patrick.net

Also you would need informants or insiders that are credible who provide and explain this evidence.

The negative sum economy

A proper market economy should be a “positive-sum game” — through trade we both end up better off than we were before.

Economists also talk about “zero-sum games” where one person’s gain is another person’s loss so the net benefit to society is zero.

We live in a “negative-sum economy.” Every $1 of profit that Pharma makes, costs the American public $10 to $100 in harms. It’s the opposite of the multiplier effect. It was not always this way. But it’s here now and it’s the reason why the U.S. economy is going down the drain.

We live in a “negative-sum economy.” Every $1 of profit that Pharma makes, costs the American public $10 to $100 in harms.

Pfizer Sues Poland, Demanding Money for Undelivered and Unwanted COVID Vaccines.

I think that Poland should SUE PFIZER

After achieving a modest 57% COVID vaccination rate and seeing the vaccines not live up to the promise, Poles refused additional Pfizer COVID vaccine doses around April 2022.

"At the end of last week, we used the force majeure clause and informed both the European Commission and the main vaccine producer that we are refusing to take these vaccines at the moment and we are also refusing to pay," health minister Adam Niedzielski told private broadcaster TVN24.

"Indeed, the consequence of this will be a legal conflict, which is already taking place," he said.

Poland cannot directly terminate the contract for the supply of vaccines as the parties to the contracts are the European Commission and manufacturers, he said.

The value of the contract for vaccine supplies to Poland up to the end of 2023 with one producer alone was worth over 6 billion zlotys ($1.4 billion), with over 2 billion zlotys of that for supply in 2022.

Pfizer said its agreement over the supply of its COVID-19 vaccine to European Union member states was with the EU Commission.

"Our discussions with Governments and the details of vaccine deliveries are confidential," it added.

Somehow, Poland is a party to the EU/Pfizer contract that was kept confidential from the country but still obligates it to pay.

Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla and EU’s Ursula von der Leyen negotiated the contract in secret. (see picture below)




Anyway, now in 2023, Pfizer filed a suit, suing Poland for the monies due under the contract that was confidential and unavailable for Poland to even look at.




How a party can be obligated to pay under a contract that could not ever be assented to due to secrecy is a mystery to me, but I guess the legal minds in Europe see it differently.

Pfizer is suing in Brussels because Polish courts cannot see the contract and are unlikely to be very receptive to enforcing a contract that the court cannot review.

According to Polish newspaper Gazeta Prawa, Pfizer brought the civil case before a Brussels court because the doses were purchased through EU joint procurement contracts, drawn up under Belgian law.

Can Poland, perhaps, bring forth some novel defenses?

Infertility in Poland
Perhaps Poland can ask Pfizer to comment on the dramatic fall in fertility that Poland is experiencing.




Polish COVID Vaccine Victims
Poland may ask its local courts to make Pfizer compensate Polish COVID vaccine victims. (fortunately, there are fewer of them compared to the vax-crazy countries).

Pictures of some of the Polish victims of Covid vaccines, beautiful healthy humans who never needed the “vaccine” and yet died from it, are displayed by their bereaved relatives:




Can Pfizer explain, for example, why Sweden’s deaths continued to go up as the country was vaccinated, while Poland’s deaths went down after Poland refused COVID vaccines?

💉 Politico EU ran a story yesterday headlined, “Pfizer is suing Poland over vaccines. This is how we got here.” The sub-headline explained, “The court case is the latest fallout from Ursula von der Leyen’s massive COVID-19 vaccine contract.” I would represent Attila the Hun long before I’d ever consider representing Pfizer, but if I did, I would tell the pharma giant it is making a huge mistake.

Pfizer claims Poland refuses to pay for sixty million doses of Pfizer’s defective mRNA genetic shot. Poland says it doesn’t need them, never wanted them, and isn’t paying for them. But since Poland is in the European Union, it is legally bound to a jab contract signed by the EU’s president in Brussels. You’re welcome, Polish people.

In April 2022, Poland’s Health Minister announced the country was not taking delivery of any more covid vaccines. Poland invoked a force majeure (“Acts of God”) clause in the contract, citing economic disruption caused by Ukraine war refugees (war), and that evolving variants caused less need for vaccines (disease).

Then once they saw Poland getting away with it, other EU countries started complaining too.

To respond to the complaints, earlier this year in May the EU and Pfizer quietly announced a “substantial renegotiation” of the oversized original deal. The new agreement reduced the number of doses required to be purchased — by some unspecified amount — and stretched out the delivery and payment dates into 2026.

If only four percent of eligible adults took this year’s booster, who’ll want covid jabs in 2026?

Anyway, Poland smartly refused to sign the revised deal. So Pfizer intends to hold it to the original deal. But Poland will probably win this fight. Pfizer has a lot to lose if certain information obtained in discovery were somehow to be leaked. And if I were Poland’s lawyer, I would suggest responding to the lawsuit by arguing not only force majeure, but also that Pfizer fraudulently deceived Poland into the deal in the first place, by falsely representing that its crappy, defective product was safe and effective.

If Poland does it right, Pfizer is going to regret picking this fight.

L'etat, c'est Pfizer

After making tens of billions of dollars on its mRNA jab, the drug giant is happy to sue Poland and demand even MORE money; but its chairman feels different about lawsuits when he's the defendant. ...

The defendants want a short discovery schedule, because a quick clock is easier to run out with objections before they answer our questions. They’ve tried other big-firm defense tactics too. I don’t like what they’re doing, but I don’t take it personally.

However, the defendants - at least the two Pfizer defendants, senior board member and former Food and Drug Administration commissioner Dr. Scott Gottlieb and chairman Dr. Albert Bourla, DVM - are taking this case very personally indeed. ...

Bourla and Gottlieb very much hope to make the case about me. They opened their most recent filing by referring to “the conspiracy theories that have propelled [Berenson] to prominence online.”

Yep, those gosh-dang conspiracy theories.

You know, like this tweet from July 29, 2021, which led to my fourth strike from Twitter - and did nothing but correctly report the six-month results of Pfizer’s own pivotal clinical trial for its mRNA Covid jab.

The greater truth was that East India Company was the world’s largest drug cartel. Growing opium in India and shipping it to China. Empire was the original Drug Cartel, they have never let go of that business, they just found ways to legalize it, make Government’s dependent on it while making people worship it all over the world. It’s called Healthcare, Medicine and Pharma today.

Pfizer's stock price is at 1998 levels.

Last year, Pfizer had a PR disaster on their hands when their product (allegedly) caused Damar Hamlin to go into cardiac arrest during Monday Night Football. All signs suggest that they immediately bought off Hamlin and his family. Then Pfizer recruited the most likable guy in the NFL, goofy Travis Kelce, to endorse their deadly product. And then, in a lucky coincidence, Kelce started dating the most famous female pop star in the world.

Pfizer spent about $40 million and the genocide is back on track!