patrick.net

ad says

Pfizer's stock price is at 1998 levels.

https://finance.yahoo.com/news/pfizers-2024-revenue-forecast-below-115153987.html

Pfizer shares sink after weak 2024 forecasts

Pfizer on Wednesday forecast 2024 revenue and profit below Wall Street expectations, sending its shares down 7% in premarket trading even as it raised cost-cut target by $500 million.

A drop in annual COVID vaccination rates and demand for the treatments in 2023 have dragged sales of Pfizer's COVID products, Paxlovid and the vaccine it makes with German partner BioNTech.

The products, which had boosted its revenue over the last two years, are now expected to generate $8 billion in total sales in 2024.

Analysts were expecting sals of Comirnaty alone to be more than $8 billion besides more than $5 billion from Paxlovid.

The drop in COVID product sales had also forced Pfizer to launch a program to cut jobs and expenses, which is now expected to save least $4 billion a year.

The company, which employs nearly 83,000 employees globally, in November cut 500 jobs at its Sandwich, Kent site in the UK.

Pfizer's $43 billion deal for cancer drugmaker Seagen, which is expected to close on Thursday, is expected to add $3.1 billion to revenue next year.

The drugmaker said on Tuesday it plans to create an oncology division early next year that would include the acquisition. The new division will be led by Chris Boshoff, who now runs cancer research and development for Pfizer.

The U.S. drugmaker expects its annual revenue to be in the range of $58.5 billion to $61.5 billion compared with analysts' average estimate of $63.17 billion, according to LSEG data.

The company also forecast adjusted profit in the range of $2.05 to $2.25 per share, lower than analysts' expectation of $3.16.



I am also noticing:
Forward Dividend & Yield $1.64/share (5.74%)
EPS (TTM) $1.83

That's a pretty steep payout ratio. I can't imagine that's sustainable. But Motely Fool thinks it's probably safe:
https://www.fool.com/investing/2023/08/09/pfizers-profits-plunge-77-is-dividend-still-safe/

$26.70/sh -$1.88 (-6.58%) Pre-Market: 8:46 AM EST

https://tobyrogers.substack.com/p/thinking-points-february-9-2024

Last year, Pfizer had a PR disaster on their hands when their product (allegedly) caused Damar Hamlin to go into cardiac arrest during Monday Night Football. All signs suggest that they immediately bought off Hamlin and his family. Then Pfizer recruited the most likable guy in the NFL, goofy Travis Kelce, to endorse their deadly product. And then, in a lucky coincidence, Kelce started dating the most famous female pop star in the world.

Pfizer spent about $40 million and the genocide is back on track!

Pfizer ran a Super Bowl add for a new cancer pill. They may have toned down the halftime show, but still throwing it right in our faces in the commercials...

https://newworldhumor.substack.com/p/now-hiring-full-time-social-media

Now Hiring: Full-Time Social Media Doctor

Pfizer, Inc. | All Locations




Pfizer, Inc. is seeking a dedicated, enthusiastic healthcare professional to work full-time hours on social media, demonizing those who question the safety and effectiveness of the company’s products. The ideal candidate will have a medical degree approved by Pfizer, along with previous experience vilifying users in an online environment. We offer a competitive salary and benefits package, including the opportunity to quit your job practicing actual medicine.

In this exciting remote position, you will work under our Director of Public Ridicule to tear down large numbers of independent researchers, naturopaths, stay-at-home moms, and other threats to the company’s bottom line. Daily responsibilities include name-calling and labeling, creating smear campaigns, and leading a team of medical attack officers to gang up against the target population.

This is a senior-level cyberbully position with potential for growth into an even more destructive role.

Qualifications:

Basic medical training at a university funded by Pfizer

8+ years in public shaming and/or ridicule

Ability to mock alternative health practitioners at a grade school level or above

Working knowledge of X, Facebook, Instagram, Youtube, Tik Tok, and other social humiliation platforms

Up-to-date on the latest industry taunts, including “Hey, anti-vaxxers…”

Comfortable following a script and using our auto-debunker tool to quickly debunk claims made by critics of Big Pharma

Strong adherence to company guidelines, and a willingness to trust our Science

To Apply:

Please email paidshills@pfizer.com with your resume, cover letter, and an online portfolio showcasing some of your best anti-vax roasts and put-downs. Only serious medical trash talkers will be considered.

Pfizer, Inc. is an Unequal Opportunity Employer that discriminates on the basis of medical beliefs and vaccination status.

https://www.aussie17.com/p/pfizer-event-staffer-admits-to-avoiding

Pfizer Event Staffer Admits to Avoiding mRNA Jab during a Pfizer Vaccination campaign.

(Leaked Audio) Pfizer Event Rep : "Honestly, I took Sinovac! hehehe"

There's this whole charade about "Making a Pledge," as if you're swearing into knighthood rather than just rolling up your sleeve for a shot. Pfizer is here using a psychological play straight out of a textbook; it's not merely a vaccination, it's your solemn oath to humanity, your solemn promise to do your bit in some grander global scheme.

This maneuver taps into a primal need for belonging and purpose, packaging a medical decision as a moral high ground. However, dressing up a health choice with the emotional weight of a pledge blurs the lines between personal health autonomy and social coercion.

