patrick.net

A closer examination of Audrey Hale's shoes before and after the shooting reveals that the shoes are different - meaning, this footage of the alleged shooting was shot on different dates!

Take a look:



When Audrey enters the school the front part of her shoe is white.

When Audrey is shot and killed by the police the front part of her shoe is black.

So... when did she change her shoes? No answer...

In other words the shooting is fake. Audrey Hale entered an empty school without students, without teachers and without staff.

Other anomalies is that despite the fact she was shot a number of times there is no blood spatter on Audrey's body and no visible injuries.

And look at the glass window where she was shot. No broken glass from the shots fired in the huge window behind her.

And where is her manifesto? In April, Rep. Tim Burchett (R-Tenn.) told the New York Post that the FBI is blocking the release of the Manifesto because Audrey's manifesto is 'Astronomically Dangerous.'

The_Deplorable says

When Audrey enters the school the front part of her shoe is white.

When Audrey is shot and killed by the police the front part of her shoe is black.

So... when did she change her shoes? No answer...

I believe this is an artifact of digital encoding.

Human eyes are NOT that sensitive to color changes, to the point that we encode 1/2 the color information as we do luminescence (brightness) information.

If this was all some sort of government setup operation, the manifesto would have been pushed and ready to go.

When Audrey enters the school the front part of her shoe is white.
When Audrey is shot and killed by the police the front part of her shoe is black.

richwicks says

"I believe this is an artifact of digital encoding. Human eyes are NOT that sensitive to color changes, to the point that we encode 1/2 the color information as we do luminescence (brightness) information."

No. These are different shoes from different manufacturers. No ifs or buts. Evidently it took a couple of days for the FBI to complete the cinematography of this attack against our children and We The People.

In addition, the videos from the police body cameras do not have time and date stamps. <==== Read this again.

In addition, the videos from the police body cameras do not have time and date stamps.

And this because it took a couple of days to shoot this fabrication. This alone exposes the shooting as a fraud.

Besides, the woman outside the school directing the police to the shooter inside the school has information that she cannot have. How did she know the location of Audrey Hale? No answer!

The_Deplorable says

No. These are different shoes from different manufacturers. No ifs or buts. Evidently it took a couple of days for the FBI to complete the cinematography of this attack against our children and We The People.

I already looked into this in detail:


original link

This is played at 1/8th the speed, the shoes clearly show up in several frames as only black and white.

So, whenever the government puts out BULLSHIT, and they are LYING about something, a bunch of nonsense shows up immediately afterward by the intelligence agencies to prevent any discussion about the event, because if you try to talk about how the government LIED about it, you're that "crazy lunatic that believes this crazy nonsense about X".

Just try to talk about 9/11 without having somebody say "Oh, you thought the planes were HOLOGRAMS?? You think UFOs brought them down??? Think that Directed Energy Weapons dustified the buildings??"

The manifesto isn't there. That's your "what the fuck" contention.

richwicks says

"This is played at 1/8th the speed, the shoes clearly show up in several frames as only black and white."

The front of the shoe in your clip is not white. What are you talking about?

In addition the the video of the police body camera in your clip does not have time and date stamps. It is a fabrication!

Give it a rest!

The_Deplorable says

The front of the shoe in your clip is not white. What are you talking about?

No, it's not - it isn't in either video or picture.

The_Deplorable says

In addition the the video of the police body camera in your clip does not have time and date stamps. It is a fabrication!

So what are you proposing? They had her walk into an empty school and get shot and had her change shoes, but not clothing? In the surveillance camera, why didn't they murder her then? Was it another person?

I am well acquainted with propaganda. They crazy EVERYTHING up. Take out a minor detail and blow it up.

Where's the manifesto? If there was a plan here, why isn't "her" manifesto printed?

I know something about digital video encoding. I used to deal with that bullshit back when it was motion JPEG! What's recorded is what you can see, and you can see this in films. You'll see it if you do transcoding and reduce quality. Why are you picking on something that can be explained?

Explain where the fucking manifesto is? How did she get her weapons? Where did she buy them?

