patrick.net

CDC Upset Their Own Expert Advisers Not Recommending Masks, Demands They Recommend Masks

Too much science is forcing CDC to request a science do over after CDC’s own scientist and outside experts find N95 respirators don’t work better than masks—and neither do much to protect from COVID.

It is hardly surprising but no less distressing to read the news from Taiwan where, like other parts of the Far East they took to masks mandates with enthusiasm, that an 11-month old boy has died after being forced to wear a face mask at nursery. The incident took place on January 24, despite the fact that mask mandates related to childcare in Taiwan were lifted over a year ago.

The details are harrowing but nevertheless instructive, showing just how effective brainwashing regarding face masks has been:

‘According to surveillance video footage viewed by the parents, the incident happened when the boy became irritated and took off his mask, after which the teacher put it back on for him. At that point, the child burst out crying, which possibly saturated the mask with tears and mucus, causing it to stick to his nose and mouth and suffocate him. In the video footage, the child was then seen “struggling” and “falling over”. The teacher, however, apparently assumed he had become exhausted and fallen asleep, and only discovered that he was unresponsive 20 minutes later, when it was time to move the children to another room.’

It has since been confirmed that the child did not have any cardiac defects which could have exacerbated his condition. He died as a direct result of having been forced to wear a face mask. Any child’s death under these circumstances would be heartbreaking but, in addition to this almost unimaginable incident, there is the back story of the parents’ struggle for many years to have a baby.

In addition to the tragedy, two things are striking from this story: the absence of any mention of the death in the international legacy media (I could find no reference to it other than in Taiwanese newspapers); and the outrage which seems to be aimed only at the fact that this incident exceeded the expired mask mandate.

The veil of silence by the press outside Taiwan is hardly surprising given the role that they played in promoting the wearing of face masks. In the United Kingdom the Guardian said that the government should promote the wearing of face masks ‘more forcefully’. The New York Times recently tried to discredit Jefferson and colleagues’ Cochrane review showing no evidence for the effectiveness of face masks claiming, ‘Why the Science Is Clear That Masks Work’.

These were my observations when entering the overflow covid unit at the hospital (2021) after the shots began. Everyone at the nurses’ station was coughing and sneezing, and masks were hanging. The nurses had taken the shots and were sick in addition to vaccine shedding exposure. Everyone responded with respiratory, flu-like symptoms. The masks protected no one.

Surgical masks have gaping holes around the sides of the face where airborne germs enter and exit. They do not stop the spread of highly infectious airborne pathogens. We were told by management, they like how they looked.

There is an effective mask called an N-95 that requires professional fitting. This masks in conjunction with a negative pressure room, can protect against disease transmission. These rooms are reserved for Tb patients for example.

The N-95 can only be worn for short periods of time when properly used, because breathing is greatly hindered.

There are also germs that live within the healthcare setting called nosocomial infections. Listed above are a few. Natural immunity is what keeps us healthy and hand washing remains the number one way to reduce disease transmission.

Just like ALL the other measures (lockdowns, social distancing, face shields, plastic eyewear, closing schools/businesses and “the shots”), masks did NOT stop disease transmission.

Despite authority endorsement for appearance and false security, surgical masks don’t stop the spread of anything..

A security guard was repeatedly punched in the face during an altercation with a group of men who were asked to leave a bar for refusing to wear masks, according to local media.

The 18-year-old staff member was attacked by patrons of Round One bar in Lincoln, Nebraska, after they reportedly refused to use face coverings.

The group was asked to leave the bar several times for failing to follow an indoor mask mandate imposed by the county in July, the Lincoln Journal Star said.

When the security guard followed them into the bathroom, one member of the group allegedly punched him in the face several times and stole his work badge before leaving.

Those people did the right thing.

Those people did the right thing.

Punching the security guard was cowardly, why not find and punch the county official that imposed that mask mandate?

The evils done to the many through covid were done with the acceptance and desire of the majority as shown in public opinion surveys. Democracy in Massachusetts manifested in ~97% mask compliance in early 2021 with an unlawful order that had nothing to do with the prevention of spread of disease (Delphi Group 2024).

The Governor of Maskachusetts was notified on April 20, 2020, two weeks before issuing the mask mandate, that even KN-95 masks are not able to stop transmission. This is proven in The Baker Knew, which evinces e-mail messages by and between agents of the Massachusetts Department of Public Health and Professor Gregory Rutledge of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Rutledge contracted with the state to test masks flown in from China on the New England Patriots jet (Beaudoin 2022). (ESPN 2020). The masks under test did not filter aerosolized viral particles to the specification required to be effective or the specification stated on the product.

The People of Massachusetts were overwhelmingly in favor of masks because the truth that masks do not work was hidden from them. The People were also deprived of the fact that state agents, hospital staff, doctors, and others fraudulently inflated the covid death count and hid covid “vaccine” deaths (Beaudoin 2024). Some of The People of Massachusetts attacked those who refused masks and those who spoke badly about covid “vaccines.” ...

In the covid era, manifest democracy resulted in a million people needlessly killed by hospital protocols and covid gene drug therapies called “vaccines.” Those who refused self-harm were denigrated, derogated, sacked from employment, de-licensed in their professions, physically battered, verbally assaulted, and other rights violated because the public interest was unlawfully elevated above individual rights and liberty. And that was allowed to happen under the improper governance of manifest democracy.

I just snapped a photo here on the door because it says what the exemptions are. [reading from the photo on her smartphone] It says that the cloth face covering shall not apply to any of the following persons: Children under the age of 2, anyone who has trouble breathing or who is unconscious, incapacitated or otherwise unable to remove the face cloth covering without assistance, or persons with a medical or mental health condition.

You need to add a religious exemption. Tens of thousands of Christians are being persecuted in this county. I am not Muslim, I do not veil my face. I was made in the image of God. You started this meeting with a prayer, are those just empty words? I was made in the image of God, I am an image-bearer of God, and I do not veil my face, that is a Muslim practice.

Let me tell you the law in California is California Government Code 129262. Please write this down and please research it. 129262. It's a definition of my religious liberty as protected that you have taken an oath to uphold.

[reading from paper] Religious dress practice shall be construed broadly to include the wearing of face coverings.

That means I have the ability to not wear a face covering.

I am calling on you today to have this conversation with Health Officer Chao and within 10 days I want to see that added to this exemption. If not, there will be a file of a notice of claim for legal action against you for not upholding your oath of office. Thank you.