patrick.net

Hawaii Democrat introduces bill to ban Trump from ballot

Hawaii considers legislation to ban presidential candidates over 14th Amendment's insurrection clause

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/hawaii-democrat-introduces-bill-ban-trump-ballot

https://markcrispinmiller.substack.com/p/scotus-smashes-colorados-case-on

SCOTUS smashes Colorado's "case" on Trump (and, along with it, the "insurrection" narrative)

Kagan, Jackson seemed to share the doubts of the conservative majority as to this latest "liberal" effort to condemn both Trump and those Americans who'd vote for him to "civil death"

Regardless of your take on Trump, or anybody else’s, the Court was somehow overtaken by lucidity—a rare thing in Year 4 of the “COVID crisis.”

UkraineIsFucked says

original link

Yeah, I think two things are finally being realized by the libtard deep state fucks:

1. After the satanist/pedo/globohomo fuckery of the last few years, there is no way to hold power short of martial law.

2. Any and all tactics, unconstitutional, illegal, or otherwise used against MAGA and left to stand as precident will quickly be turned against them.

I think they are still slow to recognize 2.

As The Federalist reported, federal authorities informed Baker and his legal team on Tuesday of a signed warrant for his arrest and instructed him to self-surrender for “alleged J6 crimes” in Dallas, Texas, on Friday morning. Baker has been at the forefront of reporting on the more questionable aspects of the Jan. 6 demonstrations.

While told he was being charged with “non-violent misdemeanors,” federal authorities declined to disclose to Baker or his lawyers what specific crimes underlie the arrest. According to Blaze News, the feds refused to reveal the charges ahead of Friday’s arrest because “they believe[d] Baker [would] post them on social media.” The Sixth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution guarantees individuals accused of a crime a right to “be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation.”

https://thefederalist.com/2024/03/01/biden-regime-ratchets-up-its-authoritarianism-with-arrest-of-blaze-investigative-reporter/

UkraineIsFucked says

tanked says

There is 0 chance this will stand after review by the SCOTUS. All the Colorado supremes did was embarass themselves. Perhaps this can now start an impeachment process on them.

Everything is going to shit. So don't count on it.

BTW

https://www.reuters.com/world/us/maine-elections-official-disqualifies-trump-presidential-primary-ballot-2023-12-28/

This was obvious it would happen. Colorado was so bad even the SCOTUS libs didn't stand for it.

tanked says

UkraineIsFucked says

tanked says

There is 0 chance this will stand after review by the SCOTUS. All the Colorado supremes did was embarass themselves. Perhaps this can now start an impeachment process on them.

Everything is going to shit. So don't count on it.

BTW

https://www.reuters.com/world/us/maine-elections-official-disqualifies-trump-presidential-primary-ballot-2023-12-28/

This was obvious it would happen. Colorado was so bad even the SCOTUS libs didn't stand for it.

You:

tanked says

Perhaps this can now start an impeachment process on them.

Me:

UkraineIsFucked says

Everything is going to shit. So don't count on it.

Colorado SC justices won't be impeached. Just as as I said. Has no bearing at all on how SCOTUS ruled, either.

UkraineIsFucked says

You:

tanked says

Perhaps this can now start an impeachment process on them.

Me:

UkraineIsFucked says

Everything is going to shit. So don't count on it.

Colorado SC justices won't be impeached. Just as as I said. Has no bearing at all on how SCOTUS ruled, either.

Why would you say "don't count on it" to what I said "perhaps" about. If I was counting on it I wouldn't have said "perhaps". So what you said only made sense if you were referring to the SCOTUS striking down the Colorado decision and you were saying don't count on it. Even though it was obvious it would happen.

tanked says

Why would you say "don't count on it" to what I said "perhaps" about. If I was counting on it I wouldn't have said "perhaps". So what you said only made sense if you were referring to the SCOTUS striking down the Colorado decision and you were saying don't count on it. Even though it was obvious it would happen.

Not my problem if you cherry pick the wrong part of what you wrote that I wasn't replying to.

UkraineIsFucked says

tanked says

Why would you say "don't count on it" to what I said "perhaps" about. If I was counting on it I wouldn't have said "perhaps". So what you said only made sense if you were referring to the SCOTUS striking down the Colorado decision and you were saying don't count on it. Even though it was obvious it would happen.

Not my problem if you cherry pick the wrong part of what you wrote that I wasn't replying to.

not my problem if you make no sense

tanked says

not my problem if you make no sense

I make perfect sense. Not my prob you can't fucking comprehend what you yourself wrote:

You:

tanked says

Perhaps this can now start an impeachment process on them.

Me:

UkraineIsFucked says

Everything is going to shit. So don't count on it.

Unless you still want to jack off over the fantasy that CO SC justices will be impeached over this.

UkraineIsFucked says

tanked says

not my problem if you make no sense

I make perfect sense. Not my prob you can't fucking comprehend what you yourself wrote:

You:

tanked says

Perhaps this can now start an impeachment process on them.

Me:

UkraineIsFucked says

Everything is going to shit. So don't count on it.

Unless you still want to jack off over the fantasy that CO SC justices will be impeached over this.

What I thought you meant, was dumb. But it turns out what you actually meant was even dumber, including what you just said, since I put the word perhaps in that idea right in the very beginning. Thanks for clarifying.

tanked says

What I thought you meant, was dumb. But it turns out what you actually meant was even dumber,

^^^^^ don't do drugs while posting on PatNet, kiddies. You'll come across as a Libtard...or just don't come across as anything at all.

UkraineIsFucked says

tanked says

What I thought you meant, was dumb. But it turns out what you actually meant was even dumber,

^^^^^ don't do drugs while posting on PatNet, kiddies. You'll come across as a Libtard...or just don't come across as anything at all.

Don't count on the Colorado Supremes getting overturned.... uh oh OH no I meant don't count on them perhaps possibly getting impeached. Yeah that's it

tanked says

Don't count on the Colorado Supremes getting overturned...

I didn't say that. Not my problem you IMAGINE that I did.

tanked says

don't count on them perhaps possibly getting impeached. Yeah that's it.

Exactly. Not my problem your reading comprehension skills suck.

You tried to troll me over something that you claim that I said but didn't, got caught fucking that up and now can't handle it.

#Libtard