She's probably just another FIB patsy but she probably also killed people. FIB has no problem with murder.

richwicks says

"This is played at 1/8th the speed, the shoes clearly show up in several frames as only black and white."

No. The front of the shoe in your clip is not white. What are you talking about?

richwicks says

"No, it's not - it isn't in either video or picture."

You are contradicting yourself. You told us "the shoes clearly show up in several frames as only black and white." When Audrey enters the school the front of her shoe is black and white. The dead Audrey Hale is wearing a different shoe.

In addition the video of the police body camera in your clip does not have time and date stamps. It is a fabrication!

richwicks says

"So what are you proposing?"

A police body camera without time and date stamps is not evidence. It is a fabrication.

The_Deplorable says

No. The front of the shoe in your clip is not white. What are you talking about?

Show me the picture you are talking about. I'll take a screenshot of my own and we can compare.

richwicks says

"Show me the picture you are talking about."

I already posted two pictures side by side.

See my comment at 215. These are two different shoes proving that this is a fabricated shooting.

The_Deplorable says

I already posted two pictures side by side.

Show a close up of the shoes, I'll show a single clip of the video I went through the painstaking process to extract and slow down, and demonstrate they are the same.

I'm sick of this stupid bullshit. You are like a dumb cat, following a laser pointer.

If this was some sort of government bullshit:

What's the motivation to do this by the government if it was a fake? You have no idea. Why would they have Audrey go to the school twice? You have no idea. Who killed the 6 people? You have no idea. Why didn't they have a fake manifesto prepared and ready to be released? You have no idea. Why would they match up her clothing entirely twice, but not her shoes? You have no idea.

I'm tired of people latching onto bullshit, and crazing it up making wild claims with no fucking evidence or even thought about the what it would mean if they were even correct.

You know what Occam's Razor ACTUALLY says? The explanation with the least number of assumptions is likely to be the correct one, the explanation with NO assumptions made, must be correct. You go the FUCK OUT OF YOUR WAY to make as many assumptions as possible. Got 100 loose threads? That must be it, look at the shoes!!!!!!@!!!!1

Image encoding drops a lot of shit, you cannot see, all the fucking time. I used to work in this field. You don't don't believe me? Well fuck you.

Rick, Using foul language is not an argument. It simply shows ignorance, arrogance and frustration from your part in the face of a truth you cannot handle - namely that the shooting at the Presbyterian School was organized, planned and executed by the government like so many others.

richwicks says

"Image encoding drops a lot of shit, you cannot see, all the fucking time. I used to work in this field. You don't don't believe me? Well fuck you."

This is a fallacy, the appeal to authority. Not a valid argument...

Besides, I don't need Image encoding to know that these are two different pairs of shoes. In addition, the government did not use Image encoding and We The People are pointing out the obvious - these are two different pairs of shoes! This is not rocket science.

richwicks says

"You know what Occam's Razor ACTUALLY says? The explanation with the least number of assumptions is likely to be the correct one,"

Yes, so how come your Occam's Razor requires you to add fabricated evidence? The video of the police body camera in the government clip does not have time and date stamps. It is not evidence, it is a fabrication!

Occam's Razor says that this is a government sponsored shooting.

Have a nice day.

To many inconsistencies like with the shoes. This just raises more questions as far as what actually happened.

How controlled are the witnesses such as the school administrator that met with the first police officer outside the school ?

How much are the witnesses discussing now such as being interviewed by independent journalists and watchdogs ?

.

The_Deplorable says

government protects trannies

FortwayeAsFuckJoeBiden says

"government protects trannies"

Audrey Hale was not a tranny and the evidence we have shows that this was a Globalist directed shooting:

1. Audrey Hale was autistic with emotional disorders making her an ideal candidate for a Globalist school shooting... And she was probably medicated to make the shooting easier.

2. Audrey Hale was not a transgender person. The fact that she wore a tie in one presentation in college does not make her transgender - It is not unusual for women to wear ties and she appears to be a beautiful attractive woman in that photo.

