

Japan still naturalizes a few thousand per year and allows residency to spouses of citizens and long-term workers. No Muslims.

Well, maybe - I don't know much about it. But I DO know that the Japanese are very resistant to cultural changes. You have to conform there, and they have no tolerance for any sort of criminality.

Japanese are not stupids, no Muslim get any visa to go and destroy their country forever. However, there are "illegals" (known to authorities;) who work in certain industries that no Japanese willing to work like waster processing/rubber/plastic. They work in confinements and might roam around late night in certain part of the cities not to get caught. Its unlikely but some of them could be from Muslim countries. Remember there are 4th,5th generation of Koreans who know nothing about Korea are not recognized by Japan as citizens. Japan has a strict immigration system every "gaijin" (foreigner) must carry a immigration card (very hard to duplicate). Police occasionally check on streets and take to station and detain if one does not carry a valid card.

richwicks says

Well, maybe - I don't know much about it. But I DO know that the Japanese are very resistant to cultural changes. You have to conform there, and they have no tolerance for any sort of criminality.

I suspect China is the same or worse.

,

Not just a majority, a large majority:

https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/poles-overwhelmingly-oppose-eu-migration-reforms

According to the latest study commissioned by Poland’s Center for European Policy Research, 81.4 percent of Polish respondents are against the idea of mandatory migrant quotas for member states, compared to just 18.6 percent who back the plan.

Poland is taking in a significant number of Ukrainian refugees. Does that not count?

HeadSet says

Poland is taking in a significant number of Ukrainian refugees. Does that not count?

Poland is likely to annex portions of Ukraine if the country is destroyed. They're practically the same people.

HeadSet says

Poland is taking in a significant number of Ukrainian refugees. Does that not count?

It should.

I was just there and talked to relatives about this. The Poles do not feel themselves to be at all the same as Ukrainians, and vice versa. Poles have their own history, religion, alphabet, language, etc which are different from those of the Ukrainians.

There are Ukrainian refugees, but they were not very visible to me, except for some large black SUV's with Ukrainian plates. Very sketchy.

Aside from that, all I noticed was a group of Ukrainians protesting in the center of Krakow.

Ukrainians looks same but not the same. And remember, majority who came to Poland are woman and children. They got the same access to Polish welfare system as Poles. However, they are not lay back type of people. They want to work and earn. Yes, you can find them in back of restaurants, construction, stores or domestic help. Found some learning Polish language in fast way, due to world similarity and many also know some English so Polish alphabet is not strange to them. War refugees generally are not poor people. Poland traditionally have some old school Ukrainians totally assimilated, who came after World War II as an inclusion to transition of indigenous Poles from east (later Russian territory) residents to new land taken from Germans. E.g., In Krakow I made some purchases in store where salesperson was well speaking Polish, young Ukrainian girl with noticeable accent. Another I know, was able to text me in correct Polish language after 4 months stay and attending Polish language school.

America is the aggressor, repeatedly lying that NATO would not be extended, then doing it anyway, several times.

The US would not tolerate Russian control over Mexico any more than the Russians should tolerate US control over Ukraine.

Patrick says

America is the aggressor, repeatedly lying that NATO would not be extended, then doing it anyway, several times.

Yeah, that is a major reason Putin came into power in the late 1990s after Poland joined NATO. Bill Clinton started this.

.

Patrick says

America is the aggressor, repeatedly lying that NATO would not be extended, then doing it anyway, several times.

This is simply false: at no
point non-expansion of NATO was promised or agreed upon. There is no document signed by US saying so. It's simply bullshit and fabrication by certain war criminal trying to justify an agressive war (not that it would be a valid justification anyway).

But you are welcome to refute me by producing such agreement or treaty - it should be easy in this day and age of everything being online. Let's start with the name of that supposed treaty or agreement.

RWSGFY says

Patrick says

America is the aggressor, repeatedly lying that NATO would not be extended, then doing it anyway, several times.

This is simply false: at no
point non-expansion of NATO was promised or agreed upon. There is no document signed by US saying so. It's simply bullshit and fabrication by certain war criminal trying to justify an agressive war (not that it would be a valid justification anyway).

But you are welcome to refute me by producing such agreement or treaty - it should be easy in this day and age of everything being online. Let's start with the name of that supposed treaty or agreement.

https://uwidata.com/25911-natos-pledges-in-documents-not-to-expand-eastward/

Search for https - you'll find documents there.

Who cares? It's not like the US doesn't break every treaty it signs or break every promise it makes.