The moment Pfizer's "Project Vax" came into my view, it was like flipping a switch, dragging me back to my Pharma days. Back then, I learned the cardinal rule that you just don't see Pharma companies hawking their products directly to the unsuspecting public. That's a big no-no. The official playbook says you market to the medical professionals, not the patients — except, of course, in the US and New Zealand, where direct-to-consumer (DTC) advertisements are part of the landscape.

But here's Pfizer, strutting across the stage with "Project Vax," acting like they've got the run of the place. And why wouldn't they? Their ties with regulators and political bigwigs seem to give them a sense of invincibility, a belief that they can bend the rules without consequence.

Typically, Pharma's approach to boosting drug sales is more covert, wrapping their intentions in “Disease Awareness Campaigns”. They'd rather create fear educate you on the horrors of cancer or the risks of heart disease than mention their products outright. But if you attend an event or visit their site, suddenly you're on a path straight to their "partnered" doctors, who unsurprisingly, lean towards prescribing their drugs over any competitors'. That's Pharma marketing 101 – indirect, insidious, and incredibly effective.

Thankfully, people are finally opening their eyes to Pfizer's manipulative tactics, as they're met with a wave of outraged citizens shining a light on the dark corners of Pfizer’s so-called experimental vaccines - tainted with e.coli DNA and peppered with undisclosed SV40 promoters. . But wait, the plot thickens when Pfizer's very own carnival barkers, I mean, event reps, with a straight face, assure us that their glittering "Project Vax" extravaganza isn't about vaccinations at all. How utterly preposterous!

Stick around until the end of the video, and you'll catch a moment of pure comedic gold – a Pfizer event rep confesses they opted for the Chinese vaccine rather than their own brand of experimental mRNA wizardry. Talk about the punchline of the century!

https://twitter.com/thehealthb0t/status/1780120480290148737

The_Deplorable says

https://twitter.com/thehealthb0t/status/1780120480290148737

Just embedding it:

"Well, of course, there are the placebos so our various apparatchiks can virtue signal and preach the vax religion unharmed. We also need the placebos to compare the toxic batches for our research.

The medium toxic batches are, well, because we like to watch people suffer slowly with stealth maiming. We can also chart the vulnerable genetics by speed of death and the various emergent pathologies. Also, they will allow us to judge how well nanobots and self assembling entities, subject to EMP, operate. They can't all be dead for that part. At least not yet.

The most toxic batches are also controls to see the efficacy, speed and efficiency of maximum poisoning, immune system destruction, and induction of turbo cancers."

https://nypost.com/2024/05/08/business/pfizer-to-settle-over-10k-lawsuits-linking-zantac-to-cancer/

Pfizer agrees to settle over 10K lawsuits linking Zantac to cancer
By Social Links forAriel Zilber
Published May 8, 2024, 11:57 a.m. ET

Pfizer has agreed to settle more than 10,000 lawsuits which alleged that the company failed to warn patients about possible cancer risks caused by the anti-heartburn medication Zantac.

The lawsuits were filed in state courts across the country, but the agreements don’t completely resolve Pfizer’s exposure to the claims linking Zantac and cancer, according to Bloomberg News.

Terms of the settlements were not disclosed.

https://karenkingston.substack.com/p/teenage-boy-and-a-toddler-die-in-b8b

Teenage Boy and a Toddler Die in Ongoing Pfizer Gene Therapy Trial

Pfizer issued an official statement yesterday extending their condolences for the sudden cardiac death of toddler who was enrolled in their adenovirus gene-editing trial.

May 7, 2024: Yesterday I republished a video and article entitled, “What Happened to Their Babies,” describing the lack of ethics and grossly inhumane experimentation that Pfizer conducted on babies and toddlers with their COVID-19 mRNA gene-editing injections.

Just a few hours ago, multiple industry outlets began breaking this official statement from Pfizer that a toddler died of a cardiac arrest in an investigational trial of boys, aged 2 to 4 year olds, to treat a rare form of muscular dystrophy with a recombinant adenovirus gene editing technology.

There Was No Placebo in This Study Either

Just like in Pfizer’s COVID-19 gene-editing trial in babies and toddlers there was no placebo, there was no placebo group in this trial. ...

Teenage Boy Dies in 2021 in Phase 1 Trial for Same Gene Editing Technology

In December of 2021, Pfizer reported that a young patient died in their Phase 1 trial for this same gene-editing treatment for a rare form of genetically induced muscular dystrophy. ...

Criminal Charges Can Be Brought Against Pfizer’s Board and Executives

Pfizer’s board and executive management team are responsible for all of their human clinical trial data under Sarbanes-Oxley. CEO Albert Bourla can not plead ignorance to not knowing that the babies and toddlers in the ‘placebo group’ in Pfizer’s COVID-19 study were criminally experimented on when they were injected with the mRNA gene editing technology after the researchers had recorded an unprecedented incidence of disease, disabilities and death in the treatment group.

Patrick says

Criminal Charges Can Be Brought Against Pfizer’s Board and Executives

That will happen right after Hunter gets convicted and RichWicks buys a TV.

https://x.com/DiedSuddenly%20/status/1790346670800035847