3. When Audrey Hale entered the school, the parking lot was empty, the school was empty. No students, no teachers and no staff! Empty!

4. Allegedly, Audrey Hale bought guns from from five different gun shops, except there is no surveillance videos from these gun shops showing Audrey buying these guns. This is evidence. Where is it?

5. Moments before she was killed by the police we heard Audrey Hale shooting - except she was alone in an empty space by a stairway. So, the shooting we heard was part of the show.

6. In the end, the goal of this Globalist shooting was to show a transgender woman attacking a Christian school and to have the American people give up their guns.

7. The videos of the shooting are fabricated and evidently it took a couple of days to film this so-called shooting... When Audrey enters the school the front part of her shoe is white. When Audrey is shot and killed by the police the front part of her shoe is black. So... when did she change her shoes? No answer...

8. Audrey Hale was shot 8 times and there is no blood anywhere! There is no blood spatter on Audrey's body and no visible injuries.

9. And look at the glass window where she was shot. No broken glass from the shots fired in the huge window behind her.

10. The videos from the police body cameras do not have time and date stamps - meaning, these videos are fabricated.

11. Police gun shows no recoil when it was firing at Audrey Hale. A frame by frame view of the shooting of Audrey Hale reveals that the police gun was firing blanks.

12. The woman outside the school directing the police to the shooter (at the second floor) inside the school has information that she cannot have.

And the icing on the cake is the manifesto: According to the FBI "Audrey's manifesto is 'Astronomically Dangerous."

No kidding? Astronomically dangerous to whom?

The_Deplorable says

6. In the end, the goal of this Globalist shooting was to show a transgender woman attacking a Christian school and to have the American people give up their guns.

This makes zero logical sense.

This is very broken reasoning.

"6. In the end, the goal of this Globalist shooting was to show a transgender woman attacking a Christian school and to have the American people give up their guns."

richwicks says

"This makes zero logical sense. This is very broken reasoning."

--------------------
Not really.

• In the Presbyterian shooting the Globalists are presenting a rift between Christianity and transegenderism. And this is nonsense. For Christianity transegenderism is just another sin.

• In the Buffalo shooting of May 14, 2022 the Globalists are presenting the shooting as a war of white supremacists against blacks.

Right now the goal behind these shootings is to have the American people give up their guns.

The_Deplorable says

• In the Presbyterian shooting the Globalists are presenting a rift between Christianity and transegenderism. And this is nonsense. For Christianity transegenderism is just another sin.

• In the Buffalo shooting of May 14, 2022 the Globalists are presenting the shooting as a war of white supremacists against blacks.

Right now the goal behind these shootings is to have the American people give up their guns.

Look, the only thing people think about Audrey Hale is that she was mentally ill. Just because a mentally ill person shot 6 people isn't going to make other people think "oh god, we have to give up our guns".

What it makes ME think is we need an overhaul access to mental health. NOBODY is rethinking their position on the 2nd amendment because of any of these mass shootings or murders. Chicago is a gun free zone, that helping keeping down the murder rate with guns?

The media has jumped the shark on their credibility. I would estimate that 25% or more of the population has NO trust in corporate media. That's way up from the 1% it was 30 years ago. They can't set the agendas anymore. Too many people know the media just lies, and as a result, just ignores it. People are fed up with social propaganda in television and film programming, so they avoid it.

30 years ago, hardly anybody DIDN'T watch television, today, most 30 year and younger kids never watch it. It's just a display for them and anything they get, they get off the Internet.

Well, for starters, why don't we get to read the damned letter.

https://nypost.com/2023/08/15/its-democracy-in-the-dark-without-nashville-shooter-manifestos-release/

AmericanKulak says

Well, for starters, why don't we get to read the damned letter.

https://nypost.com/2023/08/15/its-democracy-in-the-dark-without-nashville-shooter-manifestos-release/

Who gives a shit about what some asshole "journalist" (really a propagandist) writes about.

I know the article contains a reference to the manifesto - it's lost at this point. IF we ever see it, it will be "adjusted" by the time we do.

It's pointless to debate about the contents, though I'd drop a $20 almost certainly some kind of negative reflection on LGBTQ+ groups and rhetoric.

But I want to see it just because it's harmful. I want to know what the status is. Hopefully somebody will just leak the damn thing.

richwicks says

Just because a mentally ill person shot 6 people isn't going to make other people think "oh god, we have to give up our guns".

You are correct, if people were all rational thinkers. However, the same mentality that got people to wear masks and support prosecution of those who did not wear masks, will be receptive to the gun ban. The appeal is "If guns were banned, the mentally ill would not be able to acquire the guns to use in a mass shooting." Another example of why that propaganda will work is the fact that although the CDC et al has admitted that the vaxx does not prevent anyone from catching, carrying, or spreading Covid, the nurses and other health professionals that were fired for not getting the vaxx are not being hired back for the stated reason "by refusing the vaxx they endangered patient's health."

HeadSet says

You are correct, if people were all rational thinkers. However, the same mentality that got people to wear masks and support prosecution of those who did not wear masks, will be receptive to the gun ban. The appeal is "If guns were banned, the mentally ill would not be able to acquire the guns to use in a mass shooting.

Nobody is budging. The US federal government just used up it's last bit of credibility.

I don't know why people can't see it. MORE than 1/2 the country opposes the latest fucking war in Ukraine. The news media has the lowest viewership in my lifetime. People can openly contradict the government without ridicule.

If I pointed out the FIB was setting up false flags and using agent provocateurs 10 years ago, I would have been mocked. Today people all know who Ray Epps is

Even the late night haha men are washed up. They do a 5 person podcast and nobody cares. Hollywood is on strike and nobody cares. The propaganda system is broken.

The Maine Shooting by Robert Card on October 25, 2023 where he allegedly murdered 18 people is another Fake Shooting. Here is the proof: The pictures of Robert Card and a photo of the shooter shows two different people. Look at the position of his eyes in relation to the position of the ears. These are two different people. In the first picture his eyes are at a higher level than the ears. In the second picture the ears are at a higher level than the eyes. And if we have 18 dead people then who shot them? No answer.

Here is another image of the shooter where his ears are higher than the eyes:

These mass killing MKULtra/DARPA Studio killings are fake movies until they are given definitive proof aside from Guv and MSM assertion fallacy fiat. Patsys mostly dead, except for the Buffalo guy, or some who are so crazed they are in orbit around planet insanity, and nobody explains how kids get expensive arsenals and learn how to use them (government issue, I presume). Do they have a patsy training course and training theater at Quantico?

DOJ Report On The Response To The Uvalde School Shooting

The Justice Department on Thursday released a 600-page report to say that law enforcement’s response to the scene was a "failure that should not have happened. [1]

Yes, It took them almost 2 years to figure out, something we knew on day one!

"More than 370 officers from local, state and federal agencies responded to the scene but waited more than an hour - 77 minutes - to confront the gunman - even as children were dialing 911 from inside the classrooms." [2]

Why did it take 370 officers more than an hour to enter the school and confront the gunman? Was this another state sponsored shooting? It looks like it, does it not?

"There were five or six of [us] fathers hearing the gunshots, and the police were telling us to move back,' according to Javier Cazares, whose daughter Jacklyn was killed in the attack. "We didn’t care about us. We wanted to storm the building... and get our babies out." [3] The video in this link shows anguished parents screaming at the police. And the police pushing the parents back and preventing them from entering the school - and some parents were even arrested.

According to the report all these 370 officers were waiting for a set of keys to open a classroom door that was likely unlocked anyway. Yes, it took a 600 page report and two years to conclude that the door was "likely" unlocked!

[1] See Uvalde school shooting: Key takeaways from DOJ’s report on the police response
https://news.yahoo.com/uvalde-school-shooting-key-takeaways-doj-report-police-response-163120548.html?.tsrc=1013

[2] https://news.yahoo.com/uvalde-mass-shooting-robb-elementary-school-texas-biden-1-year-later-163541613.html

[3] https://news.yahoo.com/texas-police-admit-to-failed-shooting-response-say-kids-in-room-with-gunman-called-911-183121952.html

The_Deplorable says

The same reason the Tranny was busted in Cottage Grove today. Normally, they'd let a nutjob Nazi do their thing in order to forward the "Right Wing Terror" narrative, but they realized having a SECOND tranny mass shooting in a year would do more harm to their narrative.

The Latest From The Parkland School Shooting - A Reenactment

A Florida judge agreed Thursday that live ammunition can be used in a reenactment of the 2018 Marjory Douglas High School shooting. This is part of a civil lawsuit against Scot Peterson, the then-school's resource officer who remained outside as a shooter killed 17 people on Valentine’s Day 2018. "...victims’ families... want to record a reenactment of the shooting to show the former Broward Sheriff’s Office deputy would have heard the shots and known where they were coming from... The defense team for Peterson, has argued he didn’t enter the building because he couldn’t tell where the gunshots were coming from due to echoes on the campus..." https://www.cnn.com/2023/07/20/us/parkland-shooting-reenactment-civil-case/index.html

They need to include Nikolas Cruz - the convicted killer in this reenactment - because he was evacuating the school with other students during the shooting. Recall that Nikolas Cruz is an autistic and developmentally disable kid who lost his parents very early in life and then lost his adopted mother and so with no family to defend him became the perfect scapegoat for the Parkland shooting.

In an interview, Alexa Miednik, a senior at the high school, stated that she was walking and talking with Nikolas Cruz at the time of the shooting. See https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3KZdJFOFFfI and this precludes Nikolas Cruz from being the shooter. This contradicts the police timeline of the shooting and proves conclusively that Cruz is not the shooter. Someone else was shooting while Nikolas Cruz was evacuating the high school along with other students.

Another eye witness, teacher Stacy Lippel, saw the shooter from 20 feet away firing 'barrages' of bullets into classrooms and down the hallway. The shooter was wearing a helmet, face mask, bullet proof armor and shot at Lippel who got nicked! See 'Full metal garb' - Teacher describes masked gunman at Florida school shooting https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cPvYxTa1ph4

The_Deplorable says

Another eye witness, teacher Stacy Lippel, saw the shooter from 20 feet away firing 'barrages' of bullets into classrooms and down the hallway. The shooter was wearing a helmet, face mask, bullet proof armor and shot at Lippel who got nicked! See 'Full metal garb' - Teacher describes masked gunman at Florida school shooting https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cPvYxTa1ph4

@The_Deplorable - That's been deleted but fortunately, I have a copy:


original link


If you want a better, higher resolution copy, I can provide it.

I'm in the habit of grabbing videos now, just to see what is deleted. Storage is cheap.

richwicks says

"The_Deplorable - That's been deleted but fortunately, I have a copy:"

Thank you richwicks!

The Globalists delete these videos and go on pretending that such evidence does not exist or that it will be forgotten. This brings to mind three deleted YouTube videos where Obama in his own words admits that he founded, funded, armed and trained ISIS:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jUABL-Ialck
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mOYm_CCxxKk
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gwLufaTK29s

Do you happen to have any one of these deleted videos?

Again, thank you for the Stacy Lippel,video.

The_Deplorable says

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jUABL-Ialck
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mOYm_CCxxKk
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gwLufaTK29s

Do you happen to have any one of these deleted videos?

@The_Deplorable

https://web.archive.org/web/20170309213934/https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jUABL-Ialck
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eO1PmsNocxA
https://web.archive.org/web/20170127104223/https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gwLufaTK29s

The first and last I'm pretty certain of, the 2nd I'm not, I had to go by name.

These are videos from before people knew YouTube engaged in political censorship, and called me "crazy" for thinking there was. I have copies now anyhow.

"This brings to mind three deleted YouTube videos where Obama in his own words admits that
he founded, funded, armed and trained ISIS:.."

richwicks says

"The first and last I'm pretty certain of, the 2nd I'm not, I had to go by name."

Thank you! What is important is that this is Obama in his